On the Phase Transformation Ceγ \(\leftrightarrows\) Ceα

  • Xavier Oudet


Cerium metal and SmS exhibit very interesting phase transformation. There is a large variation of the lattice parameter without any charge in the crystal structure1,2. To interpret these properties a change of valence was proposed eventually with fractional valence giving the notions of valence instabilities and intermediate valence. In the case of cerium the phase transformation Ceγ \(\leftrightarrows\) Ceα was first attributed to a change of valence from 3 in Cey to 4 in Ceα1. From extensive analyses of magnetic susceptibility and metallic radii different intermediate values of the valence were proposed3,4,5. But these notions have not led to a clear understanding of the problems. In our opinion one of the difficulties is that we must distinguish two aspects : on the one hand the existence of bonds each one involving one electron and on the other hand the strength of each bond. Shrinkage with large variation of the molecular or atomic volume must be attributed at least to one new bond involving the participation of one electron. Small variation of volume must be explained by variation of the intensity of the bonds. This last point arises from a comparison between the monochalcogenides of the rare earths and 3d metals6,7. In this paper we want to focus the attention on the cerium case.


Positron Annihilation Atomic Volume High Pressure Phase Additional Bond Intermediate Valence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D.C. KOSKENMAKI, K.A. GSCHNEIDER Jr, in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths Vol. 1, 337–377, Editors GSCHNEIDER K.A. Jr and EYRING L. North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. JAYARAMAN, in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths Vol. 2, 575–611, Editors GSCHNEIDER K.A. Jr and EYRING L., North- Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.M. LOCK, Proc. Phys. Soc., 70B, 1957,566,Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. MURAO, T. MATSUBARA, Prog. Theor. Phys., (Kyoto), 18, 1957, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.A. GSCHNEIDER Jr., R. SMOLUCHOWSKI, J. Less-Common Metals.5, 1963, 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. OUDET, Ann. Chim. Fr., 8, 1983, 483–507Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. OUDET, Reactivity of solids to be published in 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.W.G. WYCKOFF, “Crystal Structures” Vol 1, 2nd edition, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.L. CHERNICK et al., Science 138, 1968, 136–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. ANDERSON, Acta. Cryst. B 35, 1979, 1321–4,Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.R. GUSTAFSON, A.R. MACKINTOSH, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 10, 1965, 376.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.R. GUSTAFSON, J.D. MaNUTT, L.O. ROELLIG, Phys. Rev. 183, 1969, 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.M. BORING et al., J. Magn. Magnetic Mater., 37, 1983, L7-L10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K.P. GOPINATHAN, C.S. SUNDAR, B. VISWANATHAN, Solid. State Com. 32 1974, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.P. GOPINATHAN, C.S. SUNDAR, B. VISWANATHAN, A. BHARATHI, Bull. Mater. Sci. 2, 1980, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. JAYARAMAN, V. NARAYANAMURTI, E. BUCHER, R.G. MAINES, Phys. Rev. Lett., 25, 1970, 1430–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    X. OUDET, Valence Instabilities and Related Narrow-Band Phenomena, 1977, p. 525–7, edited by R. Parks, Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. OUDET, J. de Phys. 40, 1979, 395–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    X. OUDET, J. of Phys. C, 13, 1980, L205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Oudet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de MagnétismeC.N.R.S.MeudonFrance

Personalised recommendations