Advertisement

Riddles, Legal Decisions, and Peirce’s “Existential Graphs”

  • Roberta Kevelson
Part of the Topics in Contemporary Semiotics book series (TICSE)

Abstract

As the title suggests, Peirce’s existential graphs, legal decisions, and riddles are members of a relationship that has not been examined from the perspective of semiotics. It is a relationship that, at first glance, seems to resemble Lewis Carroll’s conjunct, “cabbages and kings.” And, like the walrus, this chapter discusses paradox, nonsense, and incongruity in a significant way as they relate to legal semiotics.

Keywords

Modal Graph Legal Decision Syllogistic Reasoning Hypothetical Reasoning Existential Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 13.
    See also Taylor (1948), in particular pp. 28–32, 34, 35, 41, 53, 54, 76, 96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Kevelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityReadingUSA

Personalised recommendations