Advertisement

The Constitution as Interpretant Sign

  • Roberta Kevelson
Part of the Topics in Contemporary Semiotics book series (TICSE)

Abstract

Because of the wealth of his contributions to American law and to the shaping of the United States Constitution, and because of his principal role in interpreting Peirce’s pragmatism and semiotic theory and method into what has developed as the most revolutionary movement in modern law, namely, legal realism and its congeners, the thought of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes should be examined more closely than is possible within the scope of this book. The writings about Holmes, from the viewpoints of jurisprudence, social philosophy, and legal philosophy, are voluminous, raising questions far beyond those addressed in this introduction to legal semiotics; they warrant a separate study on Holmes, which is in preparation.

Keywords

Legal System Private Property Practical Wisdom United States Constitution Legal Profession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See Moore (1979:238–268, especially 239, 240).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See also Parker (1979:269–295).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid., 260.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., 272, 273.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Peirce (1967:302, 303, L75).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See McCloskey (1962:34–46); also Wright (1938).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    See Hayek (1973:115).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Ibid., 121.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Ibid., 141 ff.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    See Friedman (1962:219–243).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Ibid., 219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta Kevelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityReadingUSA

Personalised recommendations