Skip to main content

The Token Economy

  • Chapter

Overview

The essential parts of a token economy include only a few basic components (Kazdin, 1977) that are found in most behavioral interventions in the schools. Token systems include (a) tokens themselves, (b) determination of target behaviors, (c) specification of rules for how tokens are earned or lost, (d) specification of back-up consequences and their cost, and (e) method for exchanging tokens for back-up consequences (Kazdin, 1977; McLaughlin, 1975; K. D. O’Leary & Drabman, 1971).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberto, P. A., Troutman, A. C. (1986). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, S. (1973). Comparison of individual and group contingencies in two special classes. Behavior Therapy, 4, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., Azrin, N. (1968). Reinforcer sampling: A technique for increasing behavior of mental patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., Roberts, M. D. (1974). Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 71–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., Layman, D., Burke, S. (1972). Disruptive behavior and reinforcement of academic performance. The Psychological Record, 22, 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, G. C., Richards, H. C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented contingency system for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bippes, R., McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, R. L. (1986). A classroom token system in a detention center: Effects for academic and social behavior. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 2, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, T. A., Frinfrock, S. R., Breunig, M. K., Bushell, D. (1972). The use of programmed materials in the analysis of academic contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 177–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, T. A., Graubrad, P., Stans, A. (1972). Analysis of the effects of sequential reinforcement contingencies on aspects of composition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 421–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, N. L., Allen, G. J. (1975). Effects of implementing a token economy on teach attending behavior. Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broden, M., Hall, R. V., Dunlap, A., Clark, R. (1970). Effects of teacher attention and a token reinforcement system in a junior high school special education class. Exceptional Children, 36, 341–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Reschly, D., Sabers, D. (1974). Using group contingencies with punishment and positive reinforcement to modify aggressive behaviors in a Head Start classroom. The Psychological Record, 24, 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushell, D. (1973). Classroom behavior: A little book for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushell, D. (1974). The design of classroom contingencies. In F. S. Keller, E. Ribes-Inesta (Eds.), Behavior modification: Applications to education (pp. 29–42). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushell, D (1978). An engineering approach to the elementary classroom: The behavior analysis follow-through project. In AC Catania, TA Brigham (Eds.). Handbook of applied behavior analysis. Social and instructional processes (pp. 525–563). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, B. A., Day, R. C. (1971). Systematic reinforcement: Academic performance of underachieving students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4,311–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. E. (1975). Effects of combining methylphenidate and a classroom token economy system in modifying hyperactive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 266–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. E., Sprague, R. L. (1973). Reduction of hyperactive behavior by conditioning procedures alone and combined with methylphenidate (Ritalin). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 11, 331–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M., Lachowicz, J., Wolf, M. M. (1968). A pilot basic education program for school dropouts incorporating a token reinforcement system. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colyer, M. J., Hernandez-Guzman, L., Williams, R. L. (1976). The effects of tokens in the token economy. In T. A. Brigham, R. P. Hawkins, J. W. Scott, T. F. McLaughlin (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Self-control and reading (pp. 235–243). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabman, R. S., Spitalnik, R., O’Leary, K. D. (1973). Teaching self-control to disruptive children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 10–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drabman, R. S., Spitalnik, R., Spitalnik, K. (1974). Sociometrie and disruptive behavior as a function of four types of token reinforcement programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felixbrod, J. J., O’Leary, D. K. (1973). Effects of reinforcement on children’s academic behavior as a function of self-determined and externally imposed contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 241–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felixbrod, J. J., O’Leary, K. D. (1974). Self-determination of academic standards by children: Toward freedom from external control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 845–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaman, F., McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). Token reinforcement: Effects on academic accuracy and generalization to social behavior with an adolescent student. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 2, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankosky, R. J., Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1978). Individual and group contingencies and collateral behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 9, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gate, J.J. (1972). Overspending (stealing) in a token economy. Behavior Therapy, 3, 152–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, E. L. (1970). Classroom applications of self-determined reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 123–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, G. S., Madsen, C. H., DeMersseman, L. M. (1973). The effects of individual and interdependent contingencies on inappropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 488–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. V., Panyon, M., Rabon, D., Broden, M. (1968). Instructing beginning teachers in reinforcement procedures which improve classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 315–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, R. L., Hathaway, C., Wodarski, J. (1974). Group contingencies, peer tutoring, and accelerating academic achievement. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 421–432). Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, T, McLaughlin, TF (1981). Reducing absences and tardiness in a junior secondary special education classroom: The SCOPE Program. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 5, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, L. A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavior control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 528–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, E., McLaughlin, T. F. (1982). The use of response cost, public posting, and group consequences to reduce inappropriate behaviors of an entire elementary school population during supervision. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B., Bailey, J. S. (1974). Reward versus cost token programs: An analysis of the effects on students and teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 567–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J., McLaughlin, T. F. (1982). The effects of free time on assignment completion and accuracy in arithmetic: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, K. F., O’Leary, K. D. (1972). Reward, cost, and self-evaluation procedures for disruptive adolescents in a psychiatric hospital school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 293–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1972). Response cost: The removal of conditioned reinforcers for therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 3, 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The token economy: A review and evaluation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). The token economy: A decade later. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 431–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, AE (1983). Failure of persons to respond to the token economy. In EA Foa, Paul MG Emmelkamp (Eds.), Failures in behavior therapy (pp. 335–354). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. L. (1970). A “paper money” token system as a recording aid in institutional settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 183–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. D., Williams, R. L. (1973). The comparative effectiveness of group and individually contingent free-time with inner-city junior high school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 465–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt, T. C., Curtiss, K. (1969). Academic response rate as a function of teacher- and self-imposed contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt, T. C., Esveldt, K. A. (1970). The relative effects on math performance of single-versus-multiple ratio schedules: A case study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 261–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt, T. C., Guppy, T. E., Blattner, J. E. (1969). The use of a free-time contingency with fourth grades to increase spelling accuracy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 7, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, K., Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgments of creativity in writing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 425–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, RC, McLaughlin, TF (1981). A comparison between the effect of free time and daily report cards on the academic behavior of junior high school students. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 5, 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKensie, H. S., Clark, M., Wolf, M. M., Kothera, R., Benson, C. (1968). Behavior modification of children with learning disabilities using grades as tokens and allowances as backup reinforcers. Exceptional Children, 34, 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1975). The applicability of token reinforcement systems in public school systems. Psychology in the Schools, 12, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1976). Self-control in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 46, 631–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1981a). An analysis of token reinforcement: A control group comparison with special education youth employing measures of clinical significance. Child Behavior Therapy, 3, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1981b). The effects of a classroom token economy on math performance in an intermediate grade school class. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1981c). Effects of individual and group contingencies on the programmed reading performance of special education students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 76–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1982a). A comparison of individual and group contingencies on spelling performance with special education students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 4 (2/3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1982b). Effects of self-determined and high performance standards on spelling performance: A multi-element baseline analysis. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 4, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). Effects of self-recording for on-task and academic responding: A long term analysis. Journal for Special Education Technology, 6 (3), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F. (1984). A comparison of self-recording and self-recording plus consequences for on-task and assignment completion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1972a). Intrinsic reinforcers in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 263–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1972b). Reducing and measuring inappropriate verbalizations in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 329–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1974a). Increasing and maintaining assignment completion with teacher and pupil controlled individual contingency programs: Three case studies. Psychology, 11 (3), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1974b). Note on the combined and separate effects of token reinforcement and response cost on assignment completion. Psychological Reports, 35, 1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1975). The effects of token reinforcement contingencies on the completion and accuracy of assignments under fixed and variable token exchange schedules. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 7, 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1976). An analysis of assignment completion across time during fixed, variable, and extended exchange periods in a classroom token economy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1977). The comparative effects of token reinforcement with and without a response cost contingency with special edu-cation children. Educational Research Quarterly, 2,34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Malaby, J. E. (1979). Modification of performance standards in elementary special education students. Education and Treatment of Children, 2, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Scott, J. W. (1976). The use of response cost to reduce inappropriate classroom behavior in classroom settings. Corrective and Social Psychiatry, 22 (2), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Brown, D., Dolliver, P., Malaby, J. E. (1977). The comparative effects of a timing device and group and individual contingencies for on-task be¬havior and academic responding in a special education class. Behavioral Engineering, 4, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. F., Burgess, N., Sackville-West, L. (1981). Effects of self-recording and self-recording and matching on academic performance. Child Behavior Therapy, 3, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds, W. T., Grange, J., Speltz, M. L. (1981). Effects of multiple, individual, and group operant contingencies on student performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D. (1978). The operant and social psychology of token systems. In A. C. Catania, T. A. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and instructional processes (pp. 179–207). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., Becker, W. C. (1967). Behavior modification of an adjustment class: A token reinforcement program. Exceptional Children, 9, 637–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., Drabman, R. S. (1971). Token reinforcement programs in the classroom: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., Becker, W. C., Evans, M., Saudargas, R. (1969). A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematic analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. G., Dubey, D. R. (1979). Applications of self-control procedures by children: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 449–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, S. G., O’Leary, K. D. (1976). Behavior modification in the school. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy (pp. 475–515). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. G. (1969). Free-time as a reinforcer in the management of classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 113–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, R. G. (1970). The control of classroom attention: A group contingency for complex behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. S., Polloway, E. A., Kauffman, J. M., Scran-ton, T. R. (1975). Living in the classroom: A currency-based token economy. New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (1962). Reversability of the reinforcement relation. Science, 136, 255–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, G., O’Leary, K. D. (1974). Teaching children to develop high performance standards. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York at Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (1974). The great school wars, New York City, 1805–1973: A history of the public schools as a battlefield for social change. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Morgan, D., Young, K. R. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behav-iorally handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluation procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. S., Drabman, R. S. (1979). Self-control training in the classroom: A review and critique. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 467–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santogrossi, D. A., O’Leary, K. D., Romanczyk, R. G., Kaufman, K. F. (1973). Self-evaluation of by adolescents in a psychiatric hospital school token program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 277–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M, Williams, RL, McLaughlin, TF (1983). The daily report card as an intervention technique for classroom academic and social behavior: A review. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 7, 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speltz, M. L., Moore, J. E., McReynolds, W. T. (1979). A comparison of standardized and interdependent group contingencies in a classroom setting. Behavior Therapy, 10, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speltz, M. L., Shimamura, J. W., McReynolds, W. T. (1982). Procedural variations in group contingencies: Effects of children’s academic and social behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 533–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, W., Payne, J. S., Stainback, S., Payne, R. A. (1973). Establishing a token economy in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. P., McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). The effects of group and individual contingencies on reading performance with Native American junior high school students. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 2, 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., McLaughlin, T. F. (in press). The effects of bonus contingencies on math performance within an ongoing token economy with junior high school special education students. Adolescence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truhlicka, Swain, J., McLaughlin, T. F. (in press). Effects of token reinforcement and response cost on the accuracy of spelling performance with adolescent special education students. Adolescence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkewitz, H., O’Leary, K. D., Ironsmith, M. (1975). Generalization of maintenance of appropriate behavior through self-control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 577–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten, R. (1979). The performance feedback system: Generalization across time. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M., Giles, D. K., Hall, R. V. (1968). Experiments with token reinforcement in a remedial classroom. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 51–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, C. F., Pigott, H. E., Clement, P. W., Fantuzzo, J. W. (1985). Student-administered group oriented contingencies: The application of self-regulation techniques in the context of a group to increase academic productivity. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 1, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLaughlin, T.F., Williams, R.L. (1988). The Token Economy. In: Witt, J.C., Elliot, S.N., Gresham, F.M. (eds) Handbook of Behavior Therapy in Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0905-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0905-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8238-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0905-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics