Home-Based Reinforcement Procedures

  • Mary L. Kelley
  • Laura B. Carper

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, behavior therapists have become more reliant on the use of parents and teachers to implement interventions with children. The use of adult caretakers as contingency managers has proven to be an efficient and effective method of remediating children’s behavior problems.

Keywords

Stein DEHA Imber 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. N., Corbett, T. F., Smigel, J. (1976). The effects of individual and group consequences on school attendance and curfew violations with pre-delinquent adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 221–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkeson, B. M., Forehand, R. (1979). Home-based reinforcement programs designed to modify classroom behavior: A review and methodological evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1298–1308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayllon, T., Garber, S., Pisor, K. (1975). The elimination of discipline problems through a combined school-home motivational system. Behavior Therapy, 6, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayllon, T., Layman, D., Kandel, H. J. (1975). A behavioral-educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8,137–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anesko, K. M., O’Leary, S. G. (1983). The effectiveness of brief parent training for the management of children’s homework problems. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 4, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, J. S., Wolf, M. M., Phillips, E. L. (1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents’ classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 223–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernal, M. E., Linnert, M. D., Schultz, L. A. (1980). Outcome evaluation of behavioral parent training and client-centered parent counseling for children with conduct problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 677–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berowitz, B. P., Graziano, A. M. (1972). Training parents as behavior therapists: A review. Behavior Research and Therapy, 12, 308–319.Google Scholar
  9. Blechman, E. A., Kotanchik, N. L., Taylor, C. J. (1981). Families and schools together: Early behavioral intervention with high risk children. Behavior Therapy, 12, 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blechman, E. A., Taylor, C. J., Schrader, S. M. (1981). Family problem solving versus home notes as early intervention with high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 6, 919–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broughton, S. F., Barton, E. S., Owen, P. P. (1981). Home based contingency systems for school problems. School Psychology Review, 10, 26–36.Google Scholar
  12. Budd, K. S., Leibowitz, J. M., Riner, L. S., Mindell, C., Goldfarb, A. L. (1981). Home-based treatment of severe disruptive behaviors: A reinforcement package for preschool and kindergarten children. Behavior Modification, 5, 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, R. G. (1973). A procedure for fading from experimenter-school-based to parent-home-based control of classroom behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dougherty, E. H., Dougherty, A. (1977). The daily report card: A simplified and flexible package for classroom behavior management. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, S. N. (1986). Children’s acceptability of classroom interventions for misbehavior: Findings and methodological considerations. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairchild, T. N. (1976). Home-school token economies: Bridging the communication gap. Psychology in the Schools, 13, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferritor, D. E., Buckholdt, D., Hamblin, R. L., Smith, L. (1972). The noneffects of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 7–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forehand, R., King, H. E. (1977). Noncompliant children. Behavior Modification, 1, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foxx, R. M., Jones, J. R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gresham, F. M., Lemanek, K. L. (1987). Parent education. In C. A. Maher, S. G. Forman (Eds.), Providing effective educational services in school organizations: A behavioral approach (pp. 153–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Guidubaldi, J. (1982). Transcending future shock: Invariant principles for school psychology. School Psychology Review, 11, 127–131.Google Scholar
  22. Heaton, R. C., Safer, D. J., Allen, R. P., Spinnato, N. C., Prumo, F. M. (1976). A motivational environment for behaviorally deviant junior high school students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 263–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imber, S. C., Imber, R. B., Rothstein, C. (1979). Modifying independent work habits: An effective teacher-parent communication program. Exceptional Children, 45, 218–221.Google Scholar
  24. Karraker, R. J. (1972). Increasing academic performance through home-managed contingency programs. Journal of School Psychology, 2, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirby, F. D., Shields, F. (1972). Modification of arithmetic response rate and attending behavior in a seventh grade student. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5,29–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lahey, B. B., Gendrich, J. G., Gendrich, S. I., Schnelle, J. F., Gant, D. S., McNees, M. P. (1977). An evaluation of daily report cards with minimal teacher and parent contacts as an efficient method of classroom intervention. Behavior Modification, 1, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long, J. D., Williams, R. L. (1973). The comparative effectiveness of group and individually contingent free time with inner-city junior high school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 465–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacDonald, W. S., Gallimore, R., MacDonald, G. (1970). Contingency counseling by school personnel: An economical model of intervention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 175–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mash, E. J., Hammerlynck, L. A., Handy, L. C. (Eds.). (1976). Behavior modification and families. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  30. McAllister, L. W., Stachowiak, J. G., Baer, D. M., Conderman, L. (1969). The application of operant conditioning techniques in a secondary school classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 277–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreland, J. R., Schwebel, A. T., Beck, S., Wells, R. (1982). Parents as therapists: A review of the behavior therapy parent training literature—1975–1981. Behavior Modification, 6, 250–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Dell, S. L. (1974). Training parents in behavior modification: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 418–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Leary, S. G., Dubey, D. R. (1979). Applications of self-control procedures by children: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 449–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  35. Patterson, G. R., Chamberlain, P., Reed, J. B. (1982). A comparative evaluation of a parent-training program. Behavior Therapy, 13, 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porterfield, J. K., Herbert-Jackson, E., Risley, T. R. (1976). Contingent observation: An effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in group settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 55–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reisinger, J. J., Ora, J. D., Frangia, G. W. (1976). Parents as change agents for their children: A review. Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saudargaus, R. W., Madsen, C. H., Scott, J. W. (1977). Differential effects of fixed- and variable-time feedback on production rates of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schumaker, JB, Hovell, MF, Sherman, JA(1977). An analysis of daily report cards and parent-managed privileges in the improvement of adolescents’ classroom performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 449–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stumphauzer, J. S. (1976). Elimination of stealing by self-reinforcement of alternative behavior and family contracting. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 7, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Todd, D. D., Scott, R. B., Bostow, E., Alexander, S. B. (1976). Modification of the excessive inappropriate classroom behavior of two elementary school students using home-based consequences and daily report card procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turco, T. L., Elliott, S. N. (1985). Students’ acceptability rating of interventions for classroom misbehaviors: A developmental study of well-behaving and misbehaving youth. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  43. Wahler, R. G., Fox, J. J. (1980). Solitary toy play and time out: A family treatment package for children with aggressive and oppositional behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 23–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagner, R. F., Guyer, B. D. (1971). Maintenance of discipline through increasing children’s span of attending by means of a token economy. Psychology in the Schools, 8, 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11,203–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winett, R. A., Winkler, R. C. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., Elliott, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers’ judgements of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary L. Kelley
    • 1
  • Laura B. Carper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations