The Principles of Experimental Design and Analysis in Relation to Theory Building

  • Raymond B. Cattell
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)


The frame of reference on which we now focus is that of general psychological research, within which we propose to define the varieties of experimental design. It is necessary to get into such a perspective that multivariate experimental design which we have so far briefly historically introduced but with which later chapters are extensively concerned.


Relational System Theoretical Construct Multivariate Method Theory Building Theory Construction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, G. W. Personality. New York: Holt, 1937.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, F. Novum organum. Translated by T. Fowler (2nd ed., rev.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1889.Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, R. B. Scientific explanations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  4. Brunswik, E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  5. Burt, C. L. Correlations between persons. British Journal of Psychology, 1937, 28, 59–96.Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, R. Foundations of logic and mathematics. In International encyclopedia of unified science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell, R. B. Description and measurement of personality. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N.Y.: World Book Company, 1946.Google Scholar
  8. Cattell, R. B. The fate of national intelligence: Test of a thirteen-year prediction. Eugenics Review, 1950a, 42, 136–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cattell, R. B. Personality: A systematical, theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw—Hill, 1950b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cattell, R. B. Factor analysis. New York: Harper, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. Cattell, R. B. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N.Y.: World Book Company, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. Cattell, R. B. The dynamic calculus: A system of concepts derived from objective motivation measurement. In G. Lindsey (Ed.), The assessment of human motives. New York: Rinehart, 1958a.Google Scholar
  13. Cattell, R. B. A need for alertness to multivariate experimental findings in integrative surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 1958b, 55, 253–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattell, R. B. The dynamic calculus: Concepts and crucial experiments. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium of motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1959, pp. 84–134.Google Scholar
  15. Cattell, R. B., and Scheier, I. H. Stimuli related to stress, neuroticism, excitation, and anxiety response patterns: Illustrating a new multivariate experimental design. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattell, R. B., and Scheier, I. H. The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  17. Coan, R. W. Basic forms of covariation and concomitance designs. Psychological Bulletin, 1961, 58, 317–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, M. R., and Nagel, E. An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1934.Google Scholar
  19. Digman, J. M. The principal dimensions of child personality as inferred from teachers’ judgments. Child Development, 1963, 34, 43–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Drevdahl, J. E., and Cattell, R. B. Personality and creativity in artists and writers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1958, 14, 107–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffy, E. Activation and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  22. Estes, W. K. Modern learning theory. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts, 1954.Google Scholar
  23. Feigl, M., and Brodbeck, M. Readings in the philosophy of science. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts, 1953.Google Scholar
  24. Feigl, M., and Sellars, W. Readings in philosophical analysis. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts, 1953.Google Scholar
  25. French, J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychological Monographs, No. 5, 1951a.Google Scholar
  26. French, J. W. The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951b.Google Scholar
  27. Hampson, S. E., John, O. P., and Goldberg, L. R. Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 37–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henrysson, S. Applicability of factor analysis in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksells, 1957.Google Scholar
  29. Hundleby, J. D., Pawlik, K., and Cattell, R. B. Personality factors in objective test devices. San Diego: R. Knapp, 1965.Google Scholar
  30. Kretschmer, E. The psychology of men of genius. Translated by R. B. Cattell. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.Google Scholar
  31. Lachman, R. The model in theory construction. Psychological Review, 1960, 67, 113–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leeper, R. W. Theoretical methodology in the psychology of personality. In M. Marx (Ed.), Theories in contemporary psychology. New York: Macmillan Co., 1963, pp. 389–413.Google Scholar
  33. Lindsley, D. B. The reticular motivating system and perceptual integration. In D. E. Sheer (Ed.), Electrical stimulation of the brain. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  34. Madsen, K. B. Theories of motivation. Cleveland: Howard Allen, 1961.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, M. (Ed.). Theories in contemporary psychology. New York: Macmillan Co., 1963.Google Scholar
  36. Mulaik, S. A. Striking the balance between exploratory and confirmatory methods in structural analysis: Is there a balance? Paper at the Annual APA Meeting, August 31, 1987.Google Scholar
  37. Norman, W. T. Validation of personality tests as measures of trait-rating factors. USAF PRL, Tech. Doc. Rep. No. 62–4, 1962.Google Scholar
  38. Norman, W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1963, 66, 574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osgood, C. E., and Suci, G. J. A measure of relation determined by both mean difference and profile information. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 49, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan Co., 1953.Google Scholar
  41. Spearman, C. The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan Co., 1927.Google Scholar
  42. Stevens, S. S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, C. W., and Barron, F. Scientific creativity. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  44. Tupes, E. C. Relationships between behavior trait ratings by peers and later officer performance of USAF Officer Candidate School graduates. Lackland AFB, Tex.: USAF Personnel and Training Research Center, Rep. No. AFPTRC-TN-57–125 (ASTIA Doc. No. 134257), 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond B. Cattell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations