Concrete Dam Performance and Remedial Measures

  • Charles F. Corns
  • Giovanni Lombardi
  • Robert B. Jansen

Abstract

Portland cement concrete is inherently durable. Still, some concrete dams may need to be improved because of deficiencies in their design and construction, or as a result of environmental attack. Older dams may suffer from a combination of effects. Common problems include alkali-aggregate reaction, freezing and thawing, leaching, and sulfate attack. Infiltration by aggressive waters may remove essential constituents from the concrete. Soft water moving at a relatively high velocity under pressure may be very detrimental. The extent of deterioration will vary with the composition of the aggregate and that of the cement. Absorptive aggregates may be susceptible to freeze-thaw damage. Where structural cracking has occurred so that water is freely admitted, the effects of leaching and freeze-thaw cycling may be intensified.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lombardi, G., Les barrages en voûte mince, Dunod, Paris 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaech, A., and Lombardi, G., “Einige Betrachtungen über Bogenstaumauern,” Schweizerische Bauzeitung, Nr. 38, 1953.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mary, M., “Historique Accidents et Incidents,” Construction et Surveillance des Barrages, I. Barrages-voûtes, Dunod, Paris 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Comité français des Grands Barrages, “Désordres graves constatés sur des barrages français,” 13th ICOLD Congress, New Delhi, 1979, Q.49–R.33.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Group of the Swiss National Committee on Large Dams, “Maintenance and Rehabilitation Connected with Swiss Dams over Fifty Years Old,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. IV, pp. 781–797, June 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDowell, T. E., “Grouting of Willow Creek Dam and Foundation,” Newsletter, U.S. Committee on Large Dams, Nov. 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lukajic, B., Smith, G., and Deans, J., “Application of Asphalt Grout in Treatment of Dam Leakage,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. V, pp. 13–19, June 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vallino, G., and Forzano, G., “Design Criteria for Improvement of the Concrete Buttresses of Corbara Dam,” Transactions, Fourteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Vol. I, pp. 513–541, May 1982.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muzas, F., Campos, J. M., and Yges, L., “Regeneration of Cracked Concrete in Dams by Injection of Synthetic Resins,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. II, pp. 547–555, June 1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urbistondo, R., and Yges, L., “Fragmentation of the El Atazar Dam Foundation Rock after 14 years in Operation,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. IV, pp. 673–692, June 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Work Group of the Portuguese National Commission on Large Dams, “Cracking and Repair Works in Cabril Dam,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. II, pp. 367–387, June 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swiss National Committee on Large Dams, “General Paper (Zeu-zier),” 15th ICOLD Congress, Lausanne, 1985, GP-RS.9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swiss National Committee on Large Dams, “Abnormal Behaviour of Zeuzier Arch-Dam (Switzerland),” special issue of Wasser, Energie, Luft, Apr. 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pougatsch, H., “Unexpected Behaviour of a Large Arch-Dam in Switzerland,” 14th ICOLD Congress, Rio de Janeiro, 1982, Q.52–R.40.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneider, T. R., “Geological Aspects of the Extraordinary Behaviour of Zeuzier Arch-Dam,” 14th ICOLD Congress, Rio de Janeiro, 1982, Q.53–R.38.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berchten, A. R., “Repair of the Zeuzier Arch Dam in Switzerland,”Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. II, pp. 693–711, June 1985.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pepper, A., and Anderson, D., “Chichester Dam Rehabilitation,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. IV, pp. 587–602, June 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lane, R. G. T., “The Jetting and Grouting of Fissured Quartzite at Kariba,” Proceedings, Conference on Grouts, British National Society on Soil Mechanics, London, pp. 85–90, 1963.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barton, N., and Bandis, S., “Effect of Block Size on the Shear Behavior of Jointed Rock,” Proceedings of the 23rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, AIME, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barton, N., and Choubey, V., “The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice,” Journal, Rock Mechanics, The International Society for Rock Mechanics, Vol. 10, No. 1–2, pp. 1–54, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicholson, Glenn A., “Design of Gravity Dams on Rock Foundations: Sliding Stability Assessment by Limit Equilibrium and Selection of Shear Strength Parameters,” Technical Report GL-83–13, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deere, D. U., “Dams on Rock Foundations—Some Design Questions,” Rock Engineering for Foundations and Slopes, Proceedings, Specialty Conference, ASCE, Geotechnical Engineering Division, Boulder, CO, Vol. 2, pp. 55–85, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sporn, Philip, “Research on Concrete Growth,” The Collected Works of Philip Sporn, Vistas in Electric Power, Vol. 2, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, 1968.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Legge, W. C. S., “Modification of Vaal and Loerie Dams to Modern Safety Standards,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. IV, pp. 343–357, June 1985.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alvarez, A., Herrero, E., and Buil, J. M., “Strengthening of Some Existing Dams,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. IV, pp. 505–526, June 1985.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demmer, W., and Ludescher, H., “Measures Taken to Reduce Uplift and Seepage at Kölnbrein Dam,” Transactions, Fifteenth Congress, International Commission on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, Vol. III, pp. 1371–1394, June 1985.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Craddock, C. D., “Upstream Drainage Increases Spillway Stability,” ASCE National Water Resources Engineering Meeting, Jan. 29-Feb. 2, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles F. Corns
    • 1
  • Giovanni Lombardi
    • 2
  • Robert B. Jansen
    • 3
  1. 1.SpringfieldUSA
  2. 2.LocarnoSwitzerland
  3. 3.BellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations