Advertisement

Field-Matter Interactions in Photonic Bandgaps

  • G. Kurizki
Conference paper

Abstract

Inhibition of spontaneous emission (ISE) has been demonstrated in the past for molecules near a reflecting surface1 and for Rydberg atoms in microwave cavities.2 In these systems the destructive interference imposed by the boundary conditions on spontaneous emission is sensitive to microscopic changes in the location of the emitter or in the cavity size, as well as to emitters’ polarization.3 Recently, the possibility of obtaining ISE in spectral bands of forbidden light propagation (photonic bandgaps) has been suggested by Yablonovitch.4 These bandgaps are spectral regions admitting only complex wavevectors k (evanescent waves) in any direction, and bounded by frequencies ωmax(min) which the dispersion curve ω(k) becomes discontinuous. Because they are associated with definite k (band edges), such bandgaps are delocalized in space, i.e., they inhibit spontaneous emission independently of the spatial distribution of emitters in the system. The systems that have been proposed4 for the demonstration of bandgaps are dielectric superlattices that exhibit strong three-dimensional (3D) periodic modulations of the dielectric index with a period comparable to half the emission wavelength. The consideration of bandgaps is motivated also by the quest for strong localization of light, i.e., local modes extending over distances of the order of a wavelength. Such modes are predicted by John to occur near the edge of photonic bandgaps in partially disordered structures.5 They can be produced by point or line “defects” altering the strength or periodicity of the dielectric index, or by a “phase slip” in the dielectric superlattice, which is the 3D analog of phase delays introduced into one-dimensional periodic gratings in distributed-feedback lasers.4

Keywords

Spontaneous Emission Photonic Bandgaps Rydberg Atom Dielectric Index Dielectric Superlattices 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.H. Drexhage, in Progress in Optics, ed. E. Wolfe (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974 ), Vol. 12, p. 165.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.G. Hulet, E.S. Hilfer and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2137 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.W. Milonni and P.L. Knight, Opt.Commun. 9, 119 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Yablonovitch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. John, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2486 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Kurizki and A.Z. Genack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2269 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.S. Agarwal, Quantum Statistical Theories of Spontaneous Emission ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Ise, T. Okubo, M. Sugimura, K. Ito and H.J. Nolte, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 536 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.Y. Bigot and B. Hönerlage, Phys. Stat. Sol. (B) 121, 649 (1984); 124, 221 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Abram, Phys. Rev. B 29, 4480 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.B. Grun, B. Hönerlage and R. Levy, Sol. St. Commun. 46, 51 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.W. Boyd, M.G. Raymer, P. Narum and D.J. Harter, Phys. Rev. A 24, 411 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Dagenais and W.F. Sharfin, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1179 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.P. Agarwal, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 147 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kurizki
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Physics Dept.Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations