Technological Change and the Human Aspect

  • A. J. Dimond
  • R. K. Ellis


This paper has emanated from an increasing concern over the lack of association of new technology with the behavioural aspects of individuals in organisations. A foundation is presented, from which we argue against the redundancy of the individual in relation to technological change. Johns (1970) argues that change is a constant feature in organisations and, as such, organisational success depends on treating technological change as a human relations problem as well as a technical problem, which negates the idea that change processes appear as isolated phenomena. Our purpose is to get away from the concept that new technology initiates the change processes, and to develop an understanding to see how change is managed by the integration of individuals and the new technology in organisations. We set out the basis for this work and identify an area for future research in systems science.


Human Behaviour Technological Change Change Process System Science Physical World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashby, R., 1970, Analysis of the system to be modeled in: “The Process of Model Building in the Behavioural Sciences1”, R. Stodgill, ed., Ohio State University Press: 94.Google Scholar
  2. Blackler, F. H. M., and Brown, C. A., 1986, Alternative yodels to guide the design and implementation of new information technologies into work organizations, J. Occup. Psych., 59: 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloor, D., 1984, A sociological theory of objectivity, in; “Objectivity and Cultural Divergence”, S. C. Brown, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 229.Google Scholar
  4. Boddy, D., and Buchanan, D. A., 1986, “Managing New Technology”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Burrell, G., and Morgan, G., 1979, “Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis”, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. S., 1968, The mathematical study of change, in: “Methodology in Social Research”, H. M. Blalock, Jr., and A. B. Blalock, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, D., Banfield, T., and Sheahan, R., 1976, “The Humane Technologist”, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Elizur, D., and Guttman, L., 1976, The structure of attitudes toward work and technological change within an organization, Admin. Sci. Quart., 21: 611.Google Scholar
  9. El Sawy, O. A., and Pauchant, T. C., 1988, “Triggers, Templates and Twitches in the Tracking of Emerging Strategic Issues”, Working Paper 88.14, Laval University, Graduate School of Administrative Sciences, Quebec.Google Scholar
  10. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., 1975, “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: an Introduction to Theory and Research”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R., 1988, “Dealing with Complexity: an Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science”, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R., 1988, “Dealing with Complexity: an Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science”, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Johns, E. A., 1970, “The Sociology of Organizational Change”, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L., 1966, “The Social Psychology of Organizations”, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Keen, P. G. W., 1981, Information systems and organizational change, Comm. ACM, 24 (1): 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly, G., 1955, “The Psychology of Personal Constructs”, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Lehman, H., 1979, “Introduction to the Philosophy of Mathematics”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Linstone, H. A., 1983, On the management of technology: old and new perspectives, Pt. 1, Dynamica(Summer) 10 (11): 24.Google Scholar
  19. Linstone, H. A., and Simmonds, W. H. C., 1977, “Futures Research, New Directions”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  20. M’Pherson, P. K., and Limantoro, E. S., 1982, A process model of technological efficiency and improvement in socio-economic systems, Prog. Cybern. Sys. Res., 10: 17.Google Scholar
  21. McGinn, R. E., 1978, What is technology?, in: “Research in Philosophy and Technology”, P. T. Durbin and C. Mitcham, eds., JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1: 179,Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, S. A., and Flood, R. L., 1987, “Investigating Theoretical Linguistics as a Structural Analogy to Heuristic Methodology”, Research Memorandum, DSS/SAR-RLF/249, Department of Systems Science, City University, London.Google Scholar
  23. Rosen, R., 1985, “Anticipatory Systems, Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations”, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Sachs, W. M., 1977, Some thoughts on the mathematical method and futures problems, in: “Futures Research, New Directions”, H. A. Linstone and W. H. C. Simmonds, eds., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA: 164.Google Scholar
  25. Sahal, D., 1979, “Recent Advances in a Theory of Technological Change”, Discussion Paper Series 79-11, International Institute of Management Science Centre, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Dimond
    • 1
  • R. K. Ellis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems ScienceCity UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations