Marr-Hildreth Enhancement of NDE Images

  • B. G. Frock
  • P. Karpur


Previous publications [1–5] have demonstrated the usefulness of digital image enhancement techniques for improving visual detection and resolution of features in NDE images. Many of the techniques are high-pass spatial domain convolution filters [6] which are used to enhance the appearance of edges by removing blur. Two of the major advantages of the more popular edge enhancement operators are their ease of implementation and their rapidity of execution [7]. This makes them very useful for rapid “screening” of images. Their major disadvantages are that they emphasize “noise” as well as edges, and some are directionally dependent operators which tend to suppress features that are not aligned in the “preferred” direction.


Spatial Domain Point Spread Function High Spatial Frequency Fourier Amplitude Spectrum Ultrasonic Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. G. Frock and R. W. Martin, “Applications of Digital Image Enhancement Techniques for Improved Ultrasonic Imaging of Defects in Composite Materials,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 6A, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, (Plenum Press, New York, New York, 1987), pp. 781–789.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. J. Closier, “Automatic Product Analysis Using X-Rays,” NDT International, 59–65 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. H. Jacoby, R. S. Loe and P. A. Dondes, “Computer Evaluation of Real-Time X-Ray arid Acoustic Images,” SPIE, Applications of Digital Image Processing IV, Vol. 359, 273–277 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Boutin and C. Forget, “Powerful Image Analysis Techniques for Quantitative Measurements of Materials,” Metal Progress, April 1988, pp. 24–55.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. S. Gilmore, R. E. Joynson, C. R. Trzaskos and J. D. Young, “Accoustic Microscopy: Materials Art and Materials Science,” Review of progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 6A, edited by D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, (Plenum Press, New York, New York, 1987), pp. 553–562.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. S. Davis, “A Survey of Edge Detection Techniques,” Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 4, 1975, pp. 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. N. Venetsanopoulos and V. Cappellini, “Real-Time Image Processing,” Multidimensional Systems, Techniques and Applications, edited by S. G. Tzafestas (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1986), pp. 3345–399.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. C. Gonzalez and P. Wintz, Digital Image Processing (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1977), pp. 210–211.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Marr and E. Hildreth, “Theory of Edge Detection,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Vol. 207, 1980, pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. L. Hall, R. P. Kruger, S. J. Dwyer, D. L. Hall, R. W. McLaren and G. S. Lodwick, “A Survey of Preprocessing and Feature Extraction Techniques for Radiographic Images,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-20, No. 9, September 1971, pp. 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. G. Frock
    • 1
  • P. Karpur
    • 2
  1. 1.Research InstituteUniversity of DaytonDaytonUSA
  2. 2.Systran CorporationDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations