Ultrasonic Beam Propagation in Cast Stainless Steel

  • B. P. Newberry
  • A. Minachi
  • R. B. Thompson


The ultrasonic examination of cast stainless steel components found in nuclear reactors has been plagued by problems such as difficulties in achieving sufficient penetration, poor signal-to-noise ratios, false indications, and mislocated flaws. One factor which plays an important role in these problems is anisotropy of the material, whereas many metal components can be viewed as isotropic, having randomly oriented, equi-axed grains, such is not the case for cast austenitic steels, in which the structure tends to crystallize with the [100]-axis of each grain parallel to the local thermal gradient. A consequence is that the ultrasonic wave speeds vary with direction, which in turn leads to such phenomena as beam skewing and excess beam divergence. The materials, anisotropic or not, can also exhibit large grain sizes which can lead to excess attenuation and background noise. Much effort has been placed on classifying the various microstructures and determining their elastic properties as well as studying beam propagation through them [1–8]. The theoretical modeling of beam propagation in anisotropic and inhomogeneous materials has also received much attention recently [9–16].


Shear Wave Critical Angle Beam Propagation Slowness Surface Slowness Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. R. Dewey, L. Adler, R. T. King, K. V. Cook, Exper. Mechanics 17, 420 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Tomlinson, A. Wagg, M. Whittle, in NDE in the Nuclear Industry, R. Natesh, Ed., (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1978), p. 64.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. S. Kupperman and K. J. Reimann, ibid, p. 369.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Adler, K. V. Cook, D. W. Fitting, in Ultrasonic Materials Characterization, H. Berger and M. Linzer, Eds., NBS Special Pub. 596, (NBS, Gaithersburg), p. 533.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Jeong, Ultrasonic Characterization of Centrifugally Cast Stainless Steel, NP-5246, (EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. S. Good and L. G. Van Fleet, in Review of Progress in QNDE 7, D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, Eds., (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 637.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. S. Good, E. R. Green, S. R. Doctor, in these proceedings.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Jeong and F. Ammirato, in these proceedings.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. A. Ogilvy, in Review of Progress in QNDE 7, D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, Eds., (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. You, R. L. Ludwig, W. Lord, ibid, p. 23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. L. Rose, A. Pilarski, K. Balasubramanium, J. Dale, D. Diprimeo, ibid, p. 85.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Norris, ibid, p. 41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. A. Roberts and D. S. Kupperman, ibid, p. 49.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. B. Thompson and B. P. Newberry, ibid, p. 31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. A. Ogilvy, Ultrasonics 24, 337 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Norris, Wave Motion 9, 1 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. B. Thompson, T. A. Gray, J. H. Rose, V. G. Kogan, E. F. Lopes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1818, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. B. Thompson, and E. F. Lopes, in Review of Progress in QNDE 5, D. O. Thompson, and D. E. Chimenti, Eds., (Plenum, New York, 1986), p. 117.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Kriz and P. Heyliger, in these proceedings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. P. Newberry
    • 1
  • A. Minachi
    • 1
  • R. B. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Ames LaboratoryIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations