Adhesive Joint Characterization by Leaky Guided Interface Waves

  • Peter B. Nagy
  • Laszlo Adler


Ultrasonic inspection of adhesive joints is usually done either by normally incident longitudinal or shear waves or by Lamb modes propagating along the joint, i.e. in the adherend-adhesive-adherend sandwich as a whole. This paper discusses the feasibility of using guided interface waves propagating in the adhesive layer itself for nondestructive evaluation of bond quality. This layer is usually less than 5% of the whole joint, but all defects are expected in this region or on its boundary. True guided interface waves are probably the most sensitive to bond imperfections [1,2], but they are inherently very difficult to generate and detect, therefore we should settle for the second best, namely leaky guided interface waves which lend themselves quite easily to practical applications. The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the superior sensitivity of the suggested leaky guided interface wave technique over the more conventional Lamb wave inspection via examples of adhesive joints with different cohesive and adhesive type defects.


Adhesive Layer Adhesive Bond Lamb Wave Adhesive Joint Mode Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.I. Rokhlin, M. Hefets, and M. Rosen “An elastic interface wave guided by a thin film between two solids,” J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3579–3582 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.I. Rokhlin, M. Hefets, and M. Rosen “An ultrasonic interface-wave method for predicting the strength of adhesive bonds,” J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2847–2851 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.B. Nagy, W.R. Rose, and L. Adler “A single transducer broadband technique for leaky Lamb wave detection,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1987), Vol. 6A, pp. 483–490.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.A. Alers and R.B. Thompson, “Application of trapped modes in layered media to the testing of adhesive bonds,” 1976 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, IEEE Cat. #76 CH1120–5SU, 138–142 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.A. Budenkov, Y.V. Volegov, N.G. Chenepkova, and T.A. Guntina “Dispersion relation for interface waves in a three-layered medium,” Sov. J. Nondestr. Test. 272–276 (1977).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Pilarski, J.L. Rose, and K. Balasabramaniam “On a plate-surface wave mode selection criteria for ultrasonic evaluation in layered structures,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, S21 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.A. Simpson “Guided elastic interface waves for ceramic joint evaluation,” in this proceedings.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Tolstoy and E. Usdin “Dispersive properties of stratified elastic and liquid media: A ray theory,” Geophysics 18, 844–870 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.M. Brekhovskikh, Waves in Layered Media, (Academic Press, New York, 1980), 2nd edition, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.C.M. Li and K.H. Yen “Elastic waves guided by a solid layer between adjacent substrates,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques MTT-20, 477–486 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.C.H. Guyott and P. Cawley “The ultrasonic vibration characteristics of adhesive joints,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 632–640 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Cawley and M.J. Hodson, “The NDT of adhesive joints using ultrasonic spectroscopy,” in this proceedings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Nagy
    • 1
  • Laszlo Adler
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations