Abstract
The Conference in Cambridge on Operational Research and the Social Sciences — “The 1964 Conference” — with the Conference book containing the text of the papers and a very adequate account of the proceedings and discussions (Lawrence 1966) — in retrospect marks the high point in the relationship between O.R. and social science. The theme was chosen for the Operational Research Society’s first international conference because of widespread recognition of the need for better integration of the closely related interests, needs and resources of O.R. and various social sciences (see especially “Editor’s Preface” in Lawrence 1966). John Lawrence’s account of these needs is as valid and important now as when it was written. The calibre of the participants was outstanding; so was the quality of the papers and discussions. Today, most of the papers are well worth re-reading; several continue to be of real importance. The present paper owes much to that Conference, as background and still more as stimulus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Heald, Gordon, ed., 1970, “Approaches to the Study of Organizational Behaviour”, Tavistock Publications, London.
Langland, William, c. 1370, “Piers the Plowman”, translation into modern English by J.F. Goodridge, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx.
Lawrence, J.R., ed., 1966, “Operational Research and the Social Sciences”, Tavistock Publications, London.
Smith, Cyril S., 1987, Networks of influence: the social sciences in Britain since the War, in “Social Science Research and Government: Comparative Essays on Britain and the United States”, M. Bulmer, ed., Cambridge University Press, London.
Stansfield, R.G., 1978, O.R. and anthropology, note for O.R. Society Seminar, O.R. in Developing Countries, 27 October 1978, The Society, Birmingham.
Stansfield, R.G., 1979, Typing Pools: a study in satisfaction in work, in“Satisfactions in Work Design: Ergonomics and Other Approaches”, R.G. Sell and Patricia Shipley, eds., Taylor & Francis, London.
Stansfield, R.G., 1981a, Operational research and sociology: a case- study of cross-fertilizations in the growth of useful science, Science and Public Policy, 8: 262.
Stansfield, R.G., 1981b, Quis custodiet?, OR newsletter, 10: 8.
Stansfield, R.G., 1986, The place of observation in OR methodology or, when and where do OR workers observe?, paper given at Eighth European Conference on Operational Research, Lisbon, Portugal, deposited at British Library Document Supply Centre, Boston Spa.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stansfield, R.G. (1989). O.R. and Social Sciences: A Story of ON-OFF Relationships. In: Jackson, M.C., Keys, P., Cropper, S.A. (eds) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0789-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8083-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0789-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive