Skip to main content

Spin Observables in Exclusive Electron Scattering

  • Chapter
Spin Observables of Nuclear Probes
  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

Experimental studies of both inclusive and exclusive quasielastic electron scattering have yielded results which have, so far, defied explanation within the context of traditional nuclear theory. In the case of the inclusive reaction, the difficulties lie in the experimentally observed suppression of the longitudinal response and in the region of the “dip” between the quasielastic and resonance peaks in the transverse response.1 In the case of the exclusive reactions, which have so far been limited to the (e,e’p) reaction using certain restricted choices of kinematics, the difficulty is the observation of insufficient spectral response2 and in the description of the missing energy spectrum of the longitudinal and transverse response functions3. These difficulties have led to a considerable amount of theoretical activity in improving the application of traditional many-body methods to the description of these reactions, and in the application of more exotic models involving relativistic dynamics 4,5,6 or quark degrees of freedom. 7,8,9 So far these efforts have resulted in varying degrees of success and continued work in these areas will be required for the foreseeable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Altemus et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 965 (1980)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Barreau et al., Nucl. Phys. A402. 515 (1983)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Deady et al., Phys. Rev. C28, 631 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z.-E. Meziani et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2130 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Deady et al., Phys. Rev. C33, 1897 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. C. Blatchley et al., Phys. Rev. C34, 1243 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Frullani and J. Mougey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 14, 1 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. E. Ulmer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1375 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. de Forest, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 895 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Do Dang and N. Van Giai, Phys. Rev. C30, 731 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. R. Chinn and J. W. Van Orden, Bull. Am Phys. Soc. 32, 1030 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. V. Nobel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 412 (1981); Phys. Lett. B178, 285 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. S. Celenza, A. Rosenthal, and C. M. Shakin, Phys. Rev. Lett 53, 892 (1984); Phys. Rev. C31, 232 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. Lett 54, 2560 (1985); Nucl. Phys. A459, 525 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. A. McNeil, J. R. Shepard, and S. J. Wallace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1429 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Shepard, J. A. McNeil and S. J. Wallace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1443 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. C. Clark, S. Hama, R. L. Mercer, L. Ray, and B. D. Serot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1644 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Picklesimer, P. C. Tandy, R. M. Thaler, and D. H. Wolfe, Phys. Rev. C29, 1582 (1984); 30, 1861 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. V. Hynes, A. Picklesimer, P. C. Tandy, and R. M. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 978 (1984); Phys. Rev. C31, 1438 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Fabian and H. Arenhovel, Nucl. Phys. A314. 253 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Picklesimer and J. W. Van Orden, Phys. Rev. C35, 266 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. The term “parallel-antiparallel kinematics” is conventionally used to denote the relative orientation of the recoil momentum \({{\vec{P}}_{R}}\) with respect to the momentum transfer \(\vec{q}\).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Picklesimer, J. W. Van Orden and S.J. Wallace, Phys. Rev C32, 1312 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. J. Horowitz and D. D. Serot, Nucl. Phys. A368, 503 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Orden, J.W. (1988). Spin Observables in Exclusive Electron Scattering. In: Horowitz, C.J., Goodman, C.D., Walker, G.E. (eds) Spin Observables of Nuclear Probes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0769-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0769-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8073-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0769-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics