The Random Phase Transducer : A New Tool for Scattering Medium

  • M. Fink
  • F. Cancre
  • D. Beudon
  • C. Soufflet
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 16)

Abstract

In pulse echo measurement, interference between scatterers observed with a coherent transducer, leads to scalloping in spectral estimation (attenuation measurement) and to speckle noise in envelope detection (imaging).

In order to get rid of these effects, Miller has proposed phase insensitive transducers (CdS transducer and array of point like detectors). These transducers have shown promising results, but suffer from a lack of sensitivity.

We have developed a new approach to control the degree of spatial coherence of ultrasonic transducers.

Random Phase (R.P.) transducers consist in one or two rotating random phase screens (R.P.S.) located in front of a coherent transducer. The ultrasonic beam generated by the transducer is then transmited and received through the moving R.P.S.. Spectral analysis and envelope detection are processed by averaging the data on a set of locations of the R.P.S. Optimal choice of the location of the R.P.S. will be discussed in order to get spectral smoothing and speckle reduction. Experimental results will shown the strong efficiency of the R.P. transducer in attenuation measurement of tissue like phantom and in low constrast specular reflector detection.

Keywords

Graphite Attenuation Foam Rubber Coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Kuc, Bounds on estimating the acoustic attenuation of small tissue regions from reflected ultrasound, Proc. IEEE. 73:1159 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Fink, F. Hottier and J.F. Cardoso, Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurements: short time Fourier Analysis, Ultrasonic Imaging. 5: 117 (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.B. Burckhardt, Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics. SU-25: 1 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.F. Wagner, S.W. Smith, J.M. Sandrik and H. Lopez, Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics. 30:156–163 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.F. Wagner, M.F. Insana and S.W. Smith, Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency control. (to be published).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.A. Magnin, O.T. Von Ramm and F.L. Thurstone, Frequency compounding for speckle contrast reduction in phased array images, Ultrasonic Imaging. 4: 267 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.E. Trahey, J.W. Allison, S.W. Smith and O.T. Von Ramm, A quantitative approach to speckle reduction via frequency compounding, Ultrasonic Imaging. 8: 151 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.P. Shattuck and O.T. Von Ramm, Compound scanning with a phased array, Ultrasonic Imaging. 4: 93 (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.E. Trakey, S.W. Smith and O.T. Von Ramm, Speckle pattern correlation with lateral aperture translation : experimental results and implications for spatial compounding, IEEE trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency control. 33:257 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L.J. Busse and J.G. Miller, Detection of Spatially non uniform Ultrasonic Radiation with phase sensitive and phase Insensitive Receivers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.. 70:1377 (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.H. Johnston and J.G. Miller, A comparaison of backscatter measured by phase sensitive and phase insensitive detection, Proc. IEEE ultrasonics symposium. 827 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Fink
    • 1
  • F. Cancre
    • 1
  • D. Beudon
    • 1
  • C. Soufflet
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Physique des Solides de l’E.N.S.Université ParisParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations