Skip to main content

Nuclear Reprogramming in Bovine Embryos after Nuclear Transplantation

  • Chapter
Nuclear Structure and Function
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

A fundamental and still unsolved problem concerning the developmental process of eukaryotic organisms is whether differentiated cells ration the genomic totipotency of the zygote nucleus (DiBerardino, 1988). There are probably differences among mammalian species in the extent to which nuclei from early embryos are able to support development after transfer to an enucleated egg. Mouse embryos initiate transcription of heterogenous nuclear RNA (hnRNA) at the early 2 cell stage (Flach et al., 1982) and nuclear totipotency in mouse is lost at the time of embryonic genome activitation (McGrath and Solter, 1984). On the other hand, sheep embryos initiate transcription at the 8 to 16 cell stage (Crosby et al., 1988), and blastomere nuclei of these embryonic stages (Willadsen, 1986) and even of ICM stage (Smith and Wilmut, 1989) are able to support development to term, when fused to enucleated oocytes. Similarly, in cattle embryos transcription starts at the 8 cell stage (Camous et al., 1986), and blastomere nuclei of 8 – 16 cell stage (Prather et al., 1987) and even of 32 cell stage (Marx, 1988) are totipotent. The question arises as to what processes on the ultrastructural and molecular level are responsible for reprogramming the mammalian embryonal nucleus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Camous S., Kopecny V., and Fléchon J.-E. 1986, Autoradiographic detection of the earliest stage of /3H/-urdine incorporation into the cow embryo, Biol. Cell., 58:95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby I. M., Gandolfi F., and Moor R. M. 1988, Control of protein synthesis during early cleavage of sheep embryos, J. Reprod. Fertil., 82:769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet N., Kanka J., Motlik J., and Fulka J. 1986, Nucleolar fine structure and RNA synthesis in bovine oocytes from antral follicles, Gamete Res., 14:65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiBerardion M. A. 1988, Genomic multipotentiality of differentiated somatic cells, in: ‘Regulatory Mechanisms in Developmental Processes’, G. Eguchi, T. S. Okada and L Saxen, eds., Elsevier Sei. Publ. Ireland, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flach G., Johnson M. H., Braude P. R., Taylor R. A. S., and Bolton V. N. 1982, The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2-cell mouse embryo, EMBO 1:681.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett K., Barton Sh. C, and Surani M. A. 1987, Nuclear cytoplasmic interactions following nuclear transplantation in mouse embryos, Development, 101:915.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marx J. L. 1988, Cloning in sheep and cattle embryos, Science, 239:463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath J., and Solter D. 1984, Inability of mouse blastomere nuclei transferred to encleated zygotes to support development in-vitro, Science, 226:1317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlok A., Torner H., Motlik J., Fulka J., Kauffold P., and Duschinski U. 1988, Fertilization of bovine oocytes in vitro: effect of different sources of gametes in fertilization rate and frequency of fertilization anomalies, Anim. Reprod. Sei., 16:207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prather R. S., Barnes F. L., Sims M. M., Robl J. M., Eyestone W. H., and First N. L. 1987, Nuclear transplantation in the bovine embryo: assessment of donor nuclei and recipient oocyte, Biol. Reprod., 37:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L. C., and Wilmut L. 1989, Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation, Biol. Reprod., 40:1027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stice S. L., and Robl J. M. 1988, Nuclear reprogramming in nuclear trans-plant rabbit embryo, Biol. Reprod., 39:657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szöllösi M. S., and Szöllösi D. 1988 ’,Blebbing’ of the nuclear envelope of mouse zygotes, early embryos and hybrid cells, J. Cell Sei., 91:257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarkowski A. K. 1977, In vitro development of haploid mouse embryos produced by bisection of one-cell fertilized eggs, J. Embryol. exp. Morphol., 38:187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willadsen S. M. 1986, Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos, Nature (Lond), 320:63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kanka, J., Fulka, J., Fulka, J. (1990). Nuclear Reprogramming in Bovine Embryos after Nuclear Transplantation. In: Harris, J.R., Zbarsky, I.B. (eds) Nuclear Structure and Function. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0667-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0667-2_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7918-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0667-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics