Skip to main content

Explanation in the Psychology of Personality

  • Chapter
Annals of Theoretical Psychology

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 6))

Abstract

During an informal presentation given for interested departmental colleagues several years ago, I characterized personality psychology as a discipline concerned to provide theoretically based explanations for and hence an understanding of the behavior/psychological functioning of individuals. Immediately, a colleague with scholarly interests in the area of sensation/perception challenged the adequacy of my circumscription of the field on the grounds that, in the final analysis, it would fail to differentiate the study of personality from various other subdisciplines of psychology. Conceding that he was probably correct on this point, I hastened to add that, for reasons once well put by Gordon Allport, that prospect did not particularly trouble me:

Every mental function is embedded in personal life. In no concrete sense is there such a thing as intelligence, space perception, color discrimination, or choice reaction; there are only people who are capable of performing such activities and of having such experiences (Allport, 1937, p. 18).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W, & Odbert, H. S. (1936). TYait names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, (211).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher, & W B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 241–301). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1944). Psychological measurement: Normative, ipsative, interactive. Psychological Review, 51, 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, A. J. (1983). Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist: Some critical evidence on the diabolical quality of subjective psychometrics. Journal of Personality, 51, 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, R. (1987). Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWaele, J. P. (1985). The significance of action psychology for personality research and assessment. In J. P. Ginsburg, M. Brenner, & M. von Cranach (Eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action (pp. 115–170). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues in the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesbach, S. (1984). The “personality” of personality theory and research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 446–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D. W. (1978). Cosmopolitan constructs and provincial observations: Some prescriptions for a chronically ill specialty. In H. London (Ed.), Personality: A new look at metatheories (pp. 21–43). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1981). The positivist-empiricist approach and its alternative. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human Inquiry (pp. 3–17). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, D. T, & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B. (1967). Personality measurement: An introduction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 34 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T, & Durbeck, P. K. (1987). Whence cognitive prototypes in impression formation? Some empirical evidence for dialectical reasoning as a generative process. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8,223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T, Foss, M. A., Larsen, R. J., & Hempel, A. (1983). Studies in intuitive personology from an idiothetic point of view: Implications for personality theory. Journal of Personality, 51, 438–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T, Foss, M. A., Trierweiler, S. J., & Leffel, G. M. (1983). Toward a further understanding of the intuitive personologist: Some preliminary evidence for the dialectical quality of subjective personality impressions. Journal of Personality, 53,213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T, Trierweiler, S. J., & Foss, M. A. (1983). Theoretical vs. actuarial analyses of personality ratings, and other rudimentary distinctions. Journal of Personality, 51, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, B. A. (1969). Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology. American Psychologist, 41,1001–1003. (Comment).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress in soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1984). On reasons and causes. In J. R. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds.),Annals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 2, pp.157–163). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1985). Philosophy of psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1987). The logic of reductionist models. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York City, August, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G., & Widiger, T A. (1983). Personality structure and assessment. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 431–463). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. O. (1987). Personality: The scientific study of complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak, J. F. (1981a). A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Kreiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak, J. F. (1981b). Logical learning theory: Propositions, corollaries, and research evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 731–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, N. (1963). Personality: Its place in psychology. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of Science (Vol. 5, pp. 488–592). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Review, 79, 294–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. (1976). Personality. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology,(Vol. 27, pp. 1–27). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1983). In the spirit of Hegel. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1965). Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In S. S. Tbmkins & C. E. Izard (Eds.),Affect, cognition and personality (pp. 72–97). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L. (1978). Individuality: Human possibilities and personal choice in the psychological development of men and women. San Francisco: JosseyBass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woody, E. Z. (1983). The intuitive personologist revisited. A critique of dialectical person perception. Journal of Personality, 51, 236–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lamiell, J.T. (1990). Explanation in the Psychology of Personality. In: Robinson, D.N., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0631-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0631-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7901-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0631-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics