Recruitment and Frequency Coding of Diaphragm Motor Units During Ventilatory and Non-Ventilatory Behaviors

  • Gary C. Sieck

Abstract

The motor unit, comprised of an alpha motoneuron and the muscle fibers it innervates, is the final common pathway by which the nervous system controls muscle contractions. Since the pioneering studies of Sherrington (13), it has been recognized that the central nervous system controls the force generated by a muscle by changing the number of activated motor units (recruitment coding) or by modifying the discharge frequency of recruited units (frequency coding). In mixed muscles, motor units display a variety of contractile and fatigue properties (2). Thus, to accomplish different motor behaviors, the nervous system has a repertoire of units from which to select, For example, under conditions requiring prolonged force production, the nervous system might select to recruit only those units that are fatigue resistant. Under other conditions requiring shorts bursts of force, unit fatigue resistance might not be an important determinant in unit recruitment. Instead, more fatigable units, which typically generate greater forces might be selectively recruited. The nervous system might also select to increase force by increasing the discharge rate of those units already active.

Keywords

Fatigue Catheter Lactate Cage Respiration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agostini, E. and J. Mead. Statics of the respiratory system. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by W.O. Fenn and H. Rahn. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1964, Vol. I, sect. 3, pp. 387–409.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burke, R.E. Motor units: Anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In: Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control, edited by J. M. Brookhart and V.B. Mountcastle. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol., Soc., 1981, Vol. II, Part 1, sect. 1, pp. 345–422.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke, R.E., D.M. Levine, P. Tsairis, and F.E. Zajac, III. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J. Physiol. Lond. 234:723–748, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dick, T.E., F.J., Kong, and A.J. Berger. Correlation of recruitment order with axonal conduction velocity for supraspinally driven diaphragmatic motor units. J. Neurophysiol. 57:245–259, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleshman, J.W., J.B. Munson, G.W. Sypert, and W.A. Friedman. Rheobase, input resistance, and motor unit type in medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1326–1338, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fournier, M. and G.C. Sieck. Somatotopy in the segmental innervation of the cat diaphragm. J. Appl. Physiol 64:291–298, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fournier, M. and G.C. Sieck. Mechanical properties of muscle units in the cat diaphragm. J. Neurophysiol.. 59:1055–1066, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fournier, M. and G.C. Sieck. Topographical projections of phrenic motoneurons and motor unit territories in the cat diaphragm. In Respiratory Muscles and Their Neuromotor Control, edited by G.C. Sieck, S.C. Gandevia, and W.E. Cameron. New York, NY: Alan R.Liss, 1987, pp. 215–226.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henneman, E. and L.M. Mendell. Functional organization of motoneuron pool and its input. In: Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control, edited by J.M. Brookhart and V.B. Mountcastle. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1981, Vol. II, part 1, sect. 1, pp. 423–507.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilaire, G., P. Gauthier, and R. Monteau. Central respiratory drive and recruitment order of phrenic and inspiratory laryngeal motoneurones. Respiration Physiol. 51:341–359, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iscoe, S., J. Dankoff, R. Migicovsky, and C. Polosa. Recruitment and discharge frequency of phrenic motoneurones during inspiration. Respiration Physiol. 26:113–128, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jodkowski, J.S., F. Viana, T.E. Dick, and A.J. Berger. Electrical properties of phrenic motoneurons in the cat: correlation with inspiratory drive. J. Neurophysiol. 58:105–124, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lidell, E.G.T. and C.S. Sherrington. Recruitment and some other factors of reflex inhibition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 97:488–518, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sieck, G.C., Trelease, R.B., and Harper, R.M. Sleep influences on diaphragmatic motor unit discharge. Exp. Neurol. 85:316–335, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walmsley, B., J.A. Hodgson, and R.E. Burke. Forces produced by medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during locomotion in freely moving cats. J. Neurophysiol. 41: 1203–1216, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zajac, F.E. and J.S. Faden. Relationship among recruitment order, axonal conduction velocity, and muscle unit properties of type-identified motor units in cat plantaris muscle. J. Neurophysiol. 53:1303–1322, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zengel, J.E., S.A. Reid, G.W. Sypert, and J.B. Munson. Membrane electrical properties and prediction of motor unit type of medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 53: 1323–1344, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary C. Sieck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations