Wavelet Transform Signal Processing Applied to Ultrasonics

  • A. Abbate
  • J. Frankel
  • P. Das


The wavelet transform (WT) provides a new tool for processing transient signals and it can be considered as an alternative to the classical Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) for describing the time-frequency evolution of such signals. The purpose of the present paper is to provide an overview of the applicability of the wavelet transform to ultrasonic signal analysis. The WT will be briefly introduced with emphasis on the aspects which make it suitable for our applications. In particular the WT has been utilized to enhance the ultrasonic signal detection in presence of background noise, and the application of this technique for flaw detection will be presented. Improvements in detection were quantified using steel samples of different thickness and with simulated flaws. Furthermore, the self-adjusting window structure of the WT results in a time-scale representation of signals which can display the temporal variation of the spectral components with varying resolution. This property is extremely useful in the study of dispersive wave propagation, in particular for extracting the dispersion relation of the Pseudo-Lamb wave velocity in thin coatings. Numerical simulations and experimental results will be presented.


Flaw Detection Surface Acoustic Wave Mother Wavelet Ultrasonic Signal Group Delay Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Weiss, “Wavelets and wideband correlation processing”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 13–32, January, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.K. Chui, editor, Wavelets: an introduction to wavelets, Academic Press, NY 1992MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Daubechies, “Orthonormal basis of compactly supported wavelets,: Comm. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. XLI, pp. 909–996, 1988Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.M. Gammel, Ultrasonics 24, 279 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.G. Weiss, R.K. Young, and L.H. Sibul, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 850 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.A. Gray and R.B. Thompson, in Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol. 5A, eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum, New York, 1983), p. 911Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Zhu and J.P. Weight, “Adaptive signal processing techniques to improve ultrasonic flaw detection in highly-scattering materials,” Review of Progress in QNDE, vol. 13, pp. 817–824,1994Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.J. Howard and R.S. Gilmore, “Ultrasonic C-scan imaging for hard-alpha flaw detection and characterization,” Review of Progress in QNDE, vol. 13, pp. 763–770, 1994Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Abbate, J. Koay, J. Frankel, S.C. Schroeder and P. Das, “Application of Wavelet Transform Signal processor to Ultrasound,” Proc. IEEE Ultrasonic Symp. Vol. 94 CH3468–6, pp. 1147–1152, 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Önsay and A. G. Haddow, “Wavelet transform analysis of transient wave propagation in a dispersive medium,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. vol. 95, n.3, pp. 1441–1449, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.R. Selfridge, IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonic, SU-2, 381 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.A. Breazeale, J.H. Cantrell, Jr. and J. S. heyman, “Ultrasonic wave Velocity and Attenuation Measurements,” in Methods of Experimental Physiscs, ed. by P.D. Edmonds, Academic Press, New York `979, Vol. 19, pp. 67–135Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. P. Papadakis, “Ultrasonic velocity and Attenuation: Measurement Methods with Scientific and Technical Applications,” in Physical Acoustics, ed. by W.P. Mason and R.N. Thurston, Academic Press, New York, 1976, vol. XII, Chapt. 5, pp. 277–374Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.A. Viktorov, Rayleigh and Lamb Waves, pp. 142–144, Plenum Press, NY 1967Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Koabayashi, K. Kaneko and S. Tanishi, “Lamb Wave and its application to a Digitizer,” Proc. of 11th Symp. on Ultrasonic Electronics, Vol. 30, pp. 68–70, 1991Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Abbate
    • 1
  • J. Frankel
    • 1
  • P. Das
    • 2
  1. 1.Munitions, and Chemical Command Army Research, Development and Engineering Center, Benet LaboratoriesU.S. Army ArmamentWatervlietUSA
  2. 2.Electrical, Computers, and Systems Engineering Dept.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations