Advertisement

Dynamic Effects in Ultrasonic Determination of Composite Moduli Using Velocity Data

  • W. Huang
  • S. I. Rokhlin

Abstract

Ultrasonic techniques show great promise for nondestructive characterization of high temperature composites which are usually manufactured with specially designed fiber-matrix interphases. Ultrasonically measured composite elastic moduli are important mechanical characteristics, and the problem of interphase characterization is also often related to the measured composite moduli. The characterization of interphase is critical since the interphase transfers load from the fiber to the matrix and its properties significantly affects the overall mechanical performance of the composite. Chu and Rokhlin have recently developed methods to determine fiber-matrix interphase elastic properties from ultrasonically measured composite moduli using static micromechanical models [1, 2, 3, 4]. Since their method is based on measurements of ultrasonic wave velocities in different directions in the composite and on relating them to the static composite elastic moduli, error may be introduced in determining the static composite moduli from wave velocity data if dispersion is not negligible. We have performed experimental measurements and theoretical studies of dispersion and attenuation for waves propagating along and normal to fibers in a SiC/Ti unidirectional metal matrix composite [5, 6, 7]. In this paper we focus on the effect of fiber-induced dispersion on determination of the composite and fiber-matrix interphase moduli.

Keywords

Wave Velocity Fiber Direction Fiber Fraction Matrix Layer Composite Cylinder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y.C. Chu and S.I. Rokhlin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 920 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y.C. Chu, S.I. Rokhlin and G.Y. Baaklini, J. Eng. Mat. Tech. 115, 237 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.C. Chu and S.I. Rokhlin, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4121 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.C. Chu and S.I. Rokhlin, Mech. Mater, (in press, 1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Huang and S.I. Rokhlin, in Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol. 14, eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1995), 1233.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Huang and S.I. Rokhlin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. submitted.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Huang and S.I. Rokhlin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. submitted.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y.C. Chu and S.I. Rokhlin, Metall. Trans. (November, 1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Huang and S.I. Rokhlin, Mech. Mater. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Truell, C. Elbaum and B.B. Chick, Ultrasonic Methods in Solid State Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.I. Beltzer, Acoustics of Solids, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988).MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.C. Waterman and R. Truell, J. Math. Phys. 2, 512 (1961).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.M. Christensen, Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd edition, (Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL 1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.K. Mal and R.B. Yang, in Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol. 13, eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), 1453.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Hashin and B.W. Rosen, J. Appl. Mech. 31, 223 (1964).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. A. Hegemier, G.A. Gurtman and A.H. Nayfeh, Int. J. Solids Structures 9, 395 (1973).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Huang, S.I. Rokhlin and Y.J. Wang, Ultrasonics 33, November (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Huang
    • 1
  • S. I. Rokhlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Nondestructive Evaluation ProgramThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations