Advertisement

A New Ultrasonic Transducer Combining Three Modes: High Axial Resolution, High Transverse Resolution and Standard Modes

  • Daniel De Vadder
  • Alain Lhémery
  • Nicolas Gengembre

Abstract

Ultrasonic methods of nondestructive testing become more and more quantitative. They aim not only to detect but also to identify and characterize defects. This results in contradictory requirements for transducer design. One sought improvements in axial resolution for a given frequency range in reducing the pulse duration, leading to low sensitivity and failing in the case of small defects close to the transducer. Good transverse resolution with a planar transducer is obtained by using it in its pseudo-focal zone in which the ultrasonic beam is narrow, that is, at a range corresponding to the limit of the near-field, even if this range is ill-defined in the case of a broad band transducer.

Keywords

Piezoelectric Element Axial Resolution Edge Wave Ultrasonic Beam Uniform Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.P. Weight, NDT International 17, 3 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.P. Weight, UK Patent N° 8203463 (1982), U.S. patent N° 4,509,153 (1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.H. Brittain and J.P. Weight, Ultrasonics 25, 100 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.K.Hsu, F.J.Margetan, M.D. Hasselbusch, S.J. Wormley, M.S. Hughes and D.O. Thompson, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferr. Freq. Cont. 37, 404, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Hayward, R. Hamiton, B. Kanani and D. Reilly, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1808 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. D. Martin and M.A. Breazale, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 1668 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.I. Kazhis and A.I. Lukoshevichyus, Sov. Phys. Acoust. 22, 167 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Haselberg, J. Krautkrämer, Acustica 9, 359 (1959).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Newberry, M. Preischel and J. McKain, Review of Progress in QNDE 11, eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, (Plenum, New-York, 1992), 999–1004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Lhémery, D. De Vadder and N. Gengembre, Review of Progress in QNDE 15, op cit. (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel De Vadder
    • 1
  • Alain Lhémery
    • 1
  • Nicolas Gengembre
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Mécanique, École Centrale ParisURA 850 C.N.R.S.Châtenay-Malabry cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations