Overview of Magnetic Diagnostics Planned for ITER

  • L. de Kock
  • S. Ali-Arshad
  • V. Belyakov
  • S. Bender
  • A. Costley
  • O. Gruber
  • A. Kellman
  • Yu. Kutznetsov
  • J. Leuer
  • T. Matoba
  • P. McCarthy
  • V. Mukhovatov
  • D. Orlinski
  • P. Stott
  • R. Snider
  • T. Todd
  • C. Windsor
  • I. Yasin
  • K. Young

Abstract

The magnetic diagnostic for ITER has to meet the classical requirements of the magnetic diagnostic on the present day large divertor tokamaks and has in addition the requirement to work during the long pulse in excess of 1000s and in a hostile radiation environment.

Keywords

Attenuation IAEA Casing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    . Minutes of the 2nd meeting of the ITER Experts Group on Diagnostics, Naka Joint Work Site, Japan, February 1995Google Scholar
  2. Report on the IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Magnetic Measurements for Large Fusion Devices, Kharkov, Ukraine, 5–70ctober 1994. Nucl. Fusion to be published.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.L. Lao, et. al. “Reconstruction of Current Profile Parameters & Plasma Shapes in Tokamaks”, Nuclear Fusion, 25, (1985), 1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. TAC 4, ITER Documentation.Google Scholar
  5. D. Baker, L.L. Lao, E.J. Strait. “Magnetic Diagnostics for ITER”, Report GA-C21299, June 1993.Google Scholar
  6. S. Ali-Arshad, L. de Kock, Rev. of Sci. Instrum. 64 (1994) 2679 – 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. de Kock
    • 1
  • S. Ali-Arshad
    • 2
  • V. Belyakov
    • 3
  • S. Bender
    • 3
  • A. Costley
    • 1
  • O. Gruber
    • 4
  • A. Kellman
    • 5
  • Yu. Kutznetsov
    • 6
  • J. Leuer
    • 5
  • T. Matoba
    • 7
  • P. McCarthy
    • 8
  • V. Mukhovatov
    • 1
  • D. Orlinski
    • 9
  • P. Stott
    • 2
  • R. Snider
    • 5
  • T. Todd
    • 10
  • C. Windsor
    • 11
  • I. Yasin
    • 6
  • K. Young
    • 12
  1. 1.ITER Joint Central TeamUK
  2. 2.JET Joint UndertakingUK
  3. 3.Efremov InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia
  4. 4.IPP GarchingGermany
  5. 5.GASan DiegoUSA
  6. 6.IPPKharkovUkraine
  7. 7.JAERINakaJapan
  8. 8.Univ. of CorkIreland
  9. 9.Kurchatov InstituteMoscowRussia
  10. 10.AEA Culham LabUK
  11. 11.AEA Harwell LabUK
  12. 12.PPPLPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations