Collective Thomson Scattering Diagnostic of Confined Alpha Particle Distributions in ITER

  • Umberto Tartari

Abstract

The presence of diffused, strongly non-Maxwellian and possibly anisotropically-distributed heating sources, the fusion-produced alpha particles, makes the real difference between the heating phase of an ignited plasma and present-day fusion plasmas. This stresses the importance of alpha particle diagnostics for ITER. The information required will be manifold. It is unanimously recognized, however, that knowing the space and velocity distribution of the confined alphas during slow down, up to their birth velocity v∝0 = 1.3 x 107 m/s (E∝0 = 3.5MeV), will be essential. Collective Thomson scattering (CTS) has the potential to provide this piece of information. Radiation from a high-power coherent source is launched into the plasma and the Doppler-shifted radiation scattered at a given angle is collected and analyzed. Under suitable conditions, the scattering process is primarily due to the shielding electrons moving along with the ions and therefore the spectrum is strictly related to the ion velocity distributions, including the alpha’s. The schematic of a CTS diagnostic, shown in Fig. 1 with reference to a proposed experiment based on the free electron laser (FEL)1, is conceptually similar at all frequencies.

Keywords

Manifold Attenuation Coherence Refraction IAEA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Acknowledgements

  1. 1.
    R.E. Shefer et al.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 61: 3214 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Behn et al.Phys. Rev. Lett., 62: 2833 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.K. Richards et al.Appl. Phys. Lett., 62: 28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.V. Suvorov et al.IX Joint Workshop on ECE and ECRH, Borrego Springs (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.S. Machuzak et al.IV IAEA Meeting on Alpha Particle in Fusion Research, Princeton (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.A. Hoekzema et al.XXII EPS Conf. on Contr. Fusion and Plasma Phys., Bournemouth (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. SheffieldPlasma Scattering of e. m. Radiation, Academic Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Cirant, S. Nowak and A. OreficeIFP Rep. FP 94/3 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.E. Costley, J.A. Hoekzema and T.P. HughesITER Rep. IL-PH-7-0-10 (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.P. Hutchinson et al.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 56: 1075 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. BindslevPlasma Phys. and Contr. Fusion, 33: 1775 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Galbiati, M. Lontano and U. TartariPlasma Phys. and Contr. Fusion, 33: 1049 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Vahala, G. Vahala, and D. J. SigmarNucl. Fus., 28: 1595 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.H. HutchinsonJET Rep. R(87)07 (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Fidone and G. GranataPhys. Plasmas, 1: 1231 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Orsitto and U. TartariRev. Sci. Instrum., 66: 2 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. MakowskiMeeting on ITER Tasks on ECRH, Cadarache (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Lontano et al.V Joint Russian-German Meeting on ECRH and Gyrotrons, Garching (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umberto Tartari
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica del PlasmaCNR-ENEA-Euratom AssociationMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations