Modeling the Response of Vegetation Distribution and Biodiversity to Climate Change

  • Martin T. Sykes
  • Alex Haxeltine
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 152)

Abstract

The natural ecosystems of the world may be divided into a small set of biomes, each characterized by the dominance of one or more functional types of plants. At regional-to-global scales climate exerts a dominant influence over the distribution of these plant functional types (Woodward 1987). Smaller-scale variations in distribution may be controlled by smaller-scale features of the environment (e.g., soils and topography). Specific climatic controls on the distribution of these dominant plant functional types may be categorized as ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition mediated by the effects of climate. Ecophysiological constraints on individual plant functional types account for the gross qualitative features of biome distribution, and such constraints have been incorporated into a number of rule-based vegetation models (Woodward 1987); (Neilson et al. 1992); (Prentice et al. 1992).

Keywords

Biomass Vortex Migration Dioxide Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams JM, Woodward FI (1989) Patterns in tree species richness as a test of the glacial extinction hypothesis. Nature 339:699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Mufti MM, Sydes CL, Furness SB, Grime JP, Band SR (1977) A quantitative analysis of shoot phenology and dominance in herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Ecology 65:759–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlein PJ, Prentice IC, Webb T III (1986) Climatic response surfaces from pollen data for some eastern North American taxa. Journal of Biogeography 13:35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtsson L, Botzet M, Esch M (1995) Hurricane-type vortices in a general circulation model. Tellus 47A: 1751–1796.Google Scholar
  5. Bengtsson L, Botzet M, Esch M (1996) Will greenhouse gas-induced warming over the next 50 years lead to higher frequency and greater intensity of hurricanes? Tellus 48A:57–73.Google Scholar
  6. Botkin DB, Janak JF, Wallis JR (1972) Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. Journal of Ecology 60:849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bugmann HKM, Solomon AM (1995) The use of a European forest model in North America: a study of ecosystem response to climate gradients. Journal Biogeography 22:477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugmann HKM, Xiaodong Y, Sykes MT, Martin P, Linder M, Desanker P, et al. (1996) A comparison of forest gap models: model structure and behaviour. Climatic Change 34:289–313.Google Scholar
  9. Clark JS (1989) Ecological disturbance as a renewal process: theory and application to fire history. Oikos 56:17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cody ML (1975) Towards a theory of continental species diversities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp. 214–257. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI, Prentice IC, Betts RA, Broukin V, et al. (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to Co2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Global Change Biology 7:357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. American Naturalist 137:27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desanker PV, Prentice IC (1994) MIOMBO—a vegetation dynamics model for the Miombo woodlands of Zambian Africa. Forest Ecology and Management 69:87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foley JA (1994) Net primary productivity in the terrestrial biosphere: the application of a global model. Journal of Geophysical Research 99:20773–20783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foley JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Levis S, Pollard D, Sitch S, Have Hine, A (1996) An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10:603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley JA, Levis S, Prentice IC, Pollard D, Thompson SL (1998) Coupling dynamic models of climate and vegetation. Global Change Biology 4:561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison SP (1990) An Introduction to General Circulation Modelling Experiments with Raised CO 2. WP-90-27. International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  19. Hawksworth DL, Kalin-Arroyo MT (1995) Magnitude and distribution of Biodiversity. In: Heywood VH, et al. (eds) Global Biodiversity Assessment, pp. 107–173. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC (1996) BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10:693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC, Cresswell ID (1996) A coupled carbon and water flux model to predict vegetation structure. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heywood VH (ed) (1979) Flowering plants of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Hora B (ed) (1981) The Oxford Encyclopaedia of Trees of the World. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Huntley B, Berry PM, Cramer W, McDonald P (1995) Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. Journal of Biogeography 22:967–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kienast F (1987) FORECE—A Forest Succession Model for Southern central Europe. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, ORNL/TM-10575, 69 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Lantham RE, Ricklefs RE (1993) Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species Diversity: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, pp. 178–184. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Larcher W (1983) Physiological Plant Ecology. Second ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  28. Leemans R (1991) Sensitivity analysis of a general forest succession model. Ecological Modelling 53:247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leemans R, Cramer W (1991) The USAS climate database for land area on a grid of 0.5 resolution. WP-41 International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Melillo JM, Prentice IC, Schulze E-D, Farquhar GD, Sala OE (1996) Terrestrial ecosystems: biotic feedbacks to climate. In: Houghton J, et al. (eds) Climate Change: The IPCC1995 Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Dirzo R, Sala OE (1995) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: basic principles. In: Heywood VH (ed) Global Biodiversity Assessment, pp. 279–325. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Neilson RP (1995) A model for predicting continental scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecological Applications 5:362–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neilson RP, King GA, Koerper G (1992) Towards a rule-based biome model. Landscape Ecology 7:27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nix HA, Switzer MA (1991) Rainforest animals: atlas of vertebrates endemic to Australia’s wet tropics. Kopwari 1:112.Google Scholar
  36. Ojima DS, Galvin KA, Turner BL II (1994) The global impact of land-use change. Bioscience 44:300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, et al. (1993) Observations and modelling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7: 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pianka ER (1967) On lizard species diversity: North American flatland deserts. Ecology 48:333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pitelka L, the Plant Migration Workshop Group (Ash J, Berry S, Bradshaw RHW, Brubaker LB, Clark J, Davis MB, et al.) (1997) Plant migration and climate change. American Scientist 85:464–473.Google Scholar
  40. Prentice IC, Leemans R (1990) Pattern and process and the dynamics of forest structure: a simulation approach. Journal of Ecology 78:340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prentice IC, Sykes MT (1995) Vegetation geography and global carbon storage changes. In: Woodwell GM, Mackenzie FT (eds) Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climatic System: Will the Warming Speed the Warming] pp. 304–312. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Prentice IC, Sykes MT, Cramer W (1991) The possible dynamic response of northern forests to global warming. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1:129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prentice IC, Sykes MT, Cramer W (1993) A simulation model for the transient effects of climatic change on forest landscapes. Ecological Modelling 65:51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography 19:117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prentice IC, Sykes MT, Lautenschlager M, Harrison SP, Dennisenko O, Bartlein PJ (1993) Modelling global vegetation patterns and terrestrial carbon storage at the last glacial maximum. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 3:67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Price DT, Apps MJ, Kurz WA, Prentice IC, Sykes MT (1993) Simulating the carbon budget of the Canadian boreal forest using an integrated suite of process-based models. In: Chhun-Huor Ung (ed) Forest Growth Models and their Uses, pp. 251–264. Canadian Forest Service.Google Scholar
  47. Richerson PJ, Lumm K (1980) Patterns of plant species diversity in California: relation to weather and topography. American Naturalist 116:504–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenzweig ML, Abramsky Z (1993) How are diversity and productivity related? In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species Diversity: Historical and geographical perspectives, pp. 52–65. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  49. Running SW, Coughlan JC (1988) A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. I. Hydrologie balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modelling 42:125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sisk TD, Launer AE, Switky KR, Ehrlich PR (1994) Identifying extinction threats. Bioscience 44:592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sitch S (2000) The role of vegetation dynamics in the control of atmospheric Co2 content. PhD Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  52. Sykes MT (1997) The biogeographic consequences of forecast changes in the global environment: Individual species’ potential range changes. In: Huntley B, Cramer W, Morgan AV, Prentice HC, Allen JRM (eds) Past and Future Rapid Environmental Changes: The Spatial and Evolutionary Responses of Terrestrial Biota, pp. 427–440. NATO ASI series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  53. Sykes MT, Prentice IC (1995) Boreal forest futures: modelling the controls on tree species range limits and transient responses to climate change. Water, Air, Soil and Pollution 82:415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sykes MT, Prentice IC (1996) Climate change, tree species distributions and forest dynamics: a case study in the mixed conifers/northern hardwoods zone of northern Europe. Climatic Change 34:161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sykes MT, Prentice IC, Cramer W (1996) A bioclimatic model for the potential distribution of northern European tree species under present and future climates. Journal of Biogeography 23:203–233.Google Scholar
  56. Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  57. Tilman D, Pacala S (1993) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species Diversity: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, pp. 13–25. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  58. Turner JRG, Lennon JJ, Lawrenson JA (1988) British bird distributions and the energy theory. Nature 335:539–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Urban DL (1990) A Versatile Model to Simulate Forest Pattern: A Users Guide to Zelig 1.0. University of Virginia, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Charlottesville, VA. 108 pp.Google Scholar
  60. VEMAP members 1995. Vegetation/ecosystem mapping and analysis project (VEMAP): a comparison of biogeography and biogeochemistry models in the context of global change. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watt AS (1947) Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology 35:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woodward FI (1987) Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  63. Woodward FI, Rochefort L (1991) Sensitivity analysis of vegetation diversity to environmental change. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1:7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Woodward FL, Smith TM (1994) Global photosynthesis and stomatal conductance: Modelling the controls by soil and climate. Botanical Research 20:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woodward FL, Smith TM, Emanuel WR (1995) A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wright DH, Currie DJ, Maurer BA (1993) Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species Diversity: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, pp. 66–74. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin T. Sykes
  • Alex Haxeltine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations