A Fluid-Structure Interaction Model of Ciliary Beating

  • Robert H. Dillon
  • Lisa J. Fauci
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 124)

Abstract

The coupled system of a viscous, incompressible fluid and a single, force-generating organism is difficult to analyze, even when the kinetics of an organism’s waveform is taken as given. In the past decades, the efforts to describe quantitatively the fluid dynamics of spermatozoa and ciliary propulsion have been very successful. Since the Reynolds number is quite small and inertial effects can be neglected, the linear Stokes flow assumption has been used to investigate the hydrodynamic consequences of flagellar undulations [3]. These investigations have been both analytical and computational. Resistive-force theory, initially developed by Gray and Hancock [12], makes use of the linear Stokes flow assumption, and constructs the flow field by means of distributions of fundamental singularities. Lighthill later improved this theory by incorporating slender body approximations [19], since the diameter of a flagellum is much smaller than its length. More detailed hydrodynamic analysis, such as refined slender body theory and boundary element methods, have produced excellent simulations of both two- and three-dimensional flagellar propulsion in an infinite fluid domain or in a domain with a fixed wall [17], [18], [16], [22]. In addition, ciliary motion, where the effect of a single plane surface at the base of the cilia is included, is studied by Gueron and Liron [14], [15], wherein they also present a thorough survey of flagellar hydrodynamics.

Keywords

Ghost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K.M. Arthurs, L.C. Moore, C.S. Peskin, E.B. Pitman, and H.E. Layton. Modeling arteriolar flow and mass transport using the immersed boundary method. J. Comp. Phys., 147:402–440, 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D.C. Bottino. Modeling viscoelastic networks and cell deformation in the context of the immersed boundary method. J. Comp. Phys, 147:86–113, 1998.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Brennen and H. Winet. Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 9:339–398, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A.J. Chorin. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput., 22:745–762, 1968.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Dillon and L.J. Fauci. An integrative model of internal axoneme mechanics and external fluid dynamics in ciliary beating, in preparation, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Dillon, L.J. Fauci, A. Fogelson, and D.P. Gaver. Modeling biofilm processes using the immersed boundary method. J. Comp. Phys, 129:57–73, 1996.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.H. Dillon and L.J. Fauci. Coupling the internal axoneme mechanics of cilia and flagella with external fluid dynamics. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Cilia, Mucus, and Mucociliary Interactions, New York, 1997. Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cd. Eggleton and A.S. Popel. Large deformation of red blood cell ghosts in a simple shear flow. Phys. Fluids, 10:1834–1845, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.J. Fauci and A.L. Fogelson. Truncated Newton methods and the modeling of complex immersed elastic structures. Comm. on Pure and Appl. Math., 46:787–818, 1993.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L.J. Fauci and A. Mcdonald. Sperm motility in the presence of boundaries. Bull. Math. Biol., 57(5):679–699, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.L. Fogelson. Continuum models of platelet aggregation: Formulation and mechanical properties. SIAM J. Appl. Math, 52:1089–1110, 1992.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Gray and G. Hancock. The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J. Exp. Biol, 32:802–814, 1955.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Gueron, K. Levi-Gurevich, N. Liron, and J.J. Blum. Cilia internal mechanism and metachronal coordination as the result of hydrodynamic coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:6001–6006, 1997.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Gueron and N. Liron. Ciliary motion modeling, and dynamic multicilia interactions. Biophys. J., 63:1045–1058, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Gueron and N. Liron. Simulations of three-dimensional ciliary beats and cilia interactions. Biophys. J., 65:499–507, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J.J.L. Higdon. The generation of feeding currents by flagellar motion. J. Fluid Mech., 94:305–330, 1979.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J.J.L. Higdon. A hydrodynamic analysis of flagellar propulsion. J. Fluid Mech., 90:685–711, 1979.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.J.L. Higdon. The hydrodynamics analysis of flagellar propulsion: helical waves. J. Fluid Mech., 94:331–351, 1979.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J.L. Lighthill. Flagellar hydrodynamics. SIAM Review, 18:161–230, 1976.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Murase. The Dynamics of Cellular Motility. John Wiley, Chichester, 1992.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    C.S. Peskin. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J. Comp. Phys., 25:220–252, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    N. Phan-Thien, T. Tran-Cong, and M. Ramia. A boundary-element analysis of flagellar propulsion. J. Fluid Mech., 184:533–549, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G.B. Witman. Introduction to cilia and flagella. In R.A. Bloodgood, editor, Ciliary and Flagellar Membranes, pp. 1–30, New York, 1990. Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Dillon
    • 1
  • Lisa J. Fauci
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pure and Applied MathematicsWashington State UniversityPullman
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsTulane UniversityNew Orleans

Personalised recommendations