Skip to main content

India’s “Project Tiger” Reserves: The Interplay Between Ecological Knowledge and the Human Dimensions of Policymaking for Protected Habitats

  • Chapter
Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management

Abstract

This chapter poses a challenge to the utility and value of the Ecological Society of America’s guidelines for land use and management (Dale et al., Chapter 1) by conducting a hypothetical, post hoc analysis of India’s utilization of the inviolate “national park” model as a tool for saving the Bengal tiger. Both the utility and value of the ESA’s guidelines are affirmed, but not without revision. For protected area/species preservation efforts to work, the principles guiding planning decisions must be informed not only by ecological science, but at all points, by the social, cultural, and political environment of the human communities directly impacted by those decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, D., and R. Guha. 1995. Nature, culture, imperialism: essays on the environmental history of South Asia. Oxford University Press, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, A. 1993. Corbett wildlife, villagers fight over habitat. The Pioneer, New Delhi 4 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badshah, M.A., and C.A.R. Bhadran. 1962. National Parks: their principles and purposes. Pages 24–33 in A. Adams, editor. Proceedings of the First World Conference on National Parks. National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourliere, F. 1962. Science and parks in the Tropics. Pages 64–68 in A. Adams, editor. Proceedings of the First World Conference on National Parks. National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior. Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S. 1995. Nature keepers: the new science of nature management. Free Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani, S.N. 1994. Wildlife management. Rawat Publications, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and R. Guha. 1992. This fissured land: an ecological history of India. Oxford University Press, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, K. 1983. The relationship between adjacent lands and protected areas: issues of concern for the protected area manager. In J.A. McNeely and K.R. Miller, editors. National parks, conservation, and development: the role of protected areas in sustaining society. Proceedings of the World Congress on National Parks 11–22 October 1982. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. 1996. Recommendations of the committee appointed by the Honorable High Court of Delhi on wildlife preservation, protection and laws.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. 1989. The unquiet woods: ecological change and peasant resistance in the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, Delhi, India. India

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of (GOI). n.d. Draft scheme for conducting census of tigers in India. Doc. No. F.25/90/70/FD.

    Google Scholar 

  • India, Government of (GOI). 1972. Wild life (protection) bill, 1972. Bill No. 78, 17 August 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • India, Government of (GOI). 1990. Project Tiger 1990. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • India, Government of (GOI). 1993. A review of Project Tiger. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • India, Government of (GOI). 1996. Recommendations of the Committee Appointed by the Honorable High Court of Delhi on Wildlife Preservation, Protection and Laws. New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Board for Wildlife-Expert Committee (IBWL). 1970. Wildlife conservation in India: report of the Expert Committee. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Board for Wildlife-Task Force (IBWL). 1972. Project Tiger: a planning proposal for preservation of tiger (Panthera Tigris tigris). Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature. 1970. IUCN Supplementary Paper No. 27. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature. 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. 1998. Safety from man-eaters. Christian Science Monitor 90(62): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, A., and R. Tandon. 1993. Doon declaration on people and parks. Pages 35–36 in Report on National Workshop on declining access to and control over natural resources in national parks and sanctuaries. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A., P. Pande, S. Singh, and D. Variava. 1989. Management of national parks and sanctuaries in India: a status report. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A., N. Singh, and S. Suri. 1996. People and protected areas: towards participatory conservation in India. Sage Publications, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal, P.C., and A.S. Parihar. n.d. Management plan of Kanha National Park and Project Tiger Kanha for period 1989–1990 to 1998–1999. Officer of the Conservator and Field Director, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumat, R.S. 1992. Enquiry into missing tigers. Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, E.M. 1974. What is wrong with the national park movement? Pages 32–38 inSir Hugh Elliott, Bt. editor. Second World Conference on National Parks. IUCN, Morges, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panjwani, R. 1994. “Evolution of wildlife laws in India.” In The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (as amended up to 1991). Natraj Publishers, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, J.J. 1976. India struggles to save her wildlife. Pages 299–343 in National Geographic, September 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, S. 1967. Wild life management trends in India. Government of India Press, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbentrop, B. 1900. Forestry in British India. Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N.C. 1995. Forests, people & profit: new equations for sustainability. Natraj Publishers, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G.B. 1967. The deer and the tiger: a study of wildlife in India. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidensticker, J., S. Christie, and P. Jackson, editors. 1999. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. 1988. Corbett National Park. In Indian wildlife: Sri Lanka, Nepal. S. Israel and T. Sinclair, editors. APA Publications, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stracey, P.D. 1960. Wild life management in India. Leaflet No. 3 issued by the Indian Board for Wildlife, Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Government of India Press, New Delhi, India (reprinted in 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger Link. 1999. Cattle compensation. Page 23 in TigerLink News 5(3) December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R.L. and U.S. Seal. 1987. Tigers of the world: the biology, biopolitics, management, and conservation of an endangered species. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuren, J. 1962. Science and nature reserves. Pages 270–276 in A. Adams, editor. Proceedings of the First World Conference on National Parks. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G.C. 1992. India’s wildlife dilemma. National Geographic 181(5):2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, C. 1962. National parks. Pages 13–21 in A. Adams, editor. Proceedings of the First World Conference on National Parks. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wide Fund for Nature-India. 1996. The tiger call. Dhriti Printers, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI, IUCN, and UNEP (World Resources Institute, the World Conservation Union, and the United Nations Environment Programme). 1992. Global biodiversity strategy: guidelines for action to save, study, and use earth’s biotic wealth sustainability and equitably. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Botteron, C.A. (2001). India’s “Project Tiger” Reserves: The Interplay Between Ecological Knowledge and the Human Dimensions of Policymaking for Protected Habitats. In: Dale, V.H., Haeuber, R.A. (eds) Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0099-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0099-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95100-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0099-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics