Abstract
Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century mathematicians were not the first to struggle with the interpretation of exactness of geometrical constructions; also in the classical Greek period there existed a rich variety of constructional procedures and many opinions on their acceptability. It appears that these opinions never converged to a clear communis opinio. This lack of uniformity and the relative scarcity of sources meant that sixteenth-century mathematicians had no clear classical examples in developing their ideas about the exactness of geometrical constructions. Therefore, it is not necessary to survey the classical ideas on the legitimacy of constructions here; rather I can restrict myself to dealing with those few classical sources that actually influenced the early modern debates. Besides, and fortunately, I can refer to an excellent recent study on the classical tradition of geometrical problem solving, Wilbur Knorrās The ancient tradition of geometric problems.1
Knorr 1986
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bos, H.J.M. (2001). The legitimation of geometrical procedures before 1590. In: Redefining Geometrical Exactness. Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0087-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0087-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6521-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0087-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive