Abstract
The cancer community is no stranger to informatics or data standards. Indeed, within health care, tumor registries and clinical treatment protocols heralded a rigor of data representation and structure that the rest of health care took decades to match. However, once underway, the larger arena of healthcare standards embraced the principles of inter-operability and data sharing at a scale that the early cancer templates, codes, and profiles were not designed to address. The universe of cancer information remains very large, however, and the utility of parochial standards persists. The question is how might the domain specific data standard needs of the cancer community be leveraged by the existing and emerging health information standards that surround it? Furthermore, because the domain of cancer is among the most striking multi-system and multi-organ disciplines in clinical medicine, what advantages might ensue from adoption of larger spectrum health information standards? Few of these questions will be answered in this introductory chapter; suffice that they be raised, cast into historical perspective, and followed by an authoritative suite of chapters that provide depth and insight on the relationship between cancer informatics and the larger world of health information standards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (ACS). 1951. Manual of Tumor Nomenclature and Coding (MONTAC). New York: American Cancer Society.
American College of Surgeons (ACS). 1999. Commission on Cancer. Standards of the Commission on Cancer. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons. 1997. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual/American Joint Committee on Cancer, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Chute CG. 2000. And Data for All: The NCI Initiative on Clinical Infrastructure Standards. MD Computing 17(2): 19–21.
Codman EA, Mayo WJ, et al. 1914. Report of the Committee Appointed by the Clinical Congress of Surgeons of North America: Standardization of Hospitals. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 18(Suppl.):9–12.
Gehan EA, Schneiderman MA. 1990. Historical and Methodological Developments in Clinical Trials at the National Cancer Institute. Statistics in Medicine. 9(8): 871–880; discussion 903–906.
Gospodarowicz M, Benedet L, Hutter RV, Fleming I, Henson DE, Sobin LH. 1998. History and International Developments in Cancer Staging. Cancer Prevention & Control 2(6):262–268.
Mayo CH. 1925. Address of the President. Delivered at Convocation of American College of Surgeons, New York, October 24, 1924. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics(3):447–448.
Mayo CH. 1905. Mortality, Disability, and Permancy of Cure in Surgery. Northwestern Lancet 25:179–182.
Mayo WH. 1921. Mortality and End-Results in Surgery. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 32:97–102.
United States Census Office. 1889. 11th Census, 1890. Report of a Commission Appointed by the Honorable Superintendent of Census. Washington, DC: Judd & Detweiler.
World Health Organization. 2000. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chute, C.G. (2002). Cancer Data, Information Standards, and Convergent Efforts. In: Silva, J.S., et al. Cancer Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0063-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0063-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6547-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0063-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive