Using Claims Data to Contain Health Care Costs

  • Richard H. Egdahl
  • Diana Chapman Walsh
Part of the Industry and Health Care book series (SSIND, volume 6)


The costs of an employee health benefit are like an iceberg: administrative service costs are the tip above the water, and paid claims the far more critical bulk hidden below the surface. In recent years, benefits managers have begun to reorient their attention from the administrative costs to the less obvious but much larger cost-saving potential represented in incurred claims. This shift is occurring because of the variable but shrinking and inevitably limited amounts of money remaining to be saved in the realm of administration of the benefit package, as discussed above, and because there are legions of recognized experts on whom a firm can call for advice—carriers, brokers, fee-paid consultants, third-party administrators, and other kinds of advisers.27 Most large corporations now have in-house managers with the expertise needed to protect the corporation’s interests and weigh the relative merits and risks of alternative funding arrangements. Having made such an assessment, implementation is relatively straightforward; it is a matter of locating the carrier or administrator offering the best package and entering into a contract. The effector arms are easy to identify.


Health Care Cost Claim Data Cost Containment Insurance Industry Utilization Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Executive Office of the President, Council on Wage and Price Stability, The Complex Puzzle of Rising Health Care Costs: Can the Private Sector Fit it Together? (Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O. no. 053-003-00255-8, December 1976), hereafter cited as COWPS.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    COWPS, pp. 131, 135.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    COWPS, p. 155.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    COWPS, p. 112.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    COWPS, p. 132.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Employee Benefit Plan Review Research Reports is a comprehensive looseleaf service covering pensions and profit sharing; health, life, and disability benefits; unions, and ERISA. Included in the health, life, and disability volumes are several sections relevant to the general considerations of funding and administrative alternatives, data and their uses. The service is available through Charles D. Spencer and Associates, Inc., 222 West Adams Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Since it is updated frequently, references to it run the risk of obsolescence but the interested reader can find current information on self-insurance of health benefits in section 331.5 of the Reports.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruce Spencer, Group Benefits in a Changing Society (Chicago, Ill.: Charles D. Spencer and Associates, Inc., 1978), hereafter cited as Spencer, Group Benefits.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Employee Benefit Plan Review, published monthly by Charles D. Spencer and Associates, Inc., 222 West Adams Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606, hereafter cited as EBPR.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Business Insurance, “the national news magazine of loss prevention, risk financing, and employee benefit management,” published biweekly by Crain Communications, Inc., 740 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    David A. Weeks, ed., Rethinking Employee Benefits Assumptions (New York: The Conference Board, 1978); Seymour Lusterman, ed., Health-Care Issues for Industry (New York: The Conference Board, 1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See, for example, O. D. Dickerson, Health Insurance (Homewood, Ill.; Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1968), John Krizay and Andrew Wilson, The Patient as Consumer: Health Care Financing in the United States (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1974), Avedis Donabedian, Benefits in Medical Care Programs (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Source Book of Health Insurance Data 1977–78 (Washington, D.C.: Health Insurance Institute, 1978). The institute is located at 1850 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diana Chapman Walsh and Richard H. Egdahl, Payer, Provider, Consumer: Industry Confronts Health Care Costs, Springer Series on Industry and Health Care, no. 1 (New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 1977), p. 91.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    EBPR Research Reports, p. 331.5.–1, 9–72 Rev.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    For a concise description of the uses and limitations of a 501(c)(9) trust, see Spencer, Group Benefits, pp. 300–301.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spencer, Group Benefits, pp. 285–286.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michael B. Jones, Partner, New York Office, Hewitt Associates, presentation at Cornell University Health Program for Business Executives, “Strategies for Controlling Medical Care Costs,” Ithaca, New York, May 5, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spencer, Group Benefits, p. 287.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ibid., p. 295.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    COWPS, p. 24.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spencer, Group Benefits, p. 285.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibid., p. 286.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    EBPR Research Reports, 331.5.–7, 7–71.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spencer, Group Benefits, p. 302.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., p. 301.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    For a special report on agents and brokers of commercial insurance, including a directory, see Business Insurance’s annual agent/broker profiles issue, August 7, 1978.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    “Borden Saves 14.2% in 1977 Because of Strict Coordination of Benefits Policy,” EBPR Research Reports 331.3.–7, 4–78.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Payer, Provider, Consumer, pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Washington Business Group on Health, “A Private Sector Perspective on the Problems of Health Care Costs,” a working paper prepared for the Honorable Joseph Califano, Secretary, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C, April 1977, p. 10.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., p. 16.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Edmund Faltmayer, “Where Doctors Scramble for Patients’ Dollars,” Fortune (November 6, 1978), pp. 114–120.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richard H. Egdahl and Diana Chapman Walsh, eds., Industry and HMOs: A Natural Alliance, Springer Series on Industry and Health Care, no. 5 (New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 1978).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Labor-Management Group Position Papers on Health Care Costs 1978 (a limited number of copies is available at cost from the Washington Business Group on Health, 605 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    David A. Weeks, National Health Insurance and Benefit Plans (New York: The Conference Board, 1974), p. 36.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    See, for example, Institute of Medicine, Assessing Quality in Health Care: An Evaluation (Washington, D.C: IOM Publication 76-04, November 1976).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Payer, Provider, Consumer, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    James E. Post, Risk and Response: Management and Social Change in the American Insurance Industry (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1976), p. 103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Egdahl
    • 1
  • Diana Chapman Walsh
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Industry and Health CareBoston University Health Policy InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations