Advertisement

Occupational Health Hazards: Management and Labor in a Vital Interaction

  • Richard H. Egdahl
  • Diana Chapman Walsh
Part of the Springer Series on Industry and Health Care book series (SSIND, volume 4)

Abstract

Occupational health hazards pose a separate set of problems from those related to finding a health care provider or selecting a system of care. At the ends of the spectrum, occupational health hazards are either acute and obvious, demanding nothing short of immediate and intense effort to remove them from the workplace, or entirely unsuspected, leaving little to be done. Between the two extremes lies a large and growing grey area that challenges traditional assumptions about roles and responsibilities in the interactions between management and labor. The wide middle of the spectrum is the focus of this chapter; the ambiguity of the risks makes effective communication vital—and difficult. Together with pressures created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHAct) of 1970 and with scientific findings at the tip of a possibly massive iceberg, the social movements toward self-determination discussed in the previous three chapters are accelerating demands within industry for better communication about occupational health hazards.

Keywords

Occupational Health Occupational Physician Occupational Accident Vinyl Bromide Occupational Health Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Nicholas A. Ashford, Crisis in the Workplace (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1976), p. 73.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Committee on Public Information in the Prevention of Occupational Cancer, “Informing Workers and Employers about Occupational Cancer” (Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1977), pp. 23–24 (hereafter PIPOC Report).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jean Seligmann, “Industrial Sterility,” Newsweek (August 29, 1977): 69.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Report of the HEW Secretary’s Commission on Pesticides and Their Relationship to Environmental Health (1969), p. 568.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    “Guidelines on Pregnancy and Work,” and “Comprehensive Bibliography on Pregnancy and Work,” (Chicago, Ill.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leon J. Warshaw, “The Pregnant Worker,” Journal of Occupational Medicine (in press).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    James C. Hyatt, “Early Warning: Protection for Unborn? Work Safety Issue Isn’t As Simple as it Sounds,” Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, August 16, 1977, p. 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Preventive Medicine USA: Task Force Reports Sponsored by the John E. Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, and the American College of Preventive Medicine (New York: Prodist, 1976), pp. 540–552.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    William W. Lowrance, Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety (Los Altos, Calif.: William Kaufmann, Inc., 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panel on Chemicals and Health of the President’s Science Advisory Committee, Chemicals and Health (Washington, D.C.: Science and Technology Policy Office, National Science Foundation, September 1973), p. 131.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., p. 11.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 409 (c) (3) (A), and 512 (d) (1) (H).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    President’s Advisory Committee, Chemicals and Health, p. 131.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., p. 29.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Preventive Medicine USA, p. 544.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    John T. Talty, “Carcinogens in Industry,” Letter to the Editor, Science, 198 (October 28, 1977): 354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomas H. Maugh II, “Carcinogens in the Workplace: Where to Start Cleaning Up,” Science 197 (September 23, 1977): 1268–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    “The Right to Know: Practical Problems and Policy Issues Arising from Exposures to Hazardous Chemical and Physical Agents in the Workplace,” Policy paper prepared by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Rockville, Md.: Center for Disease Control, July 1977).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Committee on Public Information in the Prevention of Occupational Cancer, National Academy of Sciences, “Public Information in the Prevention of Occupational Cancer: Proceedings of a Symposium,” December 2–3, 1976 (Springfield, Va.: National Technical Information Service, April 1977), (hereafter PIPOC Proceedings).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ibid., p. 147–176.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., p. 147.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OSHA Hearings, April 1977, p. 66.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., p. 146.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    “Health Records Face a Privacy Challenge,” Business Week (October 31,1977): 38.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Privacy Protection Study Commission, Personal Privacy in an Information Society (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office [stock no. 052-003-00395-3,], July 1977).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    “Health Records and Privacy: What Would Hippocrates Say?” Science, 198 (October 28, 1977): 382.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alan F. Westin, Computers, Health Records, and Citizen Rights (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office [stock no. 003-003-0168-1], 1976), p. 1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    “Health Records and Privacy: What Would Hippocrates Say?” Science, 198 (October 28, 1977): 382.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    William E. Morton, “The Responsibility to Report Occupational Health Risks,” Journal of Occupational Medicine, 19 (April 1977): 258–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Albert L. Nichols and Richard Zeckhauser, “Government Comes to the Workplace: An Assessment of OSHA,” The Public Interest, 49 (February 1977): 39–69.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    David Burnham, “Agency Plan to Identify and Control Toxic Chemicals Arouses a Dispute,” New York Times (March 5, 1978), p. 1, 46.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., p. 46.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Margot Hornblower, “Placing Dollar-and-Cent Value on Life,” Washington Post (November 7, 1976) p. 1.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    OSHA Hearings, April 1977, p. 49.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Ibid., p. 53.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    “Asbestos Firms Seek Way Out of Lawsuits,” Boston Globe (October 1977), p. 12.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    U.S. Congress, House, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Environmental Causes of Cancer: Hearings, 94th Cong., 2d. sess., May 28 and September 20, 1976, p. 2.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barry Commoner, “The Promise and Perils of Petrochemicals,” New York Times Magazine (September 25, 1977): 38.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ibid., p. 73.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robert Stewart Smith, The Occupational Safety and Health Act: Its Goals and Its Achievements (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Egdahl
    • 1
  • Diana Chapman Walsh
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Industry and Health CareBoston University Health Policy InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations