Advertisement

Empirical Analysis of Concurrent Classical-Operant Schedules

  • Wendon W. Henton

Abstract

The following series of experiments is loosely based upon the competing response interpretation of conditioned suppression by Brady and Hunt (1955). This type of analysis also seems to account for the effects of conditioned stimuli paired with food as well as shock, and the interpretation has been slightly extended to a more general analysis of concurrent schedules controlling concurrent responses (Henton and Brady, 1970). The present studies were conducted between 1970 and 1973 as a developing experimental analysis of the response patterns within all classical-operant schedule combinations. The experiments were consequently designed to purposely manipulate and directly record the response interactions generated by the various possible classicaloperant combinations.

Keywords

Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Conditioned Suppression Operant Response Strip Chart Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annau, Z., and Kamin, L. J.: The conditioned emotional response as a function of the intensity of the US. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 54, 428–432, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anohkin, P. K.: The role of the orienting-exploratory reflex in the formation of the conditioned reflex. In, L. G. Voronin, A. N. Leontiev, A. R. Luria, E. N. Sokolov, and O. S. Vinogradova (eds.): Orienting Reflex and Exploratory Behavior. Moscow, Academy of Pedagogical Science, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. Azrin, N. H., and Hake, D. F.: Positive conditioned suppression: conditioned suppression using positive reinforcers as the unconditioned stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 12, 167–173, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boakes, R. A., Halliday, M. S., and Poli, M.: Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 23, 177–191, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady, J. V.: Does tetraethylammonium reduce fear. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 46, 307–310, 1953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, J. V.: Emotion revisited. J. Psychiatr. Res., 8, 363–384, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, J. V.: Toward a behavioral biology of emotion. In, L. Levi (ed.): Emotions—Their Parameters and Measurement. New York, Raven Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Brady, J. V., and Hunt, H. F.: An experimental approach to the analysis of emotional behavior. J. Psychol., 40, 313–325, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brady, J. V., Kelly, D. D., and Plumlee, L.: Autonomic and behavioral responses of the rhesus monkey to emotional conditioning. Annu. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 159, 959–971, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady, J. V., Henton, W. W., and Ehle, A.: Some effects of emotional conditioning upon autonomic and electromyographic activity. Paper read at the Eastern Psychological Association, 1970. (Also described in Brady, 1971.)Google Scholar
  11. Brown, P. L., and Jenkins, H. M.: Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 11, 1–8, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brownstein, A. J., and Hughes, R. G.: The role of response suppression in behavioral contrast: signalled reinforcement. Psychonomic Sci., 18, 50–52, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Brownstein, A. J., and Newsom, C.: Behavioral contrast in multiple schedules with equal reinforcement rates. Psychonomic Sci., 18, 25–26, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Bull, J. A., and Overmeir, J. B.: Incompatibility of appetitive and aversive conditioned motivation. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, vol. 4 (part 1), 1969, pp. 97–98.Google Scholar
  15. Catania, A. C.: Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6, 253–263, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Catania, A. C.: Concurrent operants. In, W. K. Honig (ed.): Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
  17. Catania, A. C.: Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 12, 731–734, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Church, R. M.: Response suppression. In, B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church (eds.): Punishment and Aversive Behavior. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, H.: Conditioned suppression. a survey of the literature. Psychonomic Monogr. [Suppl.], 2, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, H., and Kreuter, C.: Conditioned suppression of an avoidance response by a stimulus paired with food. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 17, 277–285, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desiderato, O., and Newman, A.: Conditioned suppression produced in rats by tones paired with escapable or inescapable shock. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 77, 427–431, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dinsmoor, J. A.: Punishment: I. The avoidance hypothesis. Psychol. Rev., 61, 34–46, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunham, P. J.: Punishment: method and theory. Psychol. Rev., 78, 58–70, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunham, P. J.: Some effects of punishment upon unpunished responding. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 17, 443–450, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estes, W. K.: Outline of a theory of punishment. In, B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church (eds.): Punishment and Aversive Behavior. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  26. Estes, W. K., and Skinner, B. F.: Some quantatative properties of anxiety. J. Exp. Psychol., 29, 390–400, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falk, J. L.: Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science, 133, 195–196, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferster, C. B., and Skinner, B. F.: Schedules of Reinforcement, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glickman, S. E., and Schiff, B. B.: A biological theory of reinforcement. Psychol. Rev., 74, 81–109, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottwald, P.: The role of punishment in the development of conditioned suppression. Physiol. Behav., 2, 283–286, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grossen, N. E., Kostansek, D. J., and Bolles, R. C.: Effects of appetitive discriminative stimuli on avoidance behavior. J. Exp. Psychol., 81, 340–343, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hake, D. F., and Powell, J.: Positive reinforcement and suppression from the same occurrence of the unconditioned stimulus in a positive conditioned suppression procedure. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 14, 247–257, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hearst, E., and Jenkins, H. M.: Sign Tracking: The Stimulus-Reinforcer Relation and Directed Action. Monograph of the Psychonomic Society, Austin, Texas, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. Henton, W. W.: The effects of pre-schedule change stimuli upon avoidance behavior. Rep. Neuro-physiol. Inst. (Kbh.) 34–35, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. Henton, W. W.: Avoidance response rates during a pre-food stimulus in monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 17, 269–275, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henton, W. W., and Brady, J. V.: Operant acceleration during a pre-reward stimulus. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 13, 205–211, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henton, W. W., and Iversen, I. H.: Concurrent response rates during pre-event stimuli. Paper presented at the Easter Conference, Cambridge, March 1973, Abstract pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  38. Henton, W. W., and Jordan, J. J.: Differential conditioned suppression during pre-shock stimuli as a function of shock intensity. Psychol. Record, 20, 9–16, 1970.Google Scholar
  39. Herrnstein, R. J., and Morse, W. H.: Some effects of response independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 50, 461–467, 1957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffman, H. S., and Barrett, J.: Overt activity during conditioned suppression: a search for punishment artifacts. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 16, 343–348, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoffman, H. S., and Fleshier, M.: The course of emotionality in the development of avoidance. J. Exp. Psychol., 64, 288–294, 1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huston, J. P., and Brozek, G.: Attempt to classically condition eating and drinking elicited by hypothalamic stimulation in rats. Physiol. Behav., 8, 973–977, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iversen, I. H.: Behavioral interactions in concurrent reinforcement schedules. Paper presented at the English Experimental Analysis of Behavior Group, Bangor, 1974.Google Scholar
  44. Iversen, I. H.: Concurrent responses during multiple schedules in rats. Scand. J. Psychol., 16, 49–54, 1975a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iversen, I. H.: Interactions between lever pressing and collateral drinking during VI with limited hold. Psychol. Record, 25, 47–50, 1975b.Google Scholar
  46. Iversen, I. H.: Reciprocal response interactions in concurrent variable-interval and discrete-trial fixed-ratio schedules. Scand. J. Psychol., 16, 280–284, 1975c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Iversen, I. H.: Interactions between reinforced responses and collateral responses. Psychol. Record, 26, 399–413, 1976.Google Scholar
  48. Kamin, L. J.: Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In, W. F. Pro-kasy (ed.): Classical Conditioning. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
  49. Karpicke, J., Christoph, G., Petersen, G., and Hearst, E.: Signal location and positive vs negative conditioned suppression in the rat. J. Exp. Psychol. [Anim. Behav. Processes], 3, 105–118, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaufman, A.: Response suppression in the CER paradigm with extinction as the aversive event. Psychonomic Sci., 15, 15–17, 1969.Google Scholar
  51. Kelleher, R. T., and Gollub, L. R.: A review of positive conditioned reinforcers. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5, 543–595, 1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kimble, G. A.: Hilgard and Marquis’ Conditioning and Learning. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.Google Scholar
  53. Kimmel, H. D.: Instrumental inhibitory factors in classical conditioning. In, W. F. Prokasy (ed.): Classical Conditioning: A Symposium. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
  54. Knitisch, W., and White, R. S.: Concurrent conditioning of bar press and salivation responses. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 55, 863–968, 1962.Google Scholar
  55. Konorski, J.: Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  56. Leitenberg, H.: Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9, 205–212, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leitenberg, H., Bertsch, G. J., and Coughlin, R. C.: “Timeout from positive reinforcement” as the UCS in a CER paradigm with rats. Psychonomic Sci., 13, 3–4, 1968.Google Scholar
  58. Lo Lordo, V. M.: Facilitation of food-reinforced responding by a signal for response-independent food. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 15, 49–55, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lo Lordo, V. M., McMillan, J. C., and Riley, A. L.: The effects of food-reinforced pecking and treadle-pressing of auditory and visual signals for response-independent food. Learning Motivation, 5, 24–41, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Longo, N., Milstein, S., and Bitterman, M.: Classical conditioning in the pigeon: effects of partial reinforcement. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 55, 983–986, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lyon, D. O.: Conditioned suppression: operant variables and aversive control. Psychol. Record, 18, 317–338, 1968.Google Scholar
  62. Maier, S. F., Seligman, M. E. P., and Solomon, R. I.: Pavlovian fear conditioning and learned helplessness: effects on escape and avoidance behavior of (a) the CS-US contingency and (b) the independence of the US and voluntary responding. In, B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church (eds.): Punishment and Aversive Behavior. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  63. Meltzer, D., and Brahlek, J. A.: Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 13, 67–75, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miczek, K.: Effects of scopolamine, amphetamine, and benzodiazepines on conditioned suppression. Pharmac., Biochem., Behav., 1, 401–411, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mogenson, G. J., and Stevenson, J. A. F.: Drinking and self-stimulation with electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus. Physiol. Behav., 1, 251–254, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Orme-Johnson, D. W., and Yarczower, M.: Conditioned suppression, punishment, and aversion. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 21, 57–74, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patton, R. L., and Rudy, J. W.: Orienting during classical conditioning: acquired vs. unconditioned responding. Psychonomic Sci., 7, 27–28, 1967.Google Scholar
  68. Pavlov, I. P.: Conditioned Reflexes. London, Oxford Press, 1927.Google Scholar
  69. Pliskoff, S.: Rate change effects during a pre-schedule change stimulus. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 4, 383–386, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pliskoff, S.: Rate-change effects with equal potential reinforcements during the “warning” stimulus. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6, 557–562, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pliskoff, S. S., Hawkins, T. D., and Wright, J. E.: Some observations on the discriminative stimulus hypothesis and rewarding electrical stimulation of the brain. Psychol. Record, 14, 179–184, 1964.Google Scholar
  72. Pomerleau, O. F.: The effects of stimuli followed by response-independent shock on shock-avoidance behavior. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 14, 11–21, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Premack, D.: Reinforcement theory. In, D. Levine (ed.): Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  74. Premack, D.: Catching up on common sense, or two sides of a generalization: reinforcement and punishment. In, R. Glazer (ed.): On the Nature of Reinforcement. New York, Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  75. Rachlin, H.: On the tautology of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 15, 249–251, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rachlin, H., and Baum, W. M.: Response rate as a function of the amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 12, 11–16, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Razran, G.: The observable unconscious and the inferable conscious in current Soviet psychophys-iology: Intereoceptive conditioning, semantic conditioning, and the orienting reflex. Psychol. Rev., 68,81–147, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rescorla, R. A., and Solomon, R. L.: Two-process learning theory: relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and and instrumental learning. Psychol. Rev., 74, 151–184, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roberts, A. E., Cooper, K. G., and Richey, T. L.: Rat behaviors during unsignalled avoidance and conditioned suppression training. Bull. Psychonomic Soc., 9, 373–376, 1977.Google Scholar
  80. Schaeffer, R. W.: The reinforcement relation as a function of instrumental response base rate. J. Exp. Psychol., 69, 419–425, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaeffer, R. W., and Premack, D.: Licking rates in infant albino rats. Science, 134, 1980–1981, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schwartz, B., and Gamzu, E.: Pavlovian control of operant behavior. In, W. K. Honig and J. E. R. Staddon (eds.): Handbook of Operant Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  83. Sidman, M.: By-products of aversive control. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1, 265–280, 1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sidman, M.: Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology. New York, Basic Books, 1960.Google Scholar
  85. Sidman, M., Herrnstein, R. J., and Conrad, D. G.: Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shock. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 50, 553–557, 1957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Skinner, B. F.: “Superstition” in the pigeon. J. Exp. Psychol., 38, 168–172, 1948.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Skinner, B. F.: Are theories of learning necessary. Psychol. Rev., 57, 193–216, 1950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith, J. C.: Conditioned suppression as an animal psychophysical technique. In W. Stebbins (ed.): Animal Psychophysics. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
  89. Solomon, R. L., and Turner, L. H.: Discriminative classical conditioning in dogs paralyzed by curare can later control discriminative avoidance responses in the normal state. Psychol. Rev., 69, 202–219, 1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stein, L., Sidman, M., and Brady, J. V.: Some effects of two temporal variables on conditioned suppression. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1, 153–162, 1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stein, N., Hoffman, H. S., and Stitt, C.: Collateral behavior of the pigeon during conditioned suppression of key pecking. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 15, 83–93, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Terrace, H.: Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 6, 1–27, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Valenstein, E. S., and Cox, V. C.: Influence of hunger, thirst, and previous experience in the test chamber on stimulus bound eating and drinking. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 70, 189–199, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Van Dyne, G.: Conditioned suppression with a positive US in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 77, 131–135, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weiskrantz, L.: Emotion. In, L. Weiskrantz (ed.): Analysis of Behavioral Change. New York, Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar
  96. Zener, K.: The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response. Am. J. Psychol., 50, 384–403, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendon W. Henton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations