Advertisement

Water Regimes of Soils and Vegetation

  • Hans Jenny
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 37)

Abstract

Growth of land plants is sustained by the water supply in the soil. How the soil receptacle is filled up and how it is drained by roots are questions of fateful concern to agriculture and forestry. Unlike the water in ponds and lakes, stored soil water is “hanging water.”

Keywords

Soil Water Water Potential Field Capacity Water Regime Gravitational Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arkley, R. J. 1963. Hilgardia 34: 559–584.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arkley, R. J., and R. Ulrich. 1962. Hilgardia 32: 443–462.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babcock, K. L. 1963. Hilgardia 34: 417–542.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodman, G. B., and N. E. Edlefsen. 1934. Soil Sci. 38: 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs, L. J., and H. L. Shantz. 1912. Bot. Gaz. 53: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Day, P. R. 1942. Soil Sci. 54: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeBano, L. F., and J. Letey (Eds.). 1968. Water repellent soils. Proc. Symp. Univ. Calif. Riverside.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delamare Deboutteville, C. 1951. Microfaune du sol des pays tempérés et tropicaux. Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner, W. R. 1960. Soil Sci. 89: 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gradmann, H. 1928. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 69: 1–100.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackson, R. D. 1973. In Field Soil Water Regime, R. R. Bruce, ed., pp. 37-50. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Sp. Publ. 5, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer, P. J. 1969. Plant and Soil Water Relationships. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lemon, E. R., D. W. Stewart, R. W. Shawcroft, and S. E. Jensen. 1973. In Field Soil Water Regime, R. R. Bruce, ed., pp. 57–67. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Sp. Publ. 5, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magnuson, M. D. 1968. Evapotranspiration. In Proc. of West. Reg. Techn. Work-Planning Conf. Coop Soil Survey (mimegr.). Univ. of Calif., Riverside.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McColl, J. G. 1977. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41: 984–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, D. R. (Ed.). 1972. Soil Water. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Penman, H. L. 1948. Roy. Soc. London Proc. A 193: 120–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richards, L. A. 1941. Soil Sci. 51: 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richards, L. A. 1949. Soil Sci. 68: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richards, L. A. (Ed.). 1952. Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S.D.A. Agr. Handbook No. 60.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rode, A. A. 1955. The Moisture Properties of Soils and Underground Strata (in Russian). Transi. Israeli Progr. Sci. Trans., Jerusalem, 1960.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scholander, P. F., H. T. Hammel, E. D. Bradstreet, and E. A. Hemmingsen. 1965. Science 148: 339–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schubert, J. 1930. Das Verhalten des Bodens gegen Wärme. In Handbuch d. Bodenlehre, E. Blanck, ed., Vol. 6, pp. 342–375. Julius Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slatyer, R. O. (Ed.). 1973. Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, G. D., F. Newhall, L. H. Robinson, and D. Swanson. 1964. Soil-Temperature Regimes: Their Characteristics and Predictability. U.S.D.A. SCS-TP-144.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Staff (Soil Survey). 1975. Soil Taxonomy. U.S.D.A., S.C.S. Agr. Handb. 436.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor, G. S., E. Stibbe, T. J. Thiel, and J. H. Jones. 1970. Hydraulic Conductivity Profiles of Toledo and Miami Soils as Measured by Field Monoliths. Ohio Agr. Res. and Dev. Center, Research Bull. 1025.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taylor, S. A., and G. L. Ashcroft. 1972. Physical Edaphology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. Geogr. Rev. 38: 55–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    United States Dept. Agr., S.C.S. 1960. Palmer-Havens Diagram for Computing Potential Evapotranspiration by the Thornthwaite Method. Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    van den Honert, T. H. 1948. Disc. Faraday Soc. 3: 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Viets, F.G. 1964. Plant Food Rev. 10: No. 2: 2–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Jenny
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil Biology, College of Natural ResourcesUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations