Advertisement

The Penetration of Cuticle by Insecticides

  • C. T. Lewis
Part of the Springer Series in Experimental Entomology book series (SSEXP)

Abstract

The epicuticle that invests the skeletal cuticle has evolved as the final barrier between insect tissues and the outside world. It is well known that this layered structure of lipids and protein, a micron or two thick, restricts the transpiration of water and thus prevents desiccation of the tissues. But how does it behave toward external substances? In terrestrial insects, the epicuticular surface resists wetting by external water, a property which has a survival value for small insects that might otherwise be trapped by wet surfaces. On the other hand, the surface is readily wetted by many organic liquids. Nonpolar substances are not a normal hazard in the natural world, and the hydrophobic epicuticle is not well adapted to resist their spread and penetration to the inner layers of the cuticle and the epidermal cells. The study of factors governing the penetration of foreign molecules across the insect cuticle is, however, of more than academic interest. Most investigations in this field have been related, directly or indirectly, to the chemical control of species harmful to man and his interests.

Keywords

Contact Angle Spray Droplet Micrometer Screw Desert Locust Insect Cuticle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam G, Delbruck M (1968) Reduction of dimensionality in biological diffusion processes. In: Rich A, Davidson N (eds) Structural chemistry and molecular biology. Freeman, San Francisco Calif.Google Scholar
  2. Alexandrov VY (1935) Permeability of the chitin in some dipterous larvae and the method of its study. Acta Zool 16:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold AJ (1965) A high speed automatic microsyringe. J Sci Instr 42:350–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold AJ (1967) A hand operated microapplicator to deliver drops of five sizes. Lab Pract 16:56–57.Google Scholar
  5. Baker JRJ, Appleton TC (1976) A technique for electron microscope au-toradiography (and X-ray microanalyses) for diffusible substances using freeze-dried frozen sections. J Microsc 108:307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow F, Hadaway AB (1974) Some aspects of the use of solvents in ULV formulations. Monogr Br Crop Prot Counc No. 11:84–93.Google Scholar
  7. Beament JWL (1945a) The cuticular lipoids of insects. J Exp Biol 21:115–131.Google Scholar
  8. Beament JWL (1945b) An apparatus to measure contact angles. Trans Faraday Soc 3:97.Google Scholar
  9. Beament JWL (1958) Effect of temperature on the waterproofing mechanism of an insect. J Exp Biol 35:494–579.Google Scholar
  10. Benezet HJ, Forgash AJ (1972) Penetration and distribution of topically applied Malathion in the housefly. J Econ Entomol 65:53–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackett NM, Parry DM (1977) A simplified method of “hypothetical grain” analysis of electron microscope autoradiographs. J Histochem Cytochem 25:206–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brezner J (1959) An electrically operated microdispenser. J Econ Entomol 52:1019–1020.Google Scholar
  13. Brück E, Kommick H (1971) Histochemister Nachweis der Penetrationswege von Salzlösungen durch die isolierte Insektencuticula. J Insect Physiol 17:2027–2034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buerger AA (1966) A model for the penetration of integuments by non-electrolytes. J Theoret Biol 11:131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buerger AA (1967) A theory of integumental penetration. J Theoret Biol 14:66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buerger AA, O’Brien RD (1965) Penetration of non-electrolytes through animal integuments. J Cell Comp Physiol 66:227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burt PE Lord KA Forrest JM Goodchild RE (1971): The spread of topically-applied Pyrethrin I from the cuticle to the central nervous system of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Entomol exp Appl 14:255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Busvine JR (1962) A laboratory technique for measuring the susceptibility of flies to insecticides. Lab Pract 11:88–92.Google Scholar
  19. Butler CG, Callow RK, Greenway AR, Simpson J (1974) Movement of the pheromone, 9-oxodec-2-enoic acid, applied to the body surfaces of honeybees. Entomol Exp Appl 17:112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caro LG (1964) High-resolution autoradiography. In: Prescott DM (ed) Methods of cell physiology. Vol 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Chapman-Andresen C (1953) Thin films for application between emulsion and specimen in autoradiography. Cr Trav Lab Carlsberg (Ser Chim) 28:529–540.Google Scholar
  22. Conner WE, Wilkinson CF, Morse RA (1978) Penetration of insecticides through the foregut of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Pestic Biochem Physiol 9:131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crank J (1976) Diffusion mathematics in Medicine and Biology and its applications. Bull Inst Math 12:106–112.Google Scholar
  24. Crisp DJ, Thorpe WH (1948) The water protecting properties of insect hairs. Disc Faraday Soc 3:210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ebeling W (1974) Permeability of insect cuticle. In: Rockstein M (ed) Physiology of the Insecta, Vol VI, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Ehn E, Larsson B (1979) Poperties of an antiscratch-layer-free X-ray film for the autoradiographic registration of tritium. Science Tools 26:24–29.Google Scholar
  27. Elliot M, Ford MG, Janes NF (1970) Insecticidal activity of the pyrethrins and related compounds, III. Penetration of pyrethroid insecticides into mustard beetles. Pestic Sci 1:220–223.Google Scholar
  28. Fan HY, Cheng TH, Richards AG (1948) The temperature coeficients of DDT action on insects. Physiol Zool 21:48–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher RW (1952) The importance of the locus of application on the effectiveness of DDT for the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Can J Zool 30:254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gerolt P (1969) Mode of entry of contact insecticides. J. Insect Physiol 15:563–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerolt P (1970) The mode of entry of contact insecticides. Pestic Sci 1:209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gwiazda M, Lord KA (1967) Factors affecting the toxicity of Diazinon to Musca domestica L. Ann Appl Biol 59:221–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hadaway AB, Barlow E, Flower LS (1976) Penetration of insecticides from solutions into tsetse flies and other insects. Centre for Overseas Pest Control Misc Rep 22:1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Hamilton EW, Dahm PA (1960) A versatile automatic micro applicator. J Econ Entomol 53:853.Google Scholar
  35. Hansbury R (1943) Publ Am Assoc Adv Sci 20:85. Quoted in Busvine JR (1971) A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, London.Google Scholar
  36. Harrison RH (1961) Topical application of insecticide solutions to mites and small insects. N Z J Sci 4:534–539.Google Scholar
  37. Hewlett PS (1958) Interpretation of dosage-mortality data for DDT-resistant houseflies. Ann Appl Biol 46:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hewlett PS, Lloyd CJ (1959) Topical application of mobile liquids by means of microcapillary tubes. Ann Appl Biol 48:125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holdgate MW (1955):The wetting of insect cuticles by water. J exp. Biol 32:591–617.Google Scholar
  40. Hoskins WM (1932) Toxicity and permeability. 1. The toxicity of acid and basic solutions of sodium arsenite to mosquito pupae. J Econ Enomol 25:1212–1224.Google Scholar
  41. Hoyle G (1955) The effects of some common cations in neuromuscular transmission in insects. J Physiol 127:90–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones GD Glynne, Lowe HJ (1956) A micro syringe adaptor for repetitive applications. Lab Pract 5:69–72.Google Scholar
  43. Kerr RW (1954) A method for the topical application of small measured doses of insecticidal solutions to individual insects. Bull Entomol Res 45:317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurihara N, Uchida M, Fujita T, Nakajima M (1974) Studies on BHC isomers and related compounds VI. Penetration and translocation of BHC isomers in the cockroach and their correlation with physicochemical properties. Pestic Biochem Physiol 4:12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis CT (1962) Diffusion of oil films over insects Nature (London) 193:904.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis CT (1963) Some applications of radioisotopes to the study of contamination of insects by insecticide solutions. Proc Ser Int. Atomic Energy Agency 74:135–146.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis CT (1965) Influence of cuticle structure and hypodermal cells on DDT absorption by Phormia terraenovae R-D. J Insect Physiol 11:683–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Locke M (1961) Pore canals and related structures in insect cuticle. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 10:589–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Locke M (1964) The structure and formation of the integument in insects. Rockstein M (ed) Physiology of Insecta,Vol 3, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Lord KA (1948) The sorption of DDT and its analogues by chitin. Biochem J 43:72–78.Google Scholar
  51. Matsumura F (1963) The permeability of the cuticle of Periplaneta americana (L) to Malathion. J Insect Physiol 9:207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller TA (1979) Insect neurophysiological techniques, Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moriarty F, French MC (1971) The uptake of dieldrin from the cuticular surface of Periplaneta americana L. Pestic Biochem Physiol 1:286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Brien RD (1957) Esterases in the semi-intact cockroach. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:223–229.Google Scholar
  55. Olson WP (1970) Penetration of 14C-DDT into and through the cockroach integument. Comp Biochem Physiol 35:273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olson WP, O’Brien RD (1963) The relation between physical properties and penetration of solutes into the cockroach cuticle. J Insect Physiol 9:786–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Phillips JE, Dockrill A A (1968) Molecular sieving of hydrophilic molecules by the rectal intima of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J Exp Biol 48:521–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Quraishi MS, Poonawaller ZT (1969) Radioautographic study of the diffusion of topically applied DDT —C14 into internal organs. J Econ Entomol 62:988–993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Renkin EM (1954) Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes. J Gen Physiol 38:225–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards AG (1962) Penetration of insect cuticle. In: Shepard HH (ed) Methods of testing chemicals on insects. Burgress, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  61. Richards AG, Cutkomp LK (1946) Correlation between the possession of a chi-tinous cuticle and sensitivity to DDT. Biol Bull 90:97–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richards AG, Fan NY (1949) Studies of arthropod cuticle V. The variability in the permeability of larval cuticles of the blowfly. J Cell Comp Physiol 33:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Richardson CH, Shepherd HN (1930) The effect of hydrogen-ion-concentration on the toxicity of nicotine, pyridine and methylpyrrolidine to mosquito larvae. J Agric Res 41:337–348.Google Scholar
  64. Ricks M, Hoskins WM (1948) Toxicity and permeability 2. The entrance of arsenic into larvae of the flesh fly Sarcophaga securifera. Physiol Zool 21:258–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Scheie PO Smyth T Jr (1967) Electrical measurements on cuticles excised from adult male Periplaneta americana (L.). Comp Biochem Physiol 21:547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Seveus L (1978) Preparation of biological material for X-ray microanalysis of diffusible substances. J Microsc 112:269–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Slifer EH (1950) Vulnerable areas on the surface of the tarsus and pretarsus of the grasshopper (Achdidae, Orthoptera); with special reference to the arolium. Ann Entomol Soc Am 43:173–188.Google Scholar
  68. Slifer EH (1954) The permeability of the sensory pegs on the antennae of the grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Biol Bull 106:122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stumpf WE, Roth LJ (1969) Autoradiography using dry mounted freeze-dried sections. In: Autoradiography of diffusible substances Roth LJ, Stumpf WE (eds) Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Treherne JE (1957) The diffusion of non-electrolytes through the isolated cuticle of Schistocerca gregaria. J Insect Physiol 1:178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trevan JW (1922) An apparatus for the measurement of small quantities of fluid. Lancet 202:786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walton WH, Prewett WC (1949) The production of sprays and mists of uniform size by means of spinning disc type sprayers. Proc Phys Soc London B 62:341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Webb JE, Green RA (1945) On the penetration of insecticides through the insect cuticle. J Exp Biol 22:8–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Welling W (1977) Dynamic aspects of insect-insecticide interactions. Ann Rev Entomol 22:53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wichard W, Komnick H (1971) Electron microscopical and histochemical evidence of chloride cells in tracheal gills of mayfly larvae. Cytobiologie Z Exp Zellforsch 3:215–228.Google Scholar
  76. Wigglesworth VB (1933) The physiology of the cuticle and of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus with special reference to the function of the oenocytes and of the dermal glands. Q J Microsc Sci 76:269–318.Google Scholar
  77. Wigglesworth VB (1942) Some notes on the integument of insects in relation to the entry of contact insecticides. Bull Entomol Res 33:205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams R (1977) The advancing front of a spreading liquid. Nature 266:153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Winteringham FPW (1969) Mechanism of selective insecticidal action. Ann Rev Entomol 14:409–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. T. Lewis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations