Skip to main content

Management of the Contaminated Operation

  • Chapter
Operative Strategy in General Surgery
  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

The incidence of postoperative wound sepsis varies with the magnitude of contamination. The generally accepted classification of operative wounds according to contamination, as listed by Altemeier et al., is:

  1. 1) Clean
    • Nontraumatic

    • No inflammation encountered

    • No break in technique

    • Respiratory, alimentary, genitourinary tracts not entered

  2. 2) Clean-Contaminated
    • Gastrointestinal or respiratory tracts entered without significant spillage

    • Appendectomy—not perforated—no cloudy peritoneal exudate

    • Prepared oropharynx entered

    • Genitourity or biliary tract entered in absence of infected urine or bile

    • Minor break in technique

  3. 3) Contaminated
    • Major break in technique, or gross spillage from gastrointestinal tract

    • Traumatic wound, fresh

    • Entrance of genitourinary or biliary tracts in presence of infected urine or bile

  4. 4) Dirty and Infected
    • Acute bacterial inflammation encountered, without pus

    • Transection of “clean” tissue for the purpose of surgical access to a collection of pus

    • Perforated viscus encountered

    • Dirty traumic wound

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander J W et al. (1976) Prevention of wound infections: a case for closed suction drainage to remove wound fluids deficient in opsonic properties. Am J Surg 132: 59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amer Coll of Surg Subcommittee, Altemeier WA et al. (1976) Manual on control of infection in surgical patients. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JS et al. (1977) Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations. Ann Surg 186: 251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cruse PJ, Foord R (1973) A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 107: 206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIlrath DC et al. (1976) Closure of abdominal incisions with subcutaneous catheters. Surgery 80: 411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noon GP et al. (1967) Clinical evaluation of peritoneal irrigation with antibiotic solution. Surgery 62: 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk HC Jr, Lopez-Mayor JF (1967) Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention. Surgery 66: 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab PM, Kelly KA (1974) Primary closure of the perineal wound after proctectomy. Mayo Clin Proc 49: 176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sindelar WF, Mason GR (1979) Irrigation of subcutaneous tissue with povidonedine solution for prevention of surgical wound infections. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chassin, J.L. (1980). Management of the Contaminated Operation. In: Operative Strategy in General Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6042-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6042-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6044-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-6042-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics