Skip to main content

Validating the Utility of Abstraction Techniques

  • Chapter
Alphard: Form and Content

Abstract

A number of recent research efforts have been based on the hypothesis that encapsulation techniques, formal specification, and verification lead to significant improvements in program quality. As we gain experience with the language facilities produced by this research, we should attempt to validate that hypothesis. This paper poses this validation as the next major task in this area and outlines some ways to address it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Allen L. Ambler, Donald I. Good, James C. Browne, Wilhelm F. Burger, Richard M. Cohen, Charles G. Hoch, and Robert E. Wells, “Gypsy: A Language for Specification and Implementation of Verifiable Programs”, SIGPLAN Notices, 12,3 (March 1977), pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.E. Boebert, J.M. Kamrad, and E.R. Rang, “Analytic Validation of Flight Software”, Honeywell Systems and Research Center Report, 775RCG3, September 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Per Brinch Hansen, The Architecture of Concurrent Programs, Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles M. Geschke, James H. Morris Jr., and Edwin H. Satterthwaite, “Early Experience with Mesa”, Communications of the ACM, 20, 8 (August 1978), pp. 540–553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donald I. Good, “Constructing Verified and Reliable Communications Processing Systems” Software Engineering Notes, 2, 5 (October 1977), pp. 8–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. John V. Guttag, Ellis Horowitz, and David R. Musser, “Abstract Data Types and Software Validation”, USC Information Sciences Institute Technical Report ISI/RR-76-48, August 1976. Also Communications of the ACM, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John V. Guttag, Ellis Horowitz, and David R. Musser, “The Design of Data Type Specifications”, in Current Trends in Programming Methodology (R.T. Yeh, ed ), Prentice-Hall, 1978 (pp. 60–79 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Hilfinger, Gary Feldman, Robert Fitzgerald, Izumi Kimura, Ralph L. London, KVS Prasad, VR Prasad, Jonathan Rosenberg, Mary Shaw, Wm. A. Wulf (editor), “(Preliminary) An Informal Definition of Alphard”, Carnegie-Mellon University Technical Report CMU-CS-78-105, February 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.A.R. Hoare, “Proof of Correctness of Data Representations”, Acta Informatica, 1, 4, 1972 (pp. 271–281 ).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gary R. Horn, “Specifications for a Secure Computer Communications Network”, Master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, October 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B.W. Kernighan and P.J. Plauger, Software Tools, Addison-Wesley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.W. Lampson, J.J. Horning, R.L. London, J.G. Mitchell, and G.J. Popek, “Report on the Programming Language Euclid”, SIGPLAN Notices, 12, 2 (February 1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbara Liskov, Alan Snyder, Russell Atkinson, and Craig Schaffert, “Abstraction Mechanisms in CLU”, Communications of the ACM, 20, 8 (August 1978), pp. 564–576.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Liskov, E. Moss, C. Schaffert, R. Scheifler, and A. Snyder, “The CLU Reference Manual”, Computation Structures Group Memo No. 161, Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ralph L. London, Mary Shaw, and Wm. A. Wulf, “Abstraction and Verification in Alphard: A Symbol Table Example”, Constructing Quality Software, P.G. Hibbard and S.A. Schuman (eds.), North-Holland, 1978 (pp. 319–351 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mark S. Moriconi, “A System for Incrementally Designing and Verifying Programs”, Volumes 1 and 2, USC Information Sciences Institute Technical Reports ISI/RR-77-65 and 66, November 1977. Also Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peter G. Neumann, Robert S. Boyer, Richard J. Feiertag, Karl N. Levitt, and Lawrence Robinson, “A Provably Secure Operating System: The System, its Applications, and Proofs”, SRI International Project 4332 Final Report, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Roubine and L. Robinson, “Special (SPECIfication and Assertion Language): Reference Manual”, SRI International Memo, August 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mary Shaw, Wm. A. Wulf, and Ralph L. London, “Abstraction and Verification in Alphard: Defining and Specifying Iteration and Generators”, Communications of the ACM, 20,8 (August, 1977 ), pp. 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Staunstrup, “Specification, Verification, and Implementation of Concurrent Programs”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Defense Requirements for High Order Computer Programming Languages, “Steelman”, June 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert E. Wells, “The Specification and Implementation of a Verifiable Communication System”, Master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, December 1976. Also Technical Report ICSCA-CMP-4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Niklaus Wirth, “Modula: A Language for Modular Programming”, Software — Practice and Experience, 7,1 (January 1977), pp.3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wm. A. Wulf, Ralph L. London, and Mary Shaw, “An Introduction to the Construction and Verification of Alphard Programs”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-2, 4 (December 1976), pp. 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaw, M. et al. (1981). Validating the Utility of Abstraction Techniques. In: Shaw, M. (eds) Alphard: Form and Content. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5979-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5979-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90663-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5979-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics