The Seven Ages of Woman: A View From American Magazine Advertisements

  • Jean Umiker-Sebeok
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

More than 20 years have passed since Roland Barthes first argued that advertisements should be studied as forms of mythical discourse. He noted that like all myths, advertisements, profoundly political yet, it seems, intentionally “depoliti-cized,” take the sign vehicles of everyday life, such as gestures, clothing, facial expressions, utterances, postures, objects, and settings, and quietly replace the simple validity of these fragments of openly conventional semiotic systems with a pseudotruth that predisposes the viewer/reader to accept bits of cultural ideology—concepts of motherhood, love, marriage, sex, family, age, social class, and the like—as immutable aspects of the real world (Barthes, 1973). Advertisements, as myths, “naturalize” symbols by removing from them all historical context, thus making these arbitrary signs appear to be eternal essences rather than constructed social devices, or artifacts. In so doing, they “sell” the prevailing ideology of the dominant segments of American society.

Keywords

Entropy Furnace Foam Income Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthes, R. Mythologies London: Paladin, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. Image-Music-Text London: Fontana, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J. Ways of seeing New York: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Courtney, A. E., & Lockeretz, S.W. A woman’s place: An analysis of the roles portrayed by women in magazine advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 1971, 8, 92–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Ethology. The biology of behavior New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Flick, M. Political socialisation: The social functions of sex roles in advertisements Working Papers, Sex Roles in Advertisements, No. 2. Bergen: Centre for Mass Communications Research, Institute of Sociology, University of Bergen, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Flick, M. Mass media research and its implications for Norwegian policy formation Working Papers, Sex Roles in Advertisements, No. 7. Bergen: Centre for Mass Communications Research, Institute of Sociology, University of Bergen, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Flick, M. & Lied, J. Selling soap or statesmen Working Papers, Sex Roles in Advertisements, No. 9. Bergen: Centre for Mass Communications Research, Institute of Sociology, University of Bergen, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. Gender advertisements Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Guthrie, R. D. Body hot spots. The anatomy of human social organs and behavior New York: Van Nostrand Rheinhold, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Henley, N. M. Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. Henley, N. M. Gender hype (Review of Goffman, 1979). Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1980, 3, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerl, G., Meier, J., Richter, J., Schönemann, A., & Welzien, L. Visuell Gesturale Kommunikation in der Anzeigenwerbung Nürnberg: Reihe “Aspekte Ästhetischer Erziehung,” 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Key, W. B. Subliminal seduction Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Key, W.B. Media sexploitation Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. LaFrance, M. & Mayo, C. Moving bodies. Nonverbal communication in social relationships Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1978.Google Scholar
  17. McCullough, D. L. The meaning and significance of advertising’s portrayal of kinship Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kansas, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Umiker-Sebeok

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations