Advertisement

Nonverbal Behavior: Barrier or Agent for Sex Role Change?

  • Clara Mayo
  • Nancy M. Henley
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

In the study of human behavior, we commonly deal with factors of fairly narrow scope and limited effects. This is not the case with research on gender and nonverbal behavior. Sex as signaled by cues of appearance is a powerful force in human interaction; “sex” is highly visible and often the first aspect of another to which we respond. It appears to have great stability, in the sense that biological characteristics and major life events are keyed to one’s (perceived) sex. Yet it appears also to be amenable to changes personal, developmental, and sociocultural. At the personal level, individuals make choices to heighten or lower the display of their gender. Developmentally, the clarity or specificity of gender display follows a course that some see as curvilinear, with a peak of sexual differentiation in the early adult years (Birdwhistell, 1970). Socioculturally, what it means to be, or be seen as, male or female has varied considerably across time and place.

Keywords

Nonverbal Behavior Nonverbal Communication Power Differential Visual Dominance Expressive Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. Studies in expressive movement. New York: Macmillan, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birdwhistell, R. L. Masculinity and femininity as display. In Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. Ekman, P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. K. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 19). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, J. Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, J. Gender, gender roles and nonverbal behavior. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge: Oelsgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Hartley, R. E. Sex-role pressures and the socialization of the male child. Psychological Reports, 1959, 5, 457–458, 461.Google Scholar
  9. Henley, N. M. Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Knapp, M. Nonverbal communication in human interaction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. LaFrance, M., & Mayo, C. Moving bodies: Nonverbal communication in social relationships. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Mayo, C., & LaFrance, M. On the acquisition of nonverbal communication: A review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1978, 24, 213–228.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. M. Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge: Oelsgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Weitz, S. Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weitzman, L. J. Sex role socialization. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clara Mayo
  • Nancy M. Henley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations