The Plectomycete Centrum

  • D. Malloch
Part of the Springer Series in Microbiology book series (SSMIC)

Abstract

Over the last 75 years, studies on ascocarp development have played an increasingly important role in ascomycete taxonomy. The classic studies by Dangeard (1907), Nannfeldt (1932), Luttrell (1951, 1954), and several others are so well known and so fundamental that they are often quoted without literature citations. Although these studies have contributed greatly to an understanding of relationships among certain groups of ascomycetes, the plectomycetes or cleistothecial forms have remained relatively unstudied. The reasons for this neglect are several but stem mainly from traditional taxonomic concepts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, S.I., 1964. Classification of coprophilous ascomycetes. The genus Sporormia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, C.A., 1928. The development of the perithecia and spermogonium of Sporomia leporina Niessl. Amer. J. Bot. 15: 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, B.T.P., 1903. The morphology and development of the ascocarp in Monascus. Ann. Bot. 17: 167–236.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, M.E., 1956. The development of the ascocarp in Phaeotrichum hystricinum. Can. J. Bot. 34: 563–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatus, R., 1938. Entwicklungsgeschichte und zytologische Untersuchungen der Ascomyceten. Perisporium funiculatum. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 87: 301–323.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, C.R., 1955. Ascocarps of Aspergillis and Penicillium. Mycologia 47: 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bessey, E.A., 1935. A Text-Book of Mycology. Blakiston’s, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchard, R.O., 1972. Origin and development of ascogenous hyphae and pseudopa-raphyses in Sporormia australis. Can. J. Bot. 50: 1725–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boedijn, K.B., 1935. On the morphology and cytology of Trichocoma paradoxa. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg 44: 243–266.Google Scholar
  10. Borzi, A., 1885. Inzengaea, ein neuer Askomycet. Jahb. Wiss. Bot. 16: 450–463.Google Scholar
  11. Boudier, E., 1904. Sur un nouveau genre et une nouvelle espece de Myriangiacees, le Guillermondia saccoboloides. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 20: 19–22.Google Scholar
  12. Boylan, B.V., 1970. The cytology and development of Preussia flanaganii sp. nov. Can. J. Bot. 48: 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brefeld, O., 1874. Botanische Untersuchungen über Schimmelpilze. II. Die Entwicklungsgeschichte von Penicillium. Felix Verlag, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  14. Cain, R.F., 1956a. Studies of soil fungi. Saturnomyces, a new genus of the Aspergillaceae. Can. J. Bot. 34: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cain, R.F., 1956b. Studies of coprophilous ascomycetes. II. Phaeotrichum, a new cleis-tocarpous genus in a new family, and its relationships. Can. J. Bot. 34: 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cain, R.F., 1956c. Studies of coprophilous ascomycetes. IV. Tripterospora, a new cleis-tocarpous genus in a new family. Can. J. Bot. 34: 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cain, R.F., 1959. The Plectascales and Perisporiales in relation to the evolution of the ascomycetes. In: Ninth International Bot. Congr. Abstracts, Vol. 2, p. 56.Google Scholar
  18. Cain, R.F., 1961a. Studies of soil fungi. III. New species of Coniochaeta, Chaetomidium, and Thielavia. Can. J. Bot. 39: 1231–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cain, R.F., 1961b. Studies of coprophilous ascomycetes. VII. Preussia. Can. J. Bot. 39: 1633–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cain, R.F., 1961c. Anixiella and Diplogelasinospora, two genera with cleistothecia and pitted ascospores. Can. J. Bot. 39: 1667–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cain, R.F., 1972. Evolution of the fungi. Mycologia 64: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cavaliere, A.R., 1966. Marine ascomycetes: Ascocarp morphology and its application to taxonomy. I. Amylocarpus, Ceriosporella gen. nov., Lindra. Nova Hedw. 10: 387–398.Google Scholar
  23. Chadefaud, M., A. Parguey-Leduc, and M. Boudin, 1966. Sur les périthèces et les asques du Preussia. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 82: 93–122.Google Scholar
  24. Chesters, C.G.C., 1935. Studies on British pyrenomycetes. I. The life histories of three species of Cephalotheca. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 19: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cookson, I., 1928. The structure and development of the perithecium in Melanospora zamiae. Ann. Bot. 42: 255–269.Google Scholar
  26. Corlett, M., 1966. Developmental studies in the Microascaceae. Can. J. Bot. 44: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crooks, K.M., 1935. An account of the cultural and cytological characteristics of a new species of Mycogala. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria New Ser. 47: 352–364.Google Scholar
  28. Dale, E., 1909. On the morphology and cytology of Aspergillus repens de Bary. Ann. Mycol. 7: 215–225.Google Scholar
  29. Dangeard, P.A., 1907. L’origine du périthèce chez les ascomycetes. Le Botaniste 10: 1–385.Google Scholar
  30. De Bary, A., 1854. Ueber die Entwicklung und den Zusammenhang von Aspergillus glaucus und Eurotium. Bot. Z. 12: 425–471.Google Scholar
  31. Dodge, B.O., 1933. The perithecium and ascus of Penicillium. Mycologia 25: 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doguet, G., 1955. Le genre Melanospora: Biologie, morphologie, développement, systématique. Le Botaniste 39: 1–313.Google Scholar
  33. Doguet, G., 1956. Le genre Thielavia Zopf. Rev. Mycol. 21, Suppl. v. 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
  34. Domaradsky, M., 1908. Zur Fruchtkörperentwicklung von Aspergillus fischeri Wehmer. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 26: 14–16.Google Scholar
  35. Emmons, C.W., 1930. Coniothyrium terricola proves to be a species of Thielavia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 57: 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Emmons, C.W., 1932. The development of the ascocarp in two species of Thielavia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 59: 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Emmons, C.W., 1935. The ascocarps in species of Penicillium. Mycologia 27: 128–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Emmons, C.W., and B.O. Dodge, 1931. The ascosporic stage of species of Scopulariopsis. Mycologia 23: 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fischer, E., 1890. Beiträge zur Kenntnis exotischen Pilze, Trichocoma paradoxa Jungh. Hedwigia 29: 161–171.Google Scholar
  40. Fraser, H.C.I., and H.S. Chambers, 1907. The morphology of Aspergillus herbariorum. Ann. Mycol. 5: 419–431.Google Scholar
  41. Fraser, L., 1953. A new genus of the Plectascales. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 78: 241–246.Google Scholar
  42. Gaumann, E., 1964. Die Pilze. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
  43. Ghatak, P.N., 1936. On the development of the perithecium of Microeurotim albidum. Ann. Bot. 50: 849–861.Google Scholar
  44. Gusseva, K., 1925. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Cephalotheca polyporicola Jaczevski. J. Soc. Bot. Russ. 10: 229–238.Google Scholar
  45. Huang, L.H., 1976. Developmental morphology of Triangularia backusii (Sordariaceae). Can. J. Bot. 54: 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kowalski, D.T., 1964. The development and cytology of Pycnidiophora dispersa. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 1076–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kowalski, D.T., 1965a. Development and cytology of Preussia typharum. Bot. Gaz. 126: 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kowalski, D.T., 1965b. The development and cytology of Melanospora tiffanii. Mycologia 57: 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kowalski, D.T., 1966. The morphology and cytology of Preussia funiculata. Amer. J. Bot. 54: 1036–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kowalski, D.T., 1968. Morphology and cytology of Preussia isomera. Bot. Gaz. 129: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuyper, H.P., 1905. Die Perithecien-Entwicklung von Monascus purpureus Went und Monascus parkeri Dangeard und die systematische Stellung dieser Pilze. Ann. Mycol. 3: 32–71.Google Scholar
  52. Lindau, G., 1899. Ueber Entwicklung und Ernährung von Amylocarpus encephaloides Currey. Hedwigia 38: 1–19.Google Scholar
  53. Luttrell, E.S., 1951. Taxonomy of the pyrenomycetes. Univ. Missouri Studies, No. 24, 1–120.Google Scholar
  54. Luttrell, E.S., 1955. The ascostromatic ascomycetes. Mycologia 47: 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maciejowska, Z., and E.B. Williams, 1963. Studies on a multiloculate species of Preussia. Mycologia 55: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malloch, D., 1970a. New concepts in the Microascaceae illustrated by two new species. Mycologia 62: 727–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Malloch, D., 1970b. The genera of cleistothecial Ascomycota. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  58. Malloch, D., and G.L. Benny, 1973. California ascomycetes: four new species and a new record. Mycologia 65: 648–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1970a. The genus Arachnomyces. Can. J. Bot. 48: 839–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1970b. Five new genera in the new family Pseudeurotiaceae. Can. J. Bot. 48: 1815–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1971a. New genera of Onygenaceae. Can. J. Bot. 49: 839–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1971b. Four new genera of cleistothecial ascomycetes with hyaline ascospores. Can. J. Bot. 49: 847–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1971c. The genus Kernia. Can. J. Bot. 49: 855–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1971d. New cleistothecial Sordariaceae and a new family Coniochaetaceae. Can. J. Bot. 49: 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1972a. New species and combinations of cleistothecial ascomycetes. Can. J. Bot. 50: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1972b. The Trichocomataceae: Ascomycetes with Aspergillus, Paecilomyces and Penicillium imperfect states. Can. J. Bot. 50: 2613–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1973a. The Trichocomaceae (ascomycetes): Synonyms in recent publications. Can. J. Bot. 51: 1647–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1973b. The genus Thielavia. Mycologia 65: 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Malloch, D., and C.T. Rogerson, 1977. Pulveria, a new genus of Xylariaceae (ascomycetes). Can. J. Bot. 55: 1505–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moreau, F., and M. Moreau, 1953. Étude du développement de quelques Aspergillacees. Rev. Mycol. 18: 165–180.Google Scholar
  71. Nannfeldt, J.A., 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-licheni-sierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsala, Ser. IV 8(2):1–368.Google Scholar
  72. Nichols, M.A., 1896. The morphology and development of certain pyrenomycetous fungi. Bot. Gaz. 22: 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nicot, J., and D. Longis, 1961. Structure des spores et organisation des périthèces de deux Thielavia du sol. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 253: 304–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Novak, E., and J. Galcozy, 1966. Notes on dermatophytes of soil origin. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 28: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Olive, L.S., 1944. Development of the perithecium in Aspergillus fischeri Wehmer, with a description of crozier formation. Mycologia 36: 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Paden, J.W., and J.V. Cameron, 1972. Morphology of Warcupia terrestris, a new ascomycete genus and species from soil. Can. J. Bot. 50: 999–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Parguey-Leduc, A., 1970. Le développement des périthèces du Lepidosphaeria nicotiae. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 86: 715–724.Google Scholar
  78. Parguey-Leduc, A., 1974. Les asques et l’ontogenie des périthèces chez les Trichodelitschia. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 90: 101–120.Google Scholar
  79. Rai, J.N., and K. Wadhwani, 1970. Anixiella indica—Studies in ascocarp development and ascus cytology. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. (Tokyo) 16: 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Redhead, S.A., and D. Malloch, 1977. The Endomycetaceae: New concepts, new taxa. Can. J. Bot. 55: 1701–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Routien, J.B., 1956. A new species of Muellerella and its development. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 83: 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Samson, R.A., and J. Mouchacca, 1975. Two new soil-borne cleistothecial ascomycetes. Can. J. Bot. 53: 1634–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Satina, S., 1918. Studies in the development of certain Sordariaceae. Bull. Nat. Moscow 1918: 166-142.Google Scholar
  84. Satina, S., 1923. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Ascomyceten Magnusia nitida Sacc. I. Befruchtung und Entwicklungsgeschichte des Peritheciums; Nebenfruchtform des Pilzes. Bot. Ark. 3: 273–381.Google Scholar
  85. Subramanian, C.V., 1972. The perfect states of Aspergillus. Curr. Sci. 41: 755–761.Google Scholar
  86. Udagawa, S., and M. Takada, 1973. The rediscovery of Aphanoascus cinnabarinus. J. Jap. Bot. 48: 21–26.Google Scholar
  87. Upadhyay, H.P., and W.B. Kendrick, 1975. Prodromus for a revision of Ceratocystis (Microascales, ascomycetes) and its conidial states. Mycologia 67: 798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vincens, F., 1917. Une nouvelle espece de Melanospora: M. mangini. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 33: 67–69.Google Scholar
  89. von Arx, J.A., 1971. Testudinaceae, a new family of ascomycetes. Persoonia 6: 365–369.Google Scholar
  90. von Arx, J.A., 1975. On Thielavia and some similar genera of ascomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 8: 1–29.Google Scholar
  91. von Arx, J.A., and E. Müller, 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beitr. Krypt. Fl. Schweiz 11: 1–434.Google Scholar
  92. Webster, J., 1970. Introduction to Fungi. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
  93. Whiteside, W.C., 1961. Morphological studies in the Chaetomiaceae. I. Mycologia 53: 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Whiteside, W.C., 1962. Morphological studies in the Chaetomiaceae. III. Mycologia 54: 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Young, E.M., 1931. The morphology and cytology of Monascus ruber. Amer. J. Bot. 18: 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Malloch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations