Eutrophication Trends in the Water Quality of the Rhode River (1971–1978)

  • David L. Correll
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Science and Society book series (CISS)


Five to eight-year data sets on turbidity and a series of nutrient parameters have been taken in the Rhode River, a small tidal river tributary to Chesapeake Bay. Trends of change at headwater stations indicate changes due primarily to local watershed runoff, while changes at stations near the river’s mouth are indicative of changes in Chesapeake Bay.

The data have been analyzed first by summarizing as monthly and seasonal means and variances, then by looking for year-to-year trends. Thus, for example, linear regressions of summer and fall turbidity versus time for 1971–1978 had very low slopes and low coefficients of determination. An interesting finding was the pattern for total phosphorus in surface waters. At the mouth of Rhode River, seasonal mean concentrations increased steadily for each season each year from the fall of 1971 to the fall of 1976. The most dramatic increases (four-fold) were observed in the summer and fall. A much smaller increase occurred in winter and spring values. In contrast, year-to-year concentrations of total phosphorus in surface waters in upstream stations over the same time period showed less clear-cut trends. Also, phosphorus loadings from local watershed runoff fluctuated widely, but had no steady rapid rise with time. Although total phosphorus increased dramatically at the mouth of Rhode River, dissolved orthophosphate, nitrate, and dissolved ammonia remained essentially constant, especially in the summer and fall. These data could indicate an increasing impact of summertime anoxic bottom waters on the phosphorus dynamics of the upper western shore of the Bay.


Total Phosphorus Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Land Runoff Anoxic Bottom Water Total Phosphorus Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Public Health Association. 1976. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 14 Ed. APHA, N.Y.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brush, L.M., Jr. 1974. Inventory of Sewage Treatment Plants for Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publ. No. 28, 62 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpenter, J.H., Pritchard, D.W., Whaley, R.C. 1967. Observations on Eutrophication and Nutrient Cycles in Some Coastal Plain Estuaries. In Lauff, G.H. (ed.) Estuaries. Publ. No. 83, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Washington, D.C. pp. 210–221.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, L.J., Donnelly, D.K., Villa, O., Jr. 1973. Nutrient Enrichment and Control Requirements in the Upper Chesapeake Bay. EPA Report No. 903/9-73-002-a.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Correll, D.L. 1977. An Overview of the Rhode River Watershed Program. In Correll, D.L. (ed.), Watershed Research in Eastern North America. Smithsonian Institution Chesapeake Bay Center for Environmental Studies, Edgewater, Md. pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Correll, D.L. 1977. Indirect Effects of tropical storm Agnes upon the Rhode River. In The Effects of Tropical Storm Agnes on the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine System, Chesapeake Research Consortium, Publ. No. 54, pp. 288–298, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Correll, D.L., Faust, M.A., Severn, D.J. 1975. Phosphorus flux and cycling in estuaries. In Cronin, L.E. (ed.), Estuarine Research 1: 108–136. Academic Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faust, M.A., Correll, D.L. 1976. Comparison of bacterial and algal utilization of orthophosphate in an estuarine environment. Marine Biology 34: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, G. 1975. Observations on the hydrodynamics of the Rhode River and a Kinematic salt balance model. Chesapeake Bay Institute Tech. Report 89 (Ref. 75–1).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    King, E.V. 1932. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Biochem. J. 26: 292–297.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin, D.F. 1972. Marine Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, Inc., N.Y. pp. 174–176.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nie, N.H., Hull, C.J. Jenkins, J.G. Steinbrenner, K., Bent, D.H. (eds.). 1975. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. (KU version 6.02B-1) 675 pp.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richards, F.A., Kletsch, R.A. 1964. The spectrophotometric determination of ammonia and labile amino compounds in fresh and seawater by oxidation to nitrite. Sugawara Festival Volume, Maruza Co., Ltd. Tokyo, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strickland, J.D., Parsons, T.R. 1965. A manual of seawater analysis. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 125, 2nd Ed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Humana Press Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Correll
    • 1
  1. 1.Chesapeake Bay Center for Environmental StudiesEdgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations