Advertisement

Ultrasonic Measurement Techniques and Equipment Output Levels

  • Harold F. Stewart
Part of the Medical Methods book series (MM)

Abstract

The accurate measurement of the output levels of medical diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound equipment have become important to manufacturers and users as a result of the increasing use of these devices. Such measurements are important for several reasons. First, there is the question of possible risk to health associated with diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound. Accurate measurements of ultrasound levels used in biological effects investigations are needed so that other investigators can repeat the experiments. In addition, it is desirable that the output from equipment in clinical use be known so that it can be related to reported biological effects (Nyborg, 1977; Stratmeyer, 1977; Stewart et al., 1977; Stratmeyer and Stewart. 1979). Second, measurement procedures are necessaryfor the calibration of ultrasonic equipment (e.g., theraphy instruments) in which there is a need to provide a known exposure for various treatments. Third, it is important from the standpoint of equipment performance to know the ultrasonic output of equipment in relation to other performance parameters such as imaging capabality. Fourth , accurate measurement methods are needed if regulatory agencies are to evaluate equipment to ensure the proper calibration in compliance with performance standards (Federal Register, 1978, 1979; Repacholi and Benwell, 1979; Stewart et. al., 1980).

Keywords

Output Level Radiation Force Ultrasonic Power Ultrasound Beam Ultrasonic Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abzug, J. L., Evaluation of Ohmic Instrument Company Model UPM-30 Ultrasound Power Meter, HEW Publication (FDA) 79–8075, November, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Carson, P. L., Fischella, P. R., and Oughton, T. V., Ultrasonic power and intensities produced by diagnostic ultrasound equipment, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 341–350, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cartensen, E. L., Self–reciprocity calibration of electroacoustic transducers, Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 961–966, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstensen, E. L., and Child, S. Z., American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 1979 Mtg., Montreal, Abstract, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, J., Bessel fringes, Opt. Commun. 16, 141, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Commun. Electron., American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Paper No. 60–35, July 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, B., Determination of finite amplitude distortion by light diffraction, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 32, 336, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, B. D., and Berlinghier, J. C. Calibration of ultrasonic fields from acousto-optic data using fourier transform techniques theory, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 61, 1477, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, H., Weaver, J. B., and Pearson, J. F., Doppler ultrasound and fetal activity, Brit. Med. J. 2, 62–64, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Reggi, A. S., Roth, S., Kenny, J., and Edelman, S., Polymeric ultrasonic probe (abstract), J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 64, Suppl. No. 1, 55–56, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Dragonette, L., Schlieren visualization of radiation caused by illumination of plates with short acoustic pulses, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 920, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunbar, L. E., Torque feedback radiometer for ultrasonic power measurements, J. Clin. Ultrasound 4, No. 4, 293 — 295, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunn, F., A primary method for the determination of ultrasonic intensity with the elastic sphere radiometer, Acustica 38, (1), 58–61, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Dyson, M., and Pond, J., Effects of ultrasound on circulation, Physiotherapy 59, (9), 284–287, Sept. 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eggleton, R. C., and Wolfla, L. H., A radiation force balance for calibration of ultrasonic visualization equipment, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Endo, T., Okumura, T., Miyasaki, H., Ohta, Y., and Fukamuchi, M., Power reduction of doppler instrument for safety, Med. Ultrason. II, no. 1, 91–94, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Erikson, K. R., Calibration of standard ultrasonic probe transducers using light diffraction, HEW Publication (FDA) 73–8008, 193–187, Sept. 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Farmery, M. J., and Whittingham, T. A., A portable radiation force balance for use with diagnostic ultrasonic equipment, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 3, 373–377, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fry, W. J., and Fry, W. B., Determination of absolute sound levels and acoustic absorption coefficients by thermocouple probes, J. Acoust. Soc Amer. 25, 294–310, May 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fry, W. J., and Dunn, F., Ultrasound analysis and experimental methods in biological research, in Physical Techniques in Biological Research, Vol. 4, Special Methods, Nastuk, W. L., ed., Academic Press, New York, 1962, 261–394.Google Scholar
  21. Federal Register 43, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Ultrasonic therapy products radiation safety performance standard, No. 34, Part VI, Title 21, Part 1050, pp. 7166–7172, February 17, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Federal Register 44, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Diagnostic ultrasound equipment, notice of intent to propose rules and develop recommendations, No. 31, pp. 9542–9545, Tuesday, February 13, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Greenspan, M., Breckinridge, F. R., and Tschiegg, C. E., Ultrasonic transducer power output by modulated radiation pressure (with details), NBS publication, NBSIR 78–1520, July 1978.Google Scholar
  24. Haran, M. E., Ultrasonic acousto-optic measurement techniques, in Symposium on Biological Effects and Characterization of Ultrasound Sources, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8044, 90–98, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Haran, M. E., Visualization and measurement of ultrasonic wavefronts, IEEE Proc. 67, No. 4, 454–466. April 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haran, M. E., Cook, B. D., and Stewart, H. F., A comparison of an acousto-optic and radiation force method of measuring ultrasonic power, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 57, 1436–1440, June 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, G. R., Herman, B. A., Haran, M. E., and Smith, S. W., Calibration and use of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones, Symposium on Biological Effects and Characterizations of Ultrasound Sources, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–08044, pp. 169–174, June 2–3, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Hasegawa, T., Acoustic radiation force on a sphere in quasista-tionary wave field-experiment, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 65, No. 1, 41, January 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herman, B. A., Stewart, H. F., Robinson, R. A., and Zienuik, G., Thermal methods for low level ultrasonic energy measurement, in Symposium on Biological Effects and Characterizations of Ultrasound Sources, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8044, 145–152, 1977.Google Scholar
  30. Herrey, E. M. J., Experimental studies on acoustic radiation pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 891–896, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hertz, R. H., Timor–Tritseh I, Dierker, L., Check, L., Rosen, M. G., Continuous ultrasound and fetal movement, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 135, 152–154, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, C. R., Acoustic intensity measurement on ultrasonic diagnostic devices, in Ultrasongraphia Medica, Bock, J., and Ossoinig, J., eds., First World Congress on Ultrasonic Diagnostic in Medicine and SIDUO III, June 2–7, 1959. Vienna-Austria, Verlag Der Wichger Medizinischen Akademie.Google Scholar
  33. Hueter, T. F., and Bolt, R. H., Sonics, Wiley, New York, 1955, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, J. B., A calorimetric method and apparatus for evaluating transducer assemblies, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrasonics 16, 76–78, April 1–969.Google Scholar
  35. Koppelmann, V. J., Brendel, K., and Wolf, J., Calibration of underwater sound transducers in the frequency range: 75 KHz to 2 MHz, Acustica 25, 73–80, 1971.Google Scholar
  36. Kossoff, G., Calibration of ultrasonic therapeutic equipment, Acustica 12, 84, 1962.Google Scholar
  37. Kossoff, G., Balance technique of measurement of very low ultrasonic powers, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 38, 880 — 881, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewin, P. A., Ultrasound induced damage of biological tissue, PhD Thesis, AFM 78–16, Copenhagen, Technical University of Denmark, 1978.Google Scholar
  39. Lewin, P. A., and Jensen, F., The use of miniature transducers for measurement in penetralli media, in Proceedings of the Ultrasonic International 79, IPC Press, Guildford, Surrey, England, 1979.Google Scholar
  40. MacLean, W. R., Absolute measurement of sound without a primary standard, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 12, 140, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, C. J., Gemmel, H. G., and Watmough, D. J., A study of streaming in plant tissue induced by a doppler fetal heart detector, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 4, 131–138, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mezrich, R., Etzold K., and Vilkomerson, D., A system for visualizing and measuring ultrasonic wavefronts, Acoustical Holography, vol. 6, Booth, N., ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1975, p. 165.Google Scholar
  43. Murai, N. K., Hoshi, K., and Nakamura, T., Effects of diagnostic ultrasound irradiated during fetal stage on development of orienting behavior reflex ontogery in rats, Tohoka J. Exp. Med. 116, 17–024, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neubaurer, W., and Dragonette, L., A schlieren system used for making movies of sound waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 49, 410, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nyborg, W. L., Physical mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8062, Washington, DC, September, 1977.Google Scholar
  46. Oberst, H., and Rieckmann, P., Methods of measurement used by the federal institute of physical technology for the evaluation and certificaion of medical ultrasonic instruments, Physickal– isch Technischen Bundesanstalt, Hs, S. 35, 1953.Google Scholar
  47. Raman, C. F., and Nath, N. S. N., The diffraction of light by high frequency sound wave, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 2, 406, 1935; 2, 413, 1935; 3, 75, 1936; 3, 119, 1936; 33, 459, 1936.Google Scholar
  48. Reid, J. M., Self–reciprocity calibration of echo-ranging transducers, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 55, No. 4, 862–868, April 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Repacholi, M. H., and Benwell, D. A., Using surveys of ultrasonic therapy devices to draft performance standards, Health Physics 36, 679–686, June 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riley, W., and Barnes, R., Observation of pulsed medical ultrasound gratinas in the optical farfield, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 62, 511, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rooney, J. N., and Nyborg, W. L., Acoustic radiation pressure in a travelling plane wave, Am. J. Phys. 40, 1825–1830, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rooney, J. A., Acoustic radiation pressure and its use in power and intensity determinations, presentation at 84th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, November 28–December 1, 1972, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  53. Rooney, J. A., Determination of acoustic power outputs in the microwatt–milliwatt range, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1, 1 — 16, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson, R. A., Radiation force techniques for laboratory and field measurements of ultrasonic power, Symposium on Bioeffects and Characterizations of Ultrasound Sources, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8044, June 2–3, 1977, pp. 114–124.Google Scholar
  55. Sikov, M. R., Hildebrand, B. P., and Stearns, J. D., Postnatal sequelae of ultrasound exposure at fifteen days in gestation in the rat, paper presented at the 3rd World Congress of Ultrasonics in Medicine, 3B 2–17–2023, August 3–7, San Francisco, 1976.Google Scholar
  56. Simmons, B. D., and Urich, R., Plane wave reciprocity parameters and its application to calibration of electroacoustic transducers at close distances, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 21, 633–635, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sokollu, A., Absolute measurement of total radiated power of ultrasonic transducers for biomedical use, Bull. Lab. Electro-acoustique Univ. Liege 9, 23 — 27, April 1966.Google Scholar
  58. Stanic, S., Quantitative schlieren visualization, Appl. Optics, 17, 837, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stewart, H. F., Harris, G. R., Robinson, R. A., and Garry, J., Survey of use and performance of ultrasonic therapy units in the Washington, D.C. area, in Health Physics in the Healing Arts, HEW Publication (FDA) 73–8029, March 1974, pp. 467–472.Google Scholar
  60. Stewart, H. F., Harris, G. R., and Frost, H. M., Development of principles and concepts for specification of ultrasonic diagnostic equipment performance, Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 3B, Engineering Aspects, proceedings of the first triennial meeting of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Plenum, 1977, pp. 2115–2142.Google Scholar
  61. Stewart, H. F., Abzug, J. L., and Harris, G. R., Considerations in ultrasound therapy and equipment performance, Physical Therapy, 60, 424–428, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stewart, H. F., and Stratmeyer, M. E., An Overview of Ultrasound: Theory, Measurement, Medical Applications and Biological Effects, HHS Publication (FDA) 82–XXXX, Washington, D.C. (in press).Google Scholar
  63. Stewart, H. F., Ultrasonic measuring techniques, fundamental and applied aspects of non-ionizing radiation, Plenum, New York, 1975, 57–83.Google Scholar
  64. Stewart, H. F., Diagnostic ultrasonic output levels and quality assurance measurements, proceedings of the eleventh annual National Conference on Radiation Control, May 6–10, 1979.Google Scholar
  65. Stratmeyer, M. E., Research directions in ultrasound bioeffects-a public health view, Symposium on Biological Effects and Characterizations of Ultrasound Sources, HEW Publication (FDA) 78–8044, June 23, 1977, pp. 240–245.Google Scholar
  66. Stratmeyer, M. E., and Christman, C. L., Biological effects of ultrasound, in Obstetrical Intervention and Technologies in the 80s, Hayward Press (in press) 1982.Google Scholar
  67. Swamy, K. A., Lakshminarayana, K., Marty, S. J., and Swamy, P. S., Excess ultrasonic absorption in water and primary alcohols, Acustica 27 23–27, 1972.Google Scholar
  68. Van Den Ende, H., A radiation power calorimeter and radiation force meter for small ultrasonic beams, Med. Biol. Eng. 7, 411–417, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wells, P. N. T., Bullen, N. A., Follett, D. H., Freundlich, H. F., and Angell, J. J., The dosimetry of small ultrasonic beams, Ultrasonics, pp. 106–110, 1963.Google Scholar
  70. Wemlen, A., A milliwatt ultrasonic servo-controlled balance, Med. Biol. Eng. 6, 159–165, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yosioka, K., Hasegawa, T., and Omura, A., Comparison of ultrasonic intensity from the radiation force on steel spheres with that on liquid spheres, Acustica, 22, pp. 145—152, 1969/70.Google Scholar
  72. Zapf, T. L., Calibration of quartz transducers as ultrasonic power standards by an electrical method, Ultrasonic Symposium Proceedings, IEEE Cat. No. 74 CHO 896–ISU, 1974.Google Scholar
  73. Zapf, T. L., Harvey, M. E., Larsen, M. T., and Stoltenbergy, R. E., Ultrasonic calorimeter for beam power measurements, NBS Tech. Note 686, SD Catalog No. C-13, 46;686, US DPO, Washington, DC, 1976.Google Scholar
  74. Zemanek, J., Beam behavior within the nearfield of vibrating piston, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 49, 181–191, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ziedonis, J. J. G., Pressure balance design for measuring ultrasonic energy, paper presented at the 84th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Miami, Florida, November 28, 1972.Google Scholar
  76. Ziedonis, J. G., Ultrasonic power levels used in commercial equipment for medical applications and how to control it for patients safety, Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 47, 110–110 August 1–2, 1974.Google Scholar
  77. Zieniuk, J. K., and Evans, B., The influence of thermal parameters on making ultrasonic power measurements by a calorimetric method, Acustica 25, 47–52, 1971.Google Scholar
  78. Zieniuk, J., and Chivers, R. C., Measurement of ultrasonic exposure with radiation force and thermal methods, Ultrasonics, 14, 161–172, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The HUMANA Press Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold F. Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Radiological HealthFDARockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations