Skip to main content

Ethical Dilemmas in Social Research

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Social Research

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

What kinds of ethical dilemmas arise in social research? This chapter describes the set of dilemmas that confronts investigators, and indicates how and why dilemmas arise and why social scientists are largely unprepared to solve them. The major ethical and scientific values that are available to guide social scientists are examined along with some of the characteristics of effective problem solving that underlie the work presented in subsequent chapters. Emphasis is placed on the creative use of alternative social science methods and value systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C. Intervention theory and method. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70 (9, Whole No. 416).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermant, G., Kelman, H., & Warwick, D. The ethics of social intervention. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R., & Cecil, J. Methods for assuring confidentiality of social research data. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. Invisible colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. Against methodology: Outline of an anarchistic theory of know-ledge. London: NLB, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. The regulatory context of social research: The work of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects. In C. B. Klockars & F. W. O’Connor (Eds.), Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. Perception and discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. Thematic origins of scientific thought, Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. On being caught between dionysians and apollonians. In G. Holton (Ed.), Science and its public: The changing relationship. Boston: Daedalus, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., & Mann, L. Decision making. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. A time to speak: On human values and social research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B., & O’Connor, F. W. (Eds.). Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, C. B. Dirty hands and deviant subjects. In C. B. Klockars & F. W. O’Connor (Eds.), Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. E. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, W. Can an is become an ought? Paper given at California Polytechnic Institute, Pomona Faculty Retreat, June 17, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Kilmann, R. H. Methodological approaches to social science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I., & Chubin, D.E. Peer review: A dialectical policy analysis. Unpublished paper, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78–0012). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, F. W. The ethical demands of the Belmont Report. In C. Klockars & F. W. O’Connor (Eds.), Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J. Governmental regulation of scientific inquiry: Some paradoxical consequences. In C. B. Klockars & F. W. O’Connor (Eds.), Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A. M., & Timpane, P. M. Introduction and summary. In A. M. Rivlin & P. M. Timpane (Eds.), Ethical and legal issues of social experimentation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. Ordinary ecstasy: Humanistic psychology in action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hoffman, N. Sociological snoopers. The Washington Post, January 30, 1970, pp.B1; B9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60, 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. The randomized response method. In R. Boruch, J. Ross, & J. Cecil (Eds.), Proceedings and background papers: Conference on ethical and legal problems in applied social research. Northwestern University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, D. P. The teaching of ethics in social sciences. Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.: The Hastings Center, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. Behaviorism (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences. (E. Shils & H. A. Finch, Eds. and trans.) Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1949. (Originally published in three parts in 1904, 1905, and 1917.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, R. S. Newton and the fudge factor. Science, 1913,179, 751–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sieber, J.E. (1982). Ethical Dilemmas in Social Research. In: Sieber, J.E. (eds) The Ethics of Social Research. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5721-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5719-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics