Skip to main content

Professional Autonomy and Employers’ Authority

  • Chapter
Profits and Professions

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society ((CIBES))

  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

Need for establishing authority arises in circumstances where unrestrained individual discretion in decision-making conflicts with a desired degree of social organization and order. Accordingly, submitting to authority typically involves a willingness to accept some policies and directives that on their own merits one may find inadequate. Even to submit to the authority of a basketball referee requires playing by occasionally bad or even outrageous rulings. Similarly, an employee who regards the employer as having legitimate authority over him or her acknowledges the necessity to adhere to at least some of the employer’s orders and the company’s regulations whose rationale may be found wanting. Doing so voluntarily is part of being a faithful agent and trustee of the employer. Presumably this holds true for the many areas of business operations that affect the safety, health, and welfare of the general public. Many employees, however, are also members of a profession. As such, they are generally regarded as obligated to exercise their independent skilled judgment in a manner they calculate will avoid harm and promote the good of the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Herbert A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, 3rd Edition (New York: Free Press, 1976), pp. 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p.151; p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., pp. 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Printed in Ethical Problems in Engineering, 2nd Edition, Vol. 1, Albert Flores, ed., (Troy: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Press, 1980), pp. 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert L. Whitelaw, “The Professional Status of the American Engineer: A Bill of Rights,” Professional Engineer (August, 1975), pp. 37–41. Reprinted in Flores, op. cit., pp. 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Moral Blueprints,” Harper’s 257 (October, 1978), p. 32. Cf. Chapter 3 of Florman’s earlier book The Existential Pleasures of Engineering (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For this general distinction see John Rawls, “Two Concepts of Rules,” Philosophical Review, 64 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Leo Cass and William Curran, “Rights of Privacy in Medical Practice,” reprinted in Moral Problems in Medicine, Samuel Gorovitz et al., eds. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1976), pp. 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. William Lowrance, Of Acceptable Risk (Los Altos: Kaufman, 1976), Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert Baum, “The Limits of Professional Responsibility,” in Flores, op. cit., pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul Eddy et al., Destination Disaster (New York: Quadrangle, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Vandivier, “Engineers, Ethics and Economics,” Conference on Engineering Ethics (New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1975), pp. 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Carl W. Houston and Stone and Webster,” Whistleblowing, Ralph Nader et al. (New York: Grossman Publishers, 1972), pp. 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For an analysis of the concept of “organizational disobedience” see James Otten, “Organizational Disobedience,” in Flores, op. cit., pp. 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For an attempted defense of the latter denial with respect to state authority, see Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism (New York: Harper and Row, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 The Humana Press Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, M.W. (1983). Professional Autonomy and Employers’ Authority. In: Robison, W.L., Pritchard, M.S., Ellin, J. (eds) Profits and Professions. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5625-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5625-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5627-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5625-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics