Abstract
Imagine a slaveholder trying to be fair in settling a dispute between two slaves, trying to be just in distributing the slop made available to the slaves as food, or in making sure that they are all whipped equally, or at least equally for equal offenses. There is certainly a sense in which the slaveholder is trying to be fair, just, or moral within the slave-owning system. Yet most Americans would readily admit that slavery is immoral. The slaveholder who tries to be moral within the system of slavery may have some grounds for feeling superior to the slaveholder who cares not at all about the slaves, who beats them arbitrarily, who starves them out of malice, or who settles disputes between them by whim. But surely a discussion of the moral way to treat one’s slaves, though it might do some good, has an odd ring to it. For it deals with the morality of practices within a system that itself should be morally evaluated—and if morally evaluated by our standards is morally condemned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
“Moral Issues in Business,” Ethics, Free Enterprise, and Public Policy, R. De George and J. Pichler, eds. (New York: Oxford, 1978).
For a good survey of what some corporations have done, see John L. Paluszek, Will the Corporation Survive? (Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing Company Inc., 1977).
Leonard Silk and David Vogel, Ethics and Profits (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1976).
See, for example, Amitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964)
Herbert A. Simon, Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed. (New York: Free Press, 1965).
This has been developed by John Ladd, “Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations,” The Monist, 54 (1970), 488–516.
There is a growing literature on the social audit. See David F. Linowes, “The Corporate Sociate Audit,” in Social Responsibility and Accountability, Jules Backman, ed. (New York: NYU Press, 1975); Corporate Social Accounting, Meinolf Dierkes and Raymond A. Bauer, eds. (New York: Praeger, 1973; and Clark C. Abt, The Social Audit for Management (New York: AMACOM, 1977).
Corporate Social Accounting, Meinolf Dierkes and Raymond A. Bauer, eds. (New York: Praeger, 1973
Clark C. Abt, The Social Audit for Management (New York: AMACOM, 1977).
Paluszek, op. cit., pp. 67–68.
The 1974 DC-10 case is a classic. See Paul Eddy, Elaine Potter, and Bruce Page, Destination Disaster (New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co., 1976), especially pp. 283–284.
See Whistle Blowing, Ralph Nader, Peter J. Petkas, and Kate Blackwell, eds. (New York: Grossman, 1972).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 The Humana Press Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De George, R.T. (1983). The Social Business of Business. In: Robison, W.L., Pritchard, M.S., Ellin, J. (eds) Profits and Professions. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5625-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5625-0_12
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5627-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5625-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive