Infrared Properties of Unusual Initial State Interactions

  • Charles A. Nelson
Part of the Progress in Physics book series (PMP, volume 8)

Abstract

The related roles of gauge invariance and of initial coherent/ degenerate states in the factorization of QCD processes into short-distance and long-distance parts are discussed. For ππ →μ+μ - + X it is shown that although the systematic summation over all possible spectator interactions removes the outside soft-IR divergences in the non- overlapping ladder Glauber diagrams, unphysical inside soft-IR divergences persist. So, the on-shell Glauber region is not a gauge invariant concept which can be physically isolated from radiative corrections which non-trivially involve other diagrammatic regions. It is conjectured that in QCD non-factorization is inconsistent with local gauge invariance.

Keywords

Coherence Posite Milton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Doria, J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B169. 93 (1980); C. DiLieto, S. Gendron, I. C. Halliday and C. T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B183, 223 (1981); C. E. Carneiro, M. Day, J. Frenkel, J. C. Taylor and M. T. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. 45B183, 445 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. A. Nelson, Nucl. Phys. B186, 187; B181, 141 (1981); D. R. Butler and C. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D18, 1196 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Andrasi, M. Day, R. Doria, J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B182, 104 (1981); I. Ito, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 1466 (1981); 67, 1216 (1982); N. Yoshida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 269, 1803 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Fukuda, Phys. Lett. 73B, 33 (1978), and see references in Y. Kazama (these Proceedings).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Kinoshita, J. Math. Phys. 3, 650 (1962); T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 133B, 1549 (1964); E. C. Poggio and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D14, 578 (1976); G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D14, 2123 (1976); and G. Sterman and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1436 (1977). Compare J. Cornwall and G. Tlktopoulos, Phys. Rev. D15, 2937 (1977); T. Kinoshita and A. Ukawa, Phys. Rev. D15, 1396 (1977); T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Nucl. Phys. B120, 77 (1977) and references in G. Sterman, A.I.P. Conf. Proc. No. 74 (ed. D. W. Duke and J. P. Owens, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Frenkel, J. G. M. Gatheral and J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B194, 172 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. A. Nelson, SUNY BING 10/18/82 (to appear in Nucl. Phys.).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Canapathi and C. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D23, 248 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Muta and C. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D25, 2222 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. T. Bodwin, S. J. Brodsky and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47. 1799 (1981); SLAC-PUB-2927 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. H. Mueller, Phys. Lett. 108B, 355 (1982) and CU-TP-232; J. Collins, D. Soper and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. 109B109B, 388 (1982) and ITP-SB-82-46; G. Date, ITP-SB-82-47.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Lindsay, D. Ross and C. Sachrajda, Phys. Lett. 117B, 105 (1982) and SHEP-81/82-6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. A. Nelson, SUNY BING 11/25/82 (to appear in Nucl. Phys.).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. R. Yennie, S. C. Frautschi and H. Suura, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 13, 379 (1961); G. Grammer and D. R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. D8, 4332 (1973). Compare, S. Libby and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D18, 3252 (1978); J. C. Collins and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B185, 172 (1981); J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, 0ITS 155; and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D24, 3281 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. J. Brodsky (these Proceedings).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles A. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsSUNYBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations