Abstract
Attitudes are a central feature of our social lives. Daily, we are called upon or feel compelled to express our views on a variety of topics. Equally often, we are exposed to attempts to change these attitudes. Some classic research in social psychology clearly makes the point that the social context in which people find themselves is a crucial determinant of their attitudes. For example, Newcomb (1943) in his research on Bennington College coeds found that students who were initially highly conservative, gradually came to adopt the liberal views espoused by the college community over the course of their stay there. The fact that people and their attitudes are located in social matrices has been suggested as one reason that field studies of attitude change typically find weaker effects than laboratory studies (Hovland, 1959). In laboratory research people are typically exposed to a persuasive communication in social isolation, but in field research and in “real life” people often receive messages in the company of others. As a result, subjects in laboratory research may feel that the message is aimed at them in particular which enhances its impact, whereas in the natural environment the perception may be that the message is aimed at people in general. Also, when other people are present, a message recipient might hear various individual group members make statements in opposition to the position outlined by the message source. This would also reduce the impact of the message.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aderman, D., Brehm, S., & Katz, L. Empathic observation of an innocent victim: The just world revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 342–347.
Beatty, J. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91, 276–292.
Brock, T. C. Implications of commodity theory for value change. In A. Greenwald, T. Brock, & T. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Cacioppo, J. T. Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationships to behavior. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. The effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 97–109.
Calder, B., Insko, C., & Yandell, B. The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 62–93.
Cohen, A. R. Communication discrepancy and attitude change: A dissonance theory approach. Journal of Personality, 1959, 27, 386–396.
Cottrell, N. Social facilitation. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
Fromkin, H. L., & Brock, T. C. Erotic materials: A commodity theory analysis of availability and desirability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973, 3, 219–231.
Goethals, G., & Nelson, E. Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 117–122.
Goethals, G., & Zanna, M. The role of social comparison in choice shifts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 1469–1476.
Greenwald, A. G. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Harkins, S., Latané, B., & Williams, K. Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 457–465.
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 3, 401–413. (a)
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. The multiple source effect in persuasion: The effects of distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981, 4, 627–635. (b)
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. The effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 1214–1229.
Harrison, A. Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Hovland, C. I. Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 8–17.
Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 371–384.
Insko, C., Lind, E., & La Tour, S. Persuasion, recall and thoughts. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1976, 7, 66–78.
Jellison, J., & Riskind, J. A social comparison of abilities interpretation of risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15, 375–390.
Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley, 1967.
Kahneman, S. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Keating, J., & Latané, B. Politicans on TV: The image is the message. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 116–132.
Kerr, N., & Bruun, S. Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981, 7, 224–231.
Knower, F. H. Experimental studies of changes in attitude: I. A study of the effect of oral argument on changes of attitude. Journal of Social Psychology, 1935, 6, 315–347.
Knower, F. H. Experimental studies of changes in attitude: II. A study of the effects of printed arguments on changes of attitude. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1936, 30, 522–532.
Krech, D., Crutchfield, R., & Ballachey, E. Individual in society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Lamm, H., & Myers, D. Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Latané, B. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 1981, 4, 343–356.
Latané, B., Williams, K. D., & Harkins, S. G. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 822–832.
Myers, D. The inflated self. New York: Seabury Press, 1980.
Newcomb, T. M. Personality and social change. New York: Dryden, 1943.
Newton, J., & Mann, L. Crowd size as a factor in the persuasion process: A study of religious crusade meetings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 874–883.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1919, 37, 1915–1926.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown, 1981.
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D., & Latané, B. The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 579–582.
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 1, 81–92.
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 874–884.
Reckman, R., & Goethals, G. Deviancy and group orientation as determinants of group composition preferences. Sociometry, 1973, 36, 419–423.
Steiner, I. Group process and group productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Wicklund, R. A., Cooper, J., & Linder, D. Effects of expected effort on attitude change prior to exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 2, 416–428.
Wilder, D. Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 253–268.
Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latané, B. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 303–311.
Zimbardo, P. G. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order, versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos, In W. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 17). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harkins, S.G., Petty, R.E. (1983). Social Context Effects in Persuasion: The Effects of Multiple Sources and Multiple Targets. In: Paulus, P.B. (eds) Basic Group Processes. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5580-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5578-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive