Advertisement

The Alleged Babylonian Discovery of the Precession of the Equinoxes

  • O. Neugebauer

Abstract

Historians constantly face two closely related problems: to make new textual material available and to destroy generally accepted theories. The present paper is concerned with the latter aspect, in the case of the more and more frequently quoted statement that the Babylonian astronomer Kidinnu was the discoverer of the precession of the equinoxes and that this event can be dated in 379 b. c., thus antedating Hipparchus by about two and one-half centuries. It may seem as if we were dealing here with one of those questions of priority which are of very little significance. Actually the problem has wider implications. It is closely related to the problem of the date of origin of Babylonian mathematical astronomy, which exercised a deep influence on Greek astronomy and its continuation in the Middle Ages. It is furthermore of importance for the evaluation of Babylonian astronomy and the mutual role of observation versus theory during the Seleucid period.

Keywords

Summer Solstice Lunar Theory Autumn Equinox Observation Text Arabic Literature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Halma [CT], Commentaire de Théon d’Alexandrie sur les tables manuelles astronomiques de Ptolemée, I, Paris, 1822.Google Scholar
  2. F. X. Kugler [BMR], Babylonische Mondrechnung, Freiburg, 1900.Google Scholar
  3. F. X. Kugler [SSB], Sternkunde u. Sterndienst in Babel, 2 vols., Münster, 1907-1924.Google Scholar
  4. O. Neugebauer [1], Die babylonische Theorie der Breitenbewegung des Mondes, Quellen u. Studien z. Gesch. d. Math., Ser. B 4 (1938), p. 193–346.Google Scholar
  5. O. Neugebauer [2], Mathematical methods in ancient astronomy, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 54 (1948), p. 1013–1041.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. O. Neugebauer [3], Solstices and equinoxes in Babylonian astronomy during the Seleucid period, J. Cuneiform Studies, 2 (1949), p. 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. O. Neugebauer [4], A table of solstices from Uruk, J. Cuneiform Studies, 1 (1948), p. 143–148.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Rome [1], Le problème de l’équation du temps chez Ptolémée, Ann. Soc. Sci. de Bruxelles, sér. I, 59 (1939), p. 211–224.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. A. J. Sachs [1], A Classification of the Babylonian Astronomical Tablets of the Seleucid Period, to appear in the Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  10. P. Schnabel, Berossos und die babylonisch-hellenistische Literatur, Leipzig-Berlin, Teubner, 1923.Google Scholar
  11. P. Schnabel [1], Kidenas, Hipparch und die Entdeckung der Praezession, Zeitschr. f. Assyriol., 37 (1927), p. 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Neugebauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Brown UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations