Parasitology pp 127-140 | Cite as

The Australian School of Parasitology: Current Status and Prospects

  • Graham F Mitchell


The proceedings of a previous conference on parasitology in the United States,and the other contributions in this volume on the more global picture, contain a wealth of considered opinion of what the discipline of parasitology and its various subspecialties are all about. Because of this it may be pertinent for me to focus on a topic in which I can relay some firsthand information, that is, provide an update on the Australian School of Parasitology.' I hasten to emphasize that this analysis is through the eyes of a relative newcomer to the field. On the threshold of the biotechnology era, it may be useful to examine parasitology, and essentially research in parasitology, in this one corner of the globe. Are Australian parasitologists well placed to contribute to the projected revolution in biomedicine and to the continued strengthening of the discipline of parasitology in terms of both the accumulation of fundamental biological knowledge and practical outputs of research? Will we be able to attract the brightest and best of the medical, veterinary, and science graduates into this expanding field of research?


Australian School Echinococcus Granulosus Gastrointestinal Nematode Veterinary Parasitology Parasitology Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Warren KS, Purcell EF (eds) (1981) The current status and future of parasitology. Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sprent JFA (1966) The Australian School of Parasitology. Aust J Sci 29: 40–44Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arundel H, Rickard MD (This volume) Teaching veterinary parasitologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mackerras IM (1948) The Jackson Lecture: Australia’s contribution to our knowledge of insect-borne disease. Med J Aust 1: 157–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doherty RL (1978) The Bancroft tradition in infectious disease research in Queensland, Parts 1 and 2. Med J Aust 2: 560–563, 591-594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norris KR (1981) Ian Murray Mackerras-1898-1980. Historical records of Australian science Australian Academy of Science Publication, 5: 98–114Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Voller A, deSavigny D (1981) Diagnostic serology of tropical parasitic diseases. j Immunol Methods 4C:1–29Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sprent JFA (1959) Parasitism, immunity and evolution. In: Leeper GW (ed) The evolution of living organisms. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, p 149Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitchell GF, Anders RF, Brown GV, Handman E, Roberts-Thomson IC, Chapman CB, Forsyth KP, Kahl LP, Cruise KM (1982) Analysis of infection characteristics and antiparasite immune responses in resistant compared with susceptible hosts. Immunol Rev 61: 137–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitchell GF (1982) New trends towards vaccination against parasites. In: Capron A (ed) Clinics in immunology and allergy–immunoparasitology, Vol 2, No 2. Sounders, EastbourneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham F Mitchell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations