Athletic Aggression: A Moral Concern

  • Brenda Jo Bredemeier
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

Athletic aggression: Is it character-building and valuable or, perhaps, destructive and repugnant? Sport is an arena of human interaction where aggression and violence are sometimes idolized, sometimes condemned, but most often legitimated and at least tolerated. In this chapter the phenomenon of athletic aggression will be examined from social-scientific and ethical perspectives which have been informed by the study of moral development.

Keywords

Mold Assure Assimilation Posit Stein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt, H. On violence. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. Crisis of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Aronfreed, J. Conduct and conscience: The socialization of internalized control over behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Audi, R. Violence, legal sanctions and the law. In M. Stanage (Ed.), Reason and violence. Totowa, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., & McDonald, F. J. The influence of social reinforcement and the behavior of models in shaping children’s moral judgments. Journal of A bnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkowitz, L. The contagion of violence: An S-R mediational analysis of some effects of observed aggression. In W. J. Arnold & M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, L. Words and symbols as stimuli to aggressive responses. In J. F. Knutson (Ed.), Control of aggression: Implications from basic research. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Bredemeier, B. The assessment of reactive and instrumental athletic aggression. In D. Landers (Ed.), Psychology of sport and motor behavior. State College Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Bredemeier, B. Applications and implications of aggression research. In W. Straub (Ed.), Sport psychology: An analysis of athlete behavior. New York: Mouvement Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, R. Historical patterns of violence in America. In H. Graham & T. Gurr (Eds.), The history of violence in America: Historical and comparative perspectives. A report submitted to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. New York: Praeger, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1951, 21, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coakley, J. The sociological perspective: Alternative causations of violence in sport. Arena, 1981, 5(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
  15. Cohn, L. The road back. San Francisco Chronicle, August 20, 1982, p. 65.Google Scholar
  16. Damon, W. The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. Dodge, K., & Frame, C. Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Development, 1982, 53, 620–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. Frustration and aggression. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dreman, S. Sharing behavior in Israeli schoolchildren: Cognitive and social learning factors. Child Development, 1916, 47, 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feshbach, S. Reality and fantasy in filmed violence. In J. P. Murray, E. A. Rubinstein, & G. A. Comstock (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 2. Television and social learning. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Feshbach, S. The function of aggression and the regulation of aggressive drive. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 257–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  24. Freud, S. A general introduction to psycho-analysis. New York: Boni & liveright, 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freud, S. New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: Morton, 1933.Google Scholar
  26. Freud, S. Why war? In J. Strachey (Ed.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 5). London: Hogarth Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  27. Gerson, R., & Damon, W. Moral understanding and children’s conduct. New Directions for Child Development, 1978, 2, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C. In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 481–517.Google Scholar
  29. Gilligan, C. Justice and responsibility. In Toward moral and religious maturity. Palo Alto, Calif.: Silver Burdett, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Gilligan, C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982. (a)Google Scholar
  31. Gilligan, C. Why should a woman be more like a man? Psychology Today, 1982, 16, 68–77. (b)Google Scholar
  32. Goldstein, J. H. Aggression and crimes of violence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  33. Greendorfer, S. Socialization in sport. In C. Oglesby (Ed.), Women and sport: From myth to reality. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1978.Google Scholar
  34. Haan, N. Coping and defense mechanisms related to personality inventories. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 373–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haan, N. Moral reasoning in hypothetical and an actual situation of civil disobedience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1915, 32, 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haan, N. A manual for interactional morality. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 1977. (a)Google Scholar
  37. Haan, N. Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. San Francisco: Academic Press, 1977. (b)Google Scholar
  38. Haan, N., Bellah, R., Rabinow, P., & Sullivan, W. (Eds.), Social science as moral inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  39. Haan, N., Smith, M. B., & Block, J. Moral reasoning of young adults: Political-social behavior, family background, & personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 183–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haan, N., Stroud, J., & Holstein, C. Moral and ego stages in relationship to ego processes: A study of “hippies.” Journal of Personality, 1913, 41, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hart, H. Are there any natural rights? In A. Melden (Ed.), Human rights. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1970.Google Scholar
  42. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. Studies in the nature of character (2 vols.). New York: Macmillan, 1928–1930.Google Scholar
  43. Horrow, R. B. Sports violence: The interaction between private law making and the criminal law. Arlington, Va.: Corrollton Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  44. Huizinga, J. Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  45. Kohlberg, L. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.Google Scholar
  46. Kohlberg, L. Education for justice: A modern statement of the Platonic view. In N. F. Sizer &T.R. Sizer (Eds.), Moral education: Five lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  47. Kohlberg, L. From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. New York: Academic, 1971.Google Scholar
  48. Kohlberg, L., & Gilligan, C. F. The adolescent as philosopher: The discovery of the self in a postconventional world. Daedalus, 1971, 100, 1051–86.Google Scholar
  49. Kohlberg, L., Kauffman, M., Scharf, P., & Hickey, J. The justice structure of the prison: A theory and an intervention. The Prison Journal, 1972, 51 (2).Google Scholar
  50. Kohlberg, L., & Kramer, R. Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development, 1969, 12, 93–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kohlberg, L., & Turiel, E. Moral development and moral education. In G. S. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1971.Google Scholar
  52. Kroll, W. Psychology of sportsmanship. Paper presented at the American Alliance of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance convention, Atlantic City, New Jersey, 1975.Google Scholar
  53. Levine, P. The historical perspective: Violence in sport. Arena Review: The Institute for Sport and Social Analysis, February 1981, 5(1).Google Scholar
  54. Lickona, T. (Ed.). Moral development and behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  55. Lorenz, K. On aggression. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1966.Google Scholar
  56. May, R. Power and innocence: A search for the sources of violence. New York: Dell, 1972.Google Scholar
  57. McClelland, D. Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington, 1975.Google Scholar
  58. Mcintosh, P. Fair play: Ethics in sport and physical education. London: Heinemann, 1979.Google Scholar
  59. Milgram, S. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 371–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mischel, W., & Moore, B. Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards upon self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 390–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nucci, L. Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 1981, 52, 114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nucci, L., & Turiel, E. Social interactions and the development of social concepts in preschool children. Child Development, 1978, 49, 400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Park, R. Citius, altius, fortius. The academy papers (No. 14). Reston, Va.: The American Academy of Physical Education, December 1980.Google Scholar
  64. Piaget, J. The moral judgment of the child. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  65. Piaget, J. The child and reality. New York: Grossman, 1973.Google Scholar
  66. Rawls, J. The theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  67. Rest, J. Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1979. (a)Google Scholar
  68. Rest, J. Revised manual for the defining issues test. Minneapolis: Minnesota Moral Research Projects, 1979. (b)Google Scholar
  69. Rothman, G. R. An experimental analysis of the relationship between level of moral judgement and behavioral choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teacher’s College, Columbia University, 1971.Google Scholar
  70. Rothman, G. R. The influence of moral reasoning on behavioral choices. Child Development, 1976, 47, 397–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rothman, G. The relationship between moral judgment and moral behavior. In M. Windmiller, N. Lambert, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Moral development and socialization. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.Google Scholar
  72. Schwartz, S., Feldman, K., Brown, M., & Heingartner, A. Some personality correlates of conduct in two situations of moral conflict. Journal of Personality, 1969, 57, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scott, J. Sport and aggression. In G. Kenyon (Ed.), Contemporary psychology of sport. Chicago: Athletic Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
  74. Shaver, K. G. Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14(2), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Silva, J. Assertive and aggressive behavior in sport: A definitional clarification. In C. Nadeau, W. Hathwell, K. Newell, & G. Roberts (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1980.Google Scholar
  76. Singer, B. D. Violence, protest and war in television news: The U.S. and Canada compared. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1970–71, 34, 611–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith, M. Sport violence: A definition. Arena, 1981, 5(1), 2–8.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, M. Aggression in sport: Toward a role approach. Journal of the Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1971, 371, 22–25.Google Scholar
  79. Stone, G. American sports: Play and display. Chicago Review, 1955, 9, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tandy, R., & Laflin, J. Aggression and sport: Two theories. In R. Suinn (Ed.), Psychology in sports: Methods and applications. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgess, 1980.Google Scholar
  81. Tatum, J., & Kushner, B. They call me assassin. New York: Avon Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  82. Turiel, E. Conflict and transition in adolescent moral development. Child Development, 1974, 45, 14–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Turiel, E. Distinct conceptual and developmental domains: Social convention and morality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  84. Turiel, E. The development of concepts of social structure: Social convention. In J. Glick & A. Clarke-Stewart (Eds.), Personality and social development (Vol. 1). New York: Gardner Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  85. Turiel, E. Social regulations and domains of social concepts. In W. Damon (Ed.), New Directions for Child Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.Google Scholar
  86. Turiel, E., & Rothman, G. R. The influence of reasoning on behavioral choices at different stages of moral development. Child Development, 1972, 43, 741–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Underwood, J. The death of an American game. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1979.Google Scholar
  88. Webb, H. Professionalization of attitudes toward play among adolescents. In G. S. Kenyon (Ed.), Aspects of contemporary sport sociology. Chicago: The Athletic Institute, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda Jo Bredemeier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations