Advertisement

Psychological Issues in Sports Aggression

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

Sports offer an especially attractive research setting for those interested in increasing the generalizability of laboratory findings as well as the testing of predictions derived from various theories of human behavior. Two features with particular implications for aggression research are worth noting. In combative and some contact sports the aspiring athlete is taught basic skills in interpersonal aggression and lavishly rewarded when they are effectively applied in competition. In these sports interpersonal aggression is met with enthusiastic approval within the sport and a general tolerance on the part of society. Consequently, the arousal of such states as guilt, anxiety, and evaluation apprehension in laboratory subjects required to aggress against one another may not occur to the same degree in sports, providing the investigator with a somewhat unique set of research parameters. Few, if any comparable situations exist outside of wartime. Moreover, aggression research stands to profit from an additional set of behavioral measures. This important gain in triangulation may be achieved through the use of indices of “illegal” behavior, a class of aggression involving acts which violate the rules of a sport and which also satisfy conventional definitions of aggression. As noted elsewhere (Russell, 1981a), the researcher may find other important advantages and reasons to study aggression in the naturalistic context of sports.

Keywords

Football Player Verbal Aggression Psychological Issue Archival Study Media Violence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    LeUnes, A., & Nation, J. R. Saturday’s Heroes: A psychological portrait of college football players. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A & M University, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkins, A., Hilton, I., Neigher, W., & Bahr, A. Anger, fight, fantasy, and catharsis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goranson, R. E. The impact of televised hockey violence (Report No. 1). The LaMarsh Research Programme, Toronto: York University, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joy, L. A., Kimball, M. M., & Zabrack, M. L. Television exposure and children’s aggressive behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goranson, R. E. Sports violence and the catharsis hypothesis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, Toronto, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wankel, L. M. An examination of illegal aggression in intercollegiate hockey. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychomotor Learning and Sport Psychology, Ottawa, 1973.Google Scholar

References

  1. Albrecht, D. Zur sportartspezifischen aggression im wettkampfspiel. Sportwissenshaft, 1979, 9, 78–91.Google Scholar
  2. Arms, R. L., Russell, G. W., & Sandilands, M. L. Effects of viewing aggressive sports on the hostility of spectators. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1979, 42, 275–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. A. Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. Mood changes in a management training laboratory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1962, 46, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berczeller, E. The “aesthetic feelings” and Aristotle’s catharsis theory. Journal of Psychology, 1967, 65, 261–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkowitz, L. Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.Google Scholar
  8. Berkowitz, L. The effects of observing violence. Scientific American, 1964, 210, 35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, L. (Ed.). Roots of aggression. New York: Atherton Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Berkowitz, L. Experimental investigations of hostility catharsis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berkowitz, L. Sports, competition, and aggression. Physical Educator, 1973, 30, 59–61.Google Scholar
  12. Berkowitz, L., & Alioto, J. T. The meaning of an observed event as a determinant of its aggressive consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borden, R. J., & Taylor, S. P. Pennies for pain: A note on instrumental aggression toward a pacifist by vanquished, victorious, and evenly matched opponents. Victimology, 1976, 7, 154–157.Google Scholar
  14. Brill, A. A. The way of the fan. North American Review, 1929, 226, 400–434.Google Scholar
  15. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21, 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Celozzi, M. J. The stimulating versus cathartic effects of viewing televised violence in ice hockey and the relationship on subsequent levels of aggression and hostility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. Christy, P. R., Gelfand, D., & Hartmann, D. P. Effects of competition-induced frustration on two classes of modeled behavior. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cullen, J. B., & Cullen, F. T. The structural and contextural conditions of group norm violation: Some implications from the game of ice hockey. International Review of Sport Sociology, 1975, 2, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dollard, J., Doob, L., Miller, N., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. Frustration and aggression. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eastwood, J. M. The effects of viewing a film of professional hockey on aggression. Medicine and Science in Sports, 1914, 6, 158–163.Google Scholar
  21. Epstein, S., & Taylor, S. P. Instigation to aggression as a function of degree of defeat and perceived aggressive intent of the opponent. Journal of Personality, 1967, 35, 265–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, R. I. A conversation with Konrad Lorenz about aggression, homosexuality, pornography, and the need for a new ethic. Psychology Today, 1974, 8, 82–93.Google Scholar
  23. Feshbach, S. Aggression. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), CarmichaeVs manual of child psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Geen, R. G., & Quanty, M. B. The catharsis of aggression: An evaluation of a hypothesis. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, J. H., & Arms, R. L. Effects of observing athletic contests on hostility. Sociometry, 1971, 34, 83–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldstein, J. H., & Bredemeier, B. J. Sports and socialization: Some basic issues. Journal of Communication, 1977, 27, 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, J. H., Rosnow, R. L., Raday, T., Silverman, I., & Gaskell, G. D. Punitive-ness in response to films varying in content: A cross-national field study of aggression. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 5, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodman, P. Letter to the editor. Scientific American, 1964, 210, 8.Google Scholar
  29. Goranson, R. E. Media violence and aggressive behavior: A review of experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. Harrell, W. A. Verbal aggressiveness in spectators at professional hockey games: The effects of tolerance of violence and amount of exposure to hockey. Human Relations, 1981, 34, 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, M. B. Mediators between frustration and aggression in a field experiment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartmann, D. P. Influence of symbolically modeled aggression and pain cues on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 280–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hornberger, R. H. The differential reduction of aggressive responses as a function of interpolated activities. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 354.Google Scholar
  34. Husman, B. F. Aggression in boxers and wrestlers as measured by projective techniques. Research Quarterly, 1955, 26, 421–425.Google Scholar
  35. Kidd, A. H., & Walton, N. Y. Dart throwing as a method of reducing extrapunitive aggression. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 88–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kingsmore, J. M. The effect of professional wrestling and a professional basketball contest upon the aggressive tendencies of spectators. In G. S. Kenyon (Ed.), Contemporary psychology of sport. Chicago: Athletic Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
  37. Knott, P. D., Lasater, L., & Shuman, R. Aggression-guilt and conditionability for aggressiveness. Journal of Personality, 1974, 42, 332–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lefebvre, L. M., & Passer, M. W. The effects of game location and importance on aggression in team sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1974, 5, 102–110.Google Scholar
  39. Lefkowitz, M. M., Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., & Huesmann, L. R. Growing up to be violent. New York: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  40. Lennon, J. X., & Hatfield, F. C. The effects of crowding and observation of athletic events on spectator tendency toward aggressive behavior. Journal of Sport Behavior, 1980, 5, 61–67.Google Scholar
  41. Leuck, M. R., Krahenbuhl, G. S., & Odenkirk, J. E. Assessment of spectator aggression at intercollegiate basketball contests. Review of Sport and Leisure, 1919, 4, 40–52.Google Scholar
  42. Loew, C. A. Acquisition of a hostile attitude and its relationship to aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 335–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lorenz, K. On aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1966.Google Scholar
  44. Mann, L. On being a sore loser: How fans react to their team’s failure. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1974, 26, 31–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Megargee, E. I., & Hokanson, J. E. (Eds.). The dynamics of aggression. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  46. Mehrabian, A. Public places, and private spaces: Psychology of work, play and living environments. New York: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 1976.Google Scholar
  47. Noble, G. Effects of different forms of filmed aggression on children’s constructive and destructive play. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 54–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nosanchuk, T. A. The way of the warrior: The effects of traditional martial arts training on aggressiveness. Human Relations, 1981, 34, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nowlis, V. Research with the Mood Adjective Check List. In S. S. Tompkins & C. Izard (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and personality. New York: Springer, 1965.Google Scholar
  50. Ostrow, A. The aggressive tendencies of male intercollegiate tennis team players as measured by selected psychological tests. New Zealand Journal of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, 1974, 6, 19–21.Google Scholar
  51. Patterson, A. Hostility catharsis: A naturalistic quasi-experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1914, 1, 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Proctor, R. C, & Eckerd, W. M. “Toot-toot” or spectator sports: Psychological and therapeutic implications. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1976, 4, 78–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quanty, M. B. Aggression catharsis: Experimental investigations and implications. In R. G. Geen & E. C. O’Neal (Eds.), Perspectives on aggression. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  54. Rule, B. G., & Nesdale, A. R. Emotional arousal and aggressive behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 851–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Russell, G. W. Aggression in sport. In P. F. Brain & D. Benton (Eds.), Multidisci-plinary approaches to aggression research. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1981. (a)Google Scholar
  56. Russell, G. W. Spectator moods at an aggressive sports event. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1981, 3, 217–227. (b)Google Scholar
  57. Russell, G. W. Crowd size and density in relation to athletic aggression and performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 1983, 11, 1.Google Scholar
  58. Russell, G. W., & Drewry, B. R. Crowd size and competitive aspects of aggression in ice hockey: An archival study. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, E. D. The cathartic effect of vigorous motor activity on aggressive behavior. Research Quarterly, 1910, 41, 542–551.Google Scholar
  60. Sipes, R. G. War, sports and aggression: An empirical test of two rival theories. American Anthropologist, 1973, 75, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sloan, L. R. The function and impact of sports for fans: A review of theory and contemporary research. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, M. D. Social determinants of violence in hockey: A review. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 1979, 4, 76–82.Google Scholar
  63. Storr, A. Human aggression. New York: Antheneum, 1968.Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, S. P. Gammon, C. B., & Capasso, D. R. Aggression as a function of the interaction of alcohol and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 54, 938–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thirer, J. Changes in aggression of various classifications of athletes and nonathletes as influenced by type of film viewed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, 1976.Google Scholar
  66. Tinbergen, N. On war and peace in animals and man. Science, 1968, 160, 1411–1418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner, E. T. The effects of viewing college football, basketball and wrestling on the elicited aggressive responses of male spectators. Medicine and Science in Sports, 1970, 2, 100–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Volkamer, M. Zurur aggressivitat in konkumenz-orientierten sozialen. Sportwissenschaft, 1971, 1, 68–76.Google Scholar
  69. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. B. Nonreac-tive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.Google Scholar
  70. Worchel, S., Hardy, T. W., & Hurley, R. The effects of commercial interruption of violent and nonviolent films on viewers’ subsequent aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976, 12, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zillmann, D. Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  72. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. Effects of residual excitation on the emotional response to provocation and delayed aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1914, 30, 782–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., & Sapolsky, B. S. The enjoyment of watching sport contests. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  74. Zillmann, D., Johnson, R. C, & Day, K. D. Provoked and unprovoked aggressiveness in athletes. Journal of Research in Personality, 1974, 8, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations