Future Prospects for Urodynamic Study in Clinical Evaluation of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

  • Pieter J. Donker
  • Norman R. Zinner
  • Arthur M. Sterling

Abstract

It is estimated that one-third of all men older than 60 have enlarged prostates, yet only 25% of them complain of voiding dysfunction.7 Many of these men also have no gross symptoms of obstructed flow. These observations are in accord with the findings of Yalla et al.,12 who discovered that men with moderate or even severe enlargement of the prostate can be without symptoms of obstruction. When tested by urodynamic methods, obstruction was found to be either mild or altogether absent. On the other hand, Platenkamp9 observed that totally asymptomatic men can have occult obstruction that may not be evident unless sensitive testing techniques are used. Using the urinary drop spectrometer (UDS), 461 apparently normal men in the armed services (age 19–55 years) were surveyed at random. They produced a total of 4109 voidings. Of the 461, Platenkamp found 29 who had UDS patterns that were compatible with obstruction. The age groupings of the men in the study and of those with abnormal UDS patterns are shown in Table 1.

Keywords

Tate Tral Univer Cote Exter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams PA, Griffiths DJ: The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol 51: 129, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albright R, Harris J, Zinner NR: Transcutaneous measurement of the urethral lumen. Invest Urol 8: 340, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartsch G, Frick J, Ruegg I, Bucher M, Holliger O, Oberholzer M, Rohr HP: Electron microscopic stereological analysis of the normal human prostate and of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 122: 481–486, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartsch G, Muller HR, Oberholzer M, Rohr HP: Light microscopic stereological analysis of the normal human prostate and of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 122: 487–491, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cote R, Burke H, Schoenberg HW: Prediction of unusual postoperative results by urodynamic testing in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 125: 690–692, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dröes JThPM: Observations on the musculature of the urinary bladder and urethra in the human fetus. Br J Urol 46: 169–185, 1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gammelgaard PA, Andersen J, Hald T, Jacobsen O, Nordling J, Wacher S: Prostatic hypertrophy, symptomatology and investigations: indications for treatment. In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society, VIth Annual Meeting, Antwerp, 1976Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hedges J: The sound spectrum of turbulence in obstructed capillary flow. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, 1973Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Platenkamp GJJM: Over de normale waarden bij urinedruppelspectrometrie. Thesis, University of Leiden, 1981Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stokvis H, Kramer AEJL, Donker PJ: Voiding patterns of normal men and prostatic hypertrophy patients: differences by urinary drop spectrometry. Presented at the 18th Congress of the International Society of Urology, Paris, 1979Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Ulden BM: De musculatuur van de blaashals en de urethra posterior bij de man. Thesis, University of Leiden, 1975Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yalla SV, Blute R, Waters WB, Snyder H, Fraser L: Urodynamic evaluation of prostatic enlargements with micturitional vesicourethral static pressure profiles. J Urol 125: 685–689, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zinner NR: The challenge from the future. In Miranda SI, de Voogt HJ (eds.): Current and Future Trends in Urology. Bunge Scientific Publishers, Utrecht, 1979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter J. Donker
  • Norman R. Zinner
  • Arthur M. Sterling

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations